Mark Driver, research director for ebusiness technologies at Gartner, said Microsoft has failed in its first battle to kill Sun Microsystems' Java, but the war for control of the multi-billion dollar application development market is not over.
This bold statement and other Gartner forcasts on the future of Java were published in two articles on vnunet.com.
Read Gartner on Java part 1/2: Java programmers are two expensive.
Read Gartner on Java part 2/2: >.NET is behind Java.
-
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java (8 messages)
- Posted by: Floyd Marinescu
- Posted on: October 18 2000 20:15 EDT
Threaded Messages (8)
- Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Jean-Francois Bilodeau on October 19 2000 08:35 EDT
- Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by derek van kooten on October 19 2000 08:37 EDT
- Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Jacob Glozman on October 19 2000 11:40 EDT
- Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Floyd Marinescu on October 19 2000 11:54 EDT
-
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Vimal Kansal on October 19 2000 08:06 EDT
-
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Gary Steinmetz on October 20 2000 03:10 EDT
-
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Lee Cardona on March 02 2001 01:45 EST
- Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Lee Cardona on March 02 2001 01:48 EST
-
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Lee Cardona on March 02 2001 01:45 EST
-
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Gary Steinmetz on October 20 2000 03:10 EDT
-
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Vimal Kansal on October 19 2000 08:06 EDT
- Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java by Floyd Marinescu on October 19 2000 11:54 EDT
-
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Jean-Francois Bilodeau
- Posted on: October 19 2000 08:35 EDT
- in response to Floyd Marinescu
URL to story is not working for me...
J-F -
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: derek van kooten
- Posted on: October 19 2000 08:37 EDT
- in response to Floyd Marinescu
how about including part one of the story where it talks about that 50% of all new projects will be java, but 70% will not see the light of day???
http://www.vnunet.com/News/1112655
-
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Jacob Glozman
- Posted on: October 19 2000 11:40 EDT
- in response to Floyd Marinescu
The correct URL is http://www.vnunet.com/News/1112564 -
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Floyd Marinescu
- Posted on: October 19 2000 11:54 EDT
- in response to Jacob Glozman
Sorry about that guys, the links are all fixed now.
Floyd -
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Vimal Kansal
- Posted on: October 19 2000 20:06 EDT
- in response to Floyd Marinescu
I still do not see the links working -
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Gary Steinmetz
- Posted on: October 20 2000 15:10 EDT
- in response to Vimal Kansal
I'd like to read this article too, but the links are still broken. -
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Lee Cardona
- Posted on: March 02 2001 01:45 EST
- in response to Gary Steinmetz
This thread : http://theserverside.com/discussion/thread.jsp?thread_id=4306 might also be of interest in the - J2EE vs M$ .NET debate... -
Microsoft .Net is four years behind Java[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Lee Cardona
- Posted on: March 02 2001 01:48 EST
- in response to Lee Cardona