I implemented a small ecommerce site just to investigate J2EE and EJB capabilities. I did it with the reference implementation using a lot of CMP Entity Beans with local interfaces and everything went well.
Then I decided to play a bit with the evaluation version of WebSphere 4.0 and I was disappointed in discovering that when I tried to create a new EJB component, in the creation wizard there was no place where specify the local interfaces for the component itself.
So the question is: does Websphere support components with local interfaces? Where do I specify such interfaces?
Thank you,
Fabio
-
Websphere question (3 messages)
- Posted by: Fabio Mancinelli
- Posted on: April 19 2002 11:43 EDT
Threaded Messages (3)
- Websphere question by Mirko Novakovic on April 19 2002 13:50 EDT
- Websphere question by Prasath Balakrishnan on April 22 2002 02:03 EDT
- Websphere question by Fabio Mancinelli on April 30 2002 09:24 EDT
-
Websphere question[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Mirko Novakovic
- Posted on: April 19 2002 13:50 EDT
- in response to Fabio Mancinelli
Fabio,
I have to disappoint you...WebSphere 4.0 supports only EJB1.1. Local interfaces were intoduces with EJB2.0. There is a WebSphere Developer Edition (a beta of WebSphere 5.0) which has support for EJB2.0.
Otherwise try Bea Weblogic6 or higher, Pramati...there are a lot of J2EE1.3 certified AppServers out there...
Have fun!
Mirko -
Websphere question[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Prasath Balakrishnan
- Posted on: April 22 2002 02:03 EDT
- in response to Mirko Novakovic
Local Interfaces are the new part of J2EERI1.3.1 onwards .When we ( my prof & myself) asked IBM, no need for those is what IBM said.people are not implementing these itself,why new and new technologies.
I really doubt whether IBM will support in 5.0 as mentioned
Good luck and keep trying...
Prasath -
Websphere question[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Fabio Mancinelli
- Posted on: April 30 2002 09:24 EDT
- in response to Mirko Novakovic
Hi Mirko!
I'm really disappointed. We used WebSphere 3.5 and it implemented the EJB1.1 specification. I really believed that version 4.0 was EJB2.0 compliant. Probably I read that somewhere but there was obviously a misunderstanding.
Thank you anyway! :)
Bye,
Fabio