I have a requirement wherein I can't use application server or a TP monitor or any other s/w that enables nested transaction .
Requirement
===========
1. Multiple threads are doing some processing. Each thread should be able to commit its portion.
2. Finally after all the threads are done I should do a final commit.
Solution
========
1. A controller creats a connection object and creats prepared statement for each thread and passes it to respective threads. I am not doing any commit in each thread, just executing queries.
2. Maintain a hashmap that keeps track of status of each thread and once all threads are done finally call commit on the connection object.
Problem
======
1. Since each thread is using the same underlying connection so this will be slow.
2. JDBC limits me in the way I can implement transaction and it doesn't support nested transactions.
Any ideas???
Discussions
Performance and scalability: Implementing transactions across threads without using J2EE
-
Implementing transactions across threads without using J2EE (1 messages)
- Posted by: Neela datta
- Posted on: April 19 2002 21:12 EDT
Threaded Messages (1)
- Implementing transactions across threads without using J2EE by L Stitz on April 22 2002 03:22 EDT
-
Implementing transactions across threads without using J2EE[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: L Stitz
- Posted on: April 22 2002 03:22 EDT
- in response to Neela datta
Perhaps using a JDO implementation might solve your problem? Have a look at it, it's generally very good to use if you need ACID transactions (and persistence) without the overhead of a full J2EE implementation.
On the other hand, it DOES use some kind of transaction monitor... (The PersistenceManager, that is.)
Well, anyway, you only asked for ideas...
Lars