OSWorkflow is a very flexible Java-based workflow system that can be plugged in to almost any need or existing application. Uses can range from document management to order processing to project management. Includes support for many different interfaces (SOAP, EJB, Java Class) as well as persistence (EJB, JDBC, XML, Ofbiz).
OSWorkflow takes advantage of many existing Java opensource projects, including:
-BeanShell: for workflow scripting
-OpenForBusiness: entity engine persistence supported
-GLUE: for a SOAP interface
-Quartz: for job scheduling
OSWorkflow can work in any J2EE container, including servlet containers (of course, EJB support does not work here). OSWorkflow was designed to be as flexible as possible to fit the needs of many unique requirements.
OpenSymphony:
http://www.opensymphony.com.
OSWorkflow:
http://www.opensymphony.com/osworkflow
.
Download:
http://freshmeat.net/redir/osworkflow/30151/url_tgz/osworkflow_1-0-beta2.zip?download.
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released (40 messages)
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 03 2002 18:33 EDT
Threaded Messages (40)
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Davide Baroncelli on June 04 2002 12:47 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Ray Grieselhuber on June 04 2002 13:10 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Davide Baroncelli on June 04 2002 01:25 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 04 2002 01:39 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Mark N on June 06 2002 08:17 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Basil Tchurilov on June 07 2002 09:48 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Mark N on June 06 2002 08:17 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 04 2002 01:39 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Davide Baroncelli on June 04 2002 01:25 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Ray Grieselhuber on June 04 2002 13:10 EDT
- GLUE is not open source software by Richard Hansen on June 04 2002 13:53 EDT
- GLUE is not open source software by Patrick Lightbody on June 04 2002 14:33 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Olivier Brand on June 04 2002 03:01 EDT
- IBM WSIF isn't open source either by Anne Manes on June 05 2002 08:47 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Anne Manes on June 05 2002 08:43 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Joseph Ottinger on June 05 2002 10:46 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Anthony Eden on June 05 2002 11:47 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Patrick Lightbody on June 05 2002 01:59 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Mark N on June 06 2002 08:11 EDT
- GLUE is not open source software by Patrick Lightbody on June 06 2002 11:14 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Mark N on June 06 2002 08:11 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Patrick Lightbody on June 05 2002 01:59 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Anthony Eden on June 05 2002 11:47 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Joseph Ottinger on June 05 2002 10:46 EDT
-
GLUE is not open source software by Olivier Brand on June 04 2002 03:01 EDT
- GLUE is not open source software by Patrick Lightbody on June 04 2002 14:33 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Jonathan Leech on June 04 2002 17:12 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 04 2002 17:41 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Jonathan Leech on June 04 2002 06:14 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 04 2002 06:22 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 05 2002 03:41 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Ray Grieselhuber on June 05 2002 08:19 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 05 2002 02:51 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Ray Grieselhuber on June 05 2002 08:19 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Jonathan Leech on June 04 2002 06:14 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 04 2002 17:41 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Anthony Eden on June 05 2002 11:51 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by tiger ceo on June 06 2002 06:28 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 06 2002 11:12 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 06 2002 17:48 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released by Jonathan Leech on June 07 2002 10:33 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released by Ray Grieselhuber on June 07 2002 06:50 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released by Patrick Lightbody on June 07 2002 10:06 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released by Ray Grieselhuber on June 07 2002 06:50 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Dexter Liu on June 09 2002 23:14 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Dexter Liu on June 09 2002 23:17 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Dexter Liu on June 09 2002 23:18 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Patrick Lightbody on June 10 2002 01:10 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Dexter Liu on June 10 2002 03:17 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Patrick Lightbody on June 10 2002 03:24 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Patrick Lightbody on June 10 2002 03:43 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Dexter Liu on June 10 2002 03:55 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Patrick Lightbody on June 10 2002 04:25 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Patrick Lightbody on June 10 2002 03:24 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Dexter Liu on June 10 2002 03:17 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1 by Patrick Lightbody on June 10 2002 01:10 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released by Jonathan Leech on June 07 2002 10:33 EDT
- OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released by d d on August 02 2002 06:47 EDT
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Davide Baroncelli
- Posted on: June 04 2002 12:47 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
Uh, is this related in any way to the workflow system that the open for business people are developing in one of their subprojects? What are the main differences to their effort? -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Ray Grieselhuber
- Posted on: June 04 2002 13:10 EDT
- in response to Davide Baroncelli
Just from looking at the websites it seems that OpenSymphony is much further ahead that the Open for business project, both in terms of features and documentation. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Davide Baroncelli
- Posted on: June 04 2002 13:25 EDT
- in response to Ray Grieselhuber
I don't know much of it, but I sometimes take a look at their mailing list, and I think that ofb is nearing release: the workflow project seemed to me pretty interesting, because it is standards based, i.e. it implements features and uses a workflow definition language in a standard format (the one that's specified in XML by wfmc, i think the name is XPDL). Actually, I think the focus for them is having a workflow component in the general ofb architecture (which is more of a framework than a system for building e-commerce sites as the name could suggest). Maybe the main difference is the fact osworkflow is a general purpose workflow solution for j2ee architectures? I was just wondering if they share part of the code base or not. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 04 2002 13:39 EDT
- in response to Davide Baroncelli
Both OpenForBusiness and OpenSymphony are very far along with development, and both are great projects. OpenSymphony and Ofbiz don't do any code sharing. However, OpenSymphony components such as OSCore, OSUser, and OSWorkflow all have support for the Ofbiz entity engine as an alternative to persisting data instead of EJB entity beans.
As for the differences to OSWorkflow and Ofbiz's workflow engine, you are right on the money. Fundamentally, they are very different in their goals and implementation. As I said, both projects are very far along with development and are stable enough for production use.
Anyone looking for Java-based workflow should do themselves a favor and check out both projects. In fact, even if you aren't working with workflow, check out the projects anyway, there's a lot of great products! -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Mark N
- Posted on: June 06 2002 08:17 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
"Anyone looking for Java-based workflow should do themselves a favor and check out both projects. In fact, even if you aren't working with workflow, check out the projects anyway, there's a lot of great products! "
There are many projects that really are workflow type projects but end up getting implemented as Client/Server applications. Because the 'developers' don't know any better (90%) or Biztalk/Exchange, Lotus Notes/Workflow, etc. where way to expensive.
I can't wait to explore this[these] tool(s) further! And maybe get involved!
Mark -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Basil Tchurilov
- Posted on: June 07 2002 09:48 EDT
- in response to Mark N
Davide Baroncelli wrote:
>> the workflow project seemed to me pretty interesting,
>> because it is standards based, i.e. it implements
>> features and uses a workflow definition language
>> in a standard format (the one that's specified
>> in XML by wfmc, i think the name is XPDL).
XPDL is not standard yet, it's in early draft.
Support for XPDL or BPML in itself does not make a product great. The benefit of standard comes in play only when this standard is widely adopted in the industry (e.g. J2EE, EJB). So far I can't say that neither about WfMC nor about BPMI. Both XPDL and BPML are not yet released as standards. Furthermore as all mainstream technologies they have many evident drawbacks(not the subject of this thread). IMO that's one of the reasons why WPDL hasn't been widely adopted.
BTW: To be honest Ofbiz doesn't support XPDL completely.
Anyway WPDL/XPDL and BPML are significant steps towards WfM and BPM recognition, but NOT the reference models.
Hi Mark,
you wrote:
>> I can't wait to explore this[these]
>> tool(s) further! And maybe get involved!
I'm working on project of full-blown BPMS. If you are really interested in collaboration, email me to to@basilt at javait dot net.
To Patrick:
Good work..indeed!
Regards, Basil -
GLUE is not open source software[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Richard Hansen
- Posted on: June 04 2002 13:53 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
Sorry, but GLUE is not open source. Here is part of the license. I wonder if OpenSymphony has not already violated it?
"GLUE Standard is free for most commercial uses, except for bundling as part of an IDE or software infrastructure platform, or embedding into a device which is not a standard PC or server." -
GLUE is not open source software[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 04 2002 14:33 EDT
- in response to Richard Hansen
You know, I read that license too and I thought I was good to go, but now I'm not so sure. Thanks for raising that point, I've contacted TME and will sort this issue out right away.
As for GLUE not being "open source", it actually is open source (as the source is freely available), but the license isn't GNU or Apache or anything like that. -
GLUE is not open source software[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Olivier Brand
- Posted on: June 04 2002 15:01 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
It would be better to plug to Axis from Apache or the abstraction layer provided by IBM WSIF (so you can plug to many SOAP servers).
Have you taken a look at the WSFL document from IBM ? This is a document part of their web service toolkit and describes a workflow approach, very interesting and of a high quality. -
IBM WSIF isn't open source either[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Anne Manes
- Posted on: June 05 2002 08:47 EDT
- in response to Olivier Brand
Note this paragraph from the IBM WSIF license agreement:
IBM grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable license to download the Software and use it only for your personal, non-commercial and lawful end use. Implied licenses are negated. -
GLUE is not open source software[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Anne Manes
- Posted on: June 05 2002 08:43 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
There's a big difference between "open source" and "the source is available". Just because someone publishes the source, that doesn't mean that you can do anything you want with it. There is intellectual property in the source code, and it's usually protected by copyright and sometimes by patents. (The same rules apply to specifications, too.) You should always make sure you obtain a license to any intellectual property before you use it.
Open source is a licensing practice. There are lots of different open source licenses, but you can distill them down into two basic types. Some are very free (BSD, Apache, Artistic), essentially letting you do anything you like with the code and imposing no real obligations on you other than acknowledgement of the source (i.e., you may use it in a commercial product). Others are viral (GPL, LGPL), which let you do anything with the code, but you must contribute all derivative works back to the open source community, and all code containing/derived from the open source code must also be open source (i.e., you may not use it in a commercial product).
Compare open source to Microsoft's "shared source". Microsoft will allow you to look at their source code so that you can do a better job building drivers and applications that work in the Windows platform. But you are not permitted to create derivative works from the source code. -
GLUE is not open source software[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Joseph Ottinger
- Posted on: June 05 2002 10:46 EDT
- in response to Anne Manes
Sure, open source is really kewl and all, yet sometimes open source software just doesn't work well enough to spend time on it. Apache SOAP is a good example of this; Axis is better but IMHO not quite there yet. GLUE is what I expect a Java SOAP solution to be: nearly transparent, and follows the principles of least surprise.
It's all well and good to jump on a high horse waving about an open source flag when open source matches what commercial offerings have... but this isn't one of those cases. Get off. -
GLUE is not open source software[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Anthony Eden
- Posted on: June 05 2002 11:47 EDT
- in response to Joseph Ottinger
I don't think the author of the message was implying that open source is better or what have you, rather just trying to bring it to everyones attention that you have to understand the license to libraries you rely on. The main point is that "open source" and "viewable source" are potentially two very different things. No reason to get nasty about it. -
GLUE is not open source software[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 05 2002 13:59 EDT
- in response to Anthony Eden
OK, update on the GLUE issue:
I just spoke with some folks at TheMindElectric and I'm told that GLUE does indeed have to go. That's unfortunate, but totally understandable. So I'll be pulling GLUE from OSWorkflow and replacing it with Apache Axis along with hooks to GLUE if you wish to use it. I believe that GLUE is a FAR superior product and wish to continue to support it in OSWorkflow in any way that I can.
Beta 3 will be released tomorrow. -
GLUE is not open source software[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Mark N
- Posted on: June 06 2002 08:11 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
"I just spoke with some folks at TheMindElectric and I'm told that GLUE does indeed have to go"
That is too bad. The fact that OpenSymphony Workflow is not a commercial product doesn't matter?
So we can use it - you just can't bundle it? That's fine.
What's the diff?
Mark -
GLUE is not open source software[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 06 2002 11:14 EDT
- in response to Mark N
Yes, basically GLUE can't be bundled, but it can be supported. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Jonathan Leech
- Posted on: June 04 2002 17:12 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
I couldn't get this to work on JBoss2.4.4/Tomcat4.0.1... What version of JBoss/Tomcat or JBoss/Jetty is osworkflow_example.ear supposed to be deployed on? -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 04 2002 17:41 EDT
- in response to Jonathan Leech
JBoss 2.4.4 + Tomcat 4.0.1 was what OSWF was tested on, but not nearly as extensively as it was under Orion. I just deployed OSWorkflow on JBoss (had to tweak a few deployment settings that will be added to CVS and beta 3 soon). -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Jonathan Leech
- Posted on: June 04 2002 18:14 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
OK - I'll try it again on a virgin JBoss installation once you release beta 3. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 04 2002 18:22 EDT
- in response to Jonathan Leech
Great... I've already got the code in CVS and have verified that everything deploys and runs in JBoss 2.4.4. Beta 3 will include these changes as well as step-by-step instructions as how to get the example app running on Orion and JBoss. Support for Pramati app server will also be included in this release.
Lastly, the GLUE licensing issue will also be resolved. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 05 2002 03:41 EDT
- in response to Jonathan Leech
OK, beta 3 will be online as soon as the GLUE issues are worked out (or I'll switch to Axis). In the meantime, you can grab the latest from CVS, which no includes step-by-step documentation on deploying to Orion, JBoss, or Pramati, as well as tips on getting it to deploy on any other servlet-container. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Ray Grieselhuber
- Posted on: June 05 2002 08:19 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
Out of the box support on WebSphere and WebLogic would be nice too. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 05 2002 14:51 EDT
- in response to Ray Grieselhuber
WebLogic support will be included in the 1.0 final release. WebSphere won't, but I'll try to get it in soon thereafter.
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Anthony Eden
- Posted on: June 05 2002 11:51 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
Just to throw another wrinkle in this, check out http://www.openbusinessengine.org/ for another open source workflow engine which I have been working on.
I think one of the interesting aspects of workflow is that it can mean so many different things. In addition to traditional workflow which was designed to handle long running business processes which required machine and human intervention, there are also document workflow systems, image workflow, manufacturing workflow and some newer incarnations: application workflow, web control workflow, etc.
Fun stuff. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: tiger ceo
- Posted on: June 06 2002 06:28 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
I just reviewed the dtd.txt and am wondering whether you implemented the workflow engine according to the WfMC standard. As I didn't see any definition about process, activity, transition, instance, etc in the dtd. These concepts are very important to define a workflow. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 06 2002 11:12 EDT
- in response to tiger ceo
tiger ceo,
No, we didn't follow the WMfC standard in OSWorkflow. All those features you pointed are in fact included in OSWorkflow, but go by slightly different terms I suppose. If you are looking for a total standards compliant workflow engine, I recommend checking out the Ofbiz workflow engine, as it follows several specs very tightly. OSWorkflow takes a different approach by attempting to provide a very simple but robust system for which most workflow requirements can be addressed.
-Pat -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 06 2002 17:48 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
OK, beta 3 is available to download at:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/opensymphony/osworkflow_1-0-beta-3.zip?download
Here is the changelog:
Resolved the GLUE licensing issue (basically, you have to download it on your own, as the docs explain)
Verified deployment and functionality on Orion, JBoss (2.4 and 3), WebLogic (6.1 and 7), and Pramati 3.0.
Updated documentation that details how to get the example app running. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Jonathan Leech
- Posted on: June 07 2002 10:33 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
Got it working in JBoss2.4.4/Tomcat4.01 -- It was pretty straightforward this time. I'm still having a couple of problems, but I think they might be due to using hypersql instead of Oracle. Good job, Patrick. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Ray Grieselhuber
- Posted on: June 07 2002 18:50 EDT
- in response to Jonathan Leech
Having it run on Websphere out of the box would be very nice. Given that many Lotus customers are looking at / moving towards WebSphere, they will want affordable workflow on this platform. OSWorfklow seems like a good option from what I have seen so far.
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 07 2002 22:06 EDT
- in response to Ray Grieselhuber
Well now that WebLogic support is mostly done, WebSphere has become a high priority. I downloaded one of IBM's Redbooks, so I'll get cracking on it soon. Please subscribe to opensymphony-discuss to keep updated. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Dexter Liu
- Posted on: June 09 2002 23:14 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
Hi Patrick, I've tryed to install OpenSynphony on wlogic6.1. And the installation seemed successful. i got no errors when i started up weblogic6.1 server.
Here's the related information in weblogic.log:
####<2002-6-10 上午10时41分32秒> <Info> <Management> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <141034> <Java system property: java.class.path = .;d:\eplatform4.0_01\lib\classes12.zip;.\lib\weblogic_sp.jar;.\lib\weblogic.jar;;D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\lib\oscore.jar;;D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\lib\osuser.jar;;D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\lib\bsh-1.2b5.jar;;D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\config\osworkflow.xml;;D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\config\osuser.xml;;D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\config\workflows.xml;;D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\config\test.xml;>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分14秒> <Info> <JDBC> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <001082> <Creating Data Source named jdbc/DefaultDS for pool osymphony>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分14秒> <Info> <JDBC> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <001070> <Checking existence of connection pool osymphony requested by user system>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分23秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010008> <EJB Deploying file: osworkflow.jar>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分23秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name Workflow.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分24秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name WorkflowEntry.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分24秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name Step.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分24秒> <Info> <J2EE> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <160003> <Deployed : osworkflow>
To be continued... -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Dexter Liu
- Posted on: June 09 2002 23:17 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分25秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010008> <EJB Deploying file: oscore.jar>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分25秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name os.PropertyStore.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分25秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name os.PropertyEntry.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分25秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name os.PropertyString.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分26秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name os.Sequence.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分26秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name os.PropertyDecimal.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分26秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name os.PropertyDate.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分26秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name os.PropertyData.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分26秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name os.PropertyNumber.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分26秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name os.SequenceGenerator.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分26秒> <Info> <J2EE> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <160003> <Deployed : oscore>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010008> <EJB Deploying file: osuser.jar>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Warning> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010001> <EJB Deployment: os.Group cannot be redeployed while the server is running. com.opensymphony.module.user.provider.ejb.entity.GroupCMP is located in the server's classpath.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Warning> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010001> <EJB Deployment: os.Group cannot be redeployed while the server is running. com.opensymphony.module.user.provider.ejb.entity.GroupHome is located in the server's classpath.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Warning> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010001> <EJB Deployment: os.Group cannot be redeployed while the server is running. com.opensymphony.module.user.provider.ejb.entity.GroupRemote is located in the server's classpath.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Warning> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010001> <EJB Deployment: os.Membership cannot be redeployed while the server is running. com.opensymphony.module.user.provider.ejb.entity.MembershipCMP is located in the server's classpath.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Warning> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010001> <EJB Deployment: os.Membership cannot be redeployed while the server is running. com.opensymphony.module.user.provider.ejb.entity.MembershipHome is located in the server's classpath.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Warning> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010001> <EJB Deployment: os.Membership cannot be redeployed while the server is running. com.opensymphony.module.user.provider.ejb.entity.MembershipRemote is located in the server's classpath.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Warning> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010001> <EJB Deployment: os.User cannot be redeployed while the server is running. com.opensymphony.module.user.provider.ejb.entity.UserCMP is located in the server's classpath.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Warning> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010001> <EJB Deployment: os.User cannot be redeployed while the server is running. com.opensymphony.module.user.provider.ejb.entity.UserHome is located in the server's classpath.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Warning> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010001> <EJB Deployment: os.User cannot be redeployed while the server is running. com.opensymphony.module.user.provider.ejb.entity.UserRemote is located in the server's classpath.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name ejb/osuser/User.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name ejb/osuser/Membership.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <010009> <EJB Deployed EJB with JNDI name ejb/osuser/Group.>
####<2002-6-10 上午10时42分27秒> <Info> <J2EE> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <main> <system> <> <160003> <Deployed : osuser>
To be continued... -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Dexter Liu
- Posted on: June 09 2002 23:18 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
After starting up weblogic and following the installation docs, I created the three groups and a user named osymphony on http://localhost:7001/manager/ successfully. Also I did the same thing on with weblogic server console. Then I logged in http://localhost:7001/example/default.jsp as the user osymphony. Everything was ok so far. No errors and no warings. But with i clicked the link New Workflow, I got exceptions.
Here's the Exceptions from the console:
<2002-6-10 上午10时42分51秒> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <Started WebLogic Admin S
erver "myserver" for domain "mydomain" running in Development Mode>
[FATAL] com.opensymphony.workflow.loader.URLWorkflowFactory : Unable to find wor
kflow test
java.net.MalformedURLException: no protocol: test
at java.net.URL.<init>(URL.java:473)
at java.net.URL.<init>(URL.java:376)
at java.net.URL.<init>(URL.java:330)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.loader.URLWorkflowFactory.getWorkflow(URLWo
rkflowFactory.java:30)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.config.ConfigLoader.getWorkflow(ConfigLoade
r.java:30)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.AbstractWorkflow.getWorkflow(AbstractWorkfl
ow.java:80)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.AbstractWorkflow.initialize(AbstractWorkflo
w.java:410)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.WorkflowEJB_1njufz_EOImpl.initialize(Wo
rkflowEJB_1njufz_EOImpl.java:582)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.EJBWorkflow.initialize(EJBWorkflow.java
:69)
at jsp_servlet.__newworkflow._jspService(__newworkflow.java:98)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubIm
pl.java:265)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubIm
pl.java:304)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubIm
pl.java:200)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppSe
rvletContext.java:2456)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestIm
pl.java:2039)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
[ERROR] com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.EJBWorkflow : java.rmi.RemoteException: EJ
B Exception: ; nested exception is:
com.opensymphony.workflow.InternalWorkflowException
<2002-6-10 上午11时12分15秒> <Error> <HTTP> <[WebAppServletContext(1297684,web,/
web)] Servlet failed with Exception
java.lang.RuntimeException: EJB Exception: ; nested exception is:
com.opensymphony.workflow.InternalWorkflowException
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.EJBWorkflow.initialize(EJBWorkflow.java
:72)
at jsp_servlet.__newworkflow._jspService(__newworkflow.java:98)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
And here are the exceptions from weblogic.log:
####<2002-6-10 上午11时12分14秒> <Info> <EJB> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'default'> <osymphony> <17:f13f76ae7f28edb9> <010051> <EJB Exception during invocation from home: com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.WorkflowEJB_1njufz_HomeImpl@2c20d7 threw exception: com.opensymphony.workflow.InternalWorkflowException>
com.opensymphony.workflow.InternalWorkflowException
at com.opensymphony.workflow.AbstractWorkflow.getWorkflow(AbstractWorkflow.java:82)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.AbstractWorkflow.initialize(AbstractWorkflow.java:410)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.WorkflowEJB_1njufz_EOImpl.initialize(WorkflowEJB_1njufz_EOImpl.java:582)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.EJBWorkflow.initialize(EJBWorkflow.java:69)
at jsp_servlet.__newworkflow._jspService(__newworkflow.java:98)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:265)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:304)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:200)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletContext.java:2456)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java:2039)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
Root cause:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unknown workflow name
at com.opensymphony.workflow.config.ConfigLoader.getWorkflow(ConfigLoader.java:32)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.AbstractWorkflow.getWorkflow(AbstractWorkflow.java:80)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.AbstractWorkflow.initialize(AbstractWorkflow.java:410)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.WorkflowEJB_1njufz_EOImpl.initialize(WorkflowEJB_1njufz_EOImpl.java:582)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.EJBWorkflow.initialize(EJBWorkflow.java:69)
at jsp_servlet.__newworkflow._jspService(__newworkflow.java:98)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:265)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:304)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:200)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletContext.java:2456)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java:2039)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
####<2002-6-10 上午11时12分15秒> <Error> <HTTP> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '11' for queue: 'default'> <osymphony> <> <101020> <[WebAppServletContext(1297684,web,/web)] Servlet failed with Exception>
java.lang.RuntimeException: EJB Exception: ; nested exception is:
com.opensymphony.workflow.InternalWorkflowException
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.EJBWorkflow.initialize(EJBWorkflow.java:72)
at jsp_servlet.__newworkflow._jspService(__newworkflow.java:98)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:265)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:304)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:200)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletContext.java:2456)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java:2039)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
Would you like to provide some hits to me to solve the problems, Patrick?
Thanks in advance. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 10 2002 01:10 EDT
- in response to Dexter Liu
Try placing "D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\config" and let us know what happens. It appears you put the XML files in your classpath directly. Actually, for WebLogic (since OSUser isn't integrated in yet), all you need is D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\config and D:\lliu\docs\workflow\opensymphony\opensymphony1_0b3\config\bsh-1.2b5.jar in your classpath.
-Pat -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Dexter Liu
- Posted on: June 10 2002 03:17 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
Thank you so much for your quick and useful reply, Patrick. Yes, you are right.I corrected the classpath settings and then it worked. I got a workflow entry created and initialized. But when I entered the workflow entry id provided by opensymphony and choosed view operation on http://localhost:7001/example/newworkflow.jsp, I got errors.
Here they are(from weblogic.log):
<dexter-liu> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'default'> <osymphony> <> <010051> <EJB Exception during invocation from home: com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.WorkflowEJB_1njufz_HomeImpl@33940a threw exception: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError>
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
at com.opensymphony.workflow.AbstractWorkflow.setBshVariables(AbstractWorkflow.java:200)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.AbstractWorkflow.evaluateExpression(AbstractWorkflow.java:209)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.AbstractWorkflow.getAvailableActions(AbstractWorkflow.java:635)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.WorkflowEJB_1njufz_EOImpl.getAvailableActions(WorkflowEJB_1njufz_EOImpl.java:288)
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.EJBWorkflow.getAvailableActions(EJBWorkflow.java:87)
at jsp_servlet.__test._jspService(__test.java:114)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:265)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:304)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:200)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletContext.java:2456)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java:2039)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
####<2002-6-10 下午02时37分21秒> <Error> <HTTP> <dexter-liu> <myserver> <ExecuteThread: '14' for queue: 'default'> <osymphony> <> <101020> <[WebAppServletContext(1981187,web,/web)] Servlet failed with Exception>
java.lang.RuntimeException: EJB Exception: ; nested exception is:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
at com.opensymphony.workflow.ejb.EJBWorkflow.getAvailableActions(EJBWorkflow.java:90)
at jsp_servlet.__test._jspService(__test.java:114)
at weblogic.servlet.jsp.JspBase.service(JspBase.java:27)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:265)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:304)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.invokeServlet(ServletStubImpl.java:200)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.invokeServlet(WebAppServletContext.java:2456)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.execute(ServletRequestImpl.java:2039)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
I checked AbstractWorkflow.java:200 and found there was a method Interpreter.set(String key, Object o). Further i checked Interpreter.class in bsh-1.2b5.jar and there did have a method set(String key,Object o). Could you give me some suggestions on solving the problem, Patrick?
Thanks in advance. -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 10 2002 03:24 EDT
- in response to Dexter Liu
Interesting... I recall that WebLogic includes BeanShell is some of their distributions, so it might be that there is a conflict here? -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 10 2002 03:43 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
-
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Dexter Liu
- Posted on: June 10 2002 03:55 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
YES! weblogic6.1 is using beanshell too. I set bsh-1.2b5.jar before weblogic.jar in the classpath. And now OpenSymphony's working quite well with the example, Patrick! Thank you so much, man.
And i am continuing studying OpenSymphony. Here's another question on it. Wether/How does it support transctions? If it utilizes EJB transaction management provided by EJB container, that will be pretty cool, i think.
BTW, do you have any chatting tools for instant contact, Patrick?My yahoo messenger id is tom5tom5tom5.
Regards -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 3 on weblogic6.1[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Lightbody
- Posted on: June 10 2002 04:25 EDT
- in response to Dexter Liu
OSWorkflow is just one component in the OpenSymphony suite.
As for transactions in OSWorkflow, there are three interfaces that implement Workflow:
EJBWorkflow (can uses EJB persistence or Ofbiz persistence and uses the EJB container managed transactions)
OfbizWorkflow (uses Ofbiz persistence and TransactionUtil, which in turns talks the to JTA implementation in your app server)
BasicWorkflow (can use EJB persistence or Ofbiz persistence and uses no direct transactions. However, since it is using a managed datasource, it could be used within another transaction and work atomically).
As for contact me and the rest of the OpenSymphony crew, I recommend you check out http://www.opensymphony.com/contact.jsp -
OpenSymphony Workflow - 1.0 beta 2 Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: d d
- Posted on: August 02 2002 06:47 EDT
- in response to Patrick Lightbody
Has anybody got OSWorkflow working on JBoss 3.0.0 release with an oracle database ?.