News: BEA adding Web services to Tuxedo
BEA Systems next week will announce a web services enabled version 8.1 of Tuxedo, its TP monitor which began as an AT&T product before being passed to Novell and finally to BEA in 1996. To enable Web services deployment, BEA is building connectors between Tuxedo and the WebLogic AppServer.
- Posted by: Floyd Marinescu
- Posted on: February 12 2003 11:37 EST
Read BEA adding Web services to Tuxedo and Tuxedo Web Services page.
- Tuxedo will never die! by Marco Campelo on February 12 2003 17:35 EST
- Tuxedo will never die! by Test Dummy on February 13 2003 07:56 EST
Tuxedo will never die!
I can´t believe!
You're damn right it won't. Would you hope for it to die?
I just love Tuxedo. Better than any j2ee stuff - for the backend stuff. Servlets/jsp's/POJO's up front, tx down back, that's Enterprise Solutions for you!
Sure it is...
I agree that a proper enterprise application should have a ligtning fast backend (c++, native database apis, native tp montoring apis) and servlet/jsp/struts/jsf/vb... frontend.
It will be even cool if tux supports Web Services. It will be hands down job to convert current tux-only services to web services.
What did I listen from a BEA consultant?
Move to EJB!
What does tux do better then EJB? What about the performance? Did you do a performance test with both?
You want to compare C++ performance with EJB performace. Shall I say more?
Tuxedo is really lighting fast compared to EJB's. I don't have any metrics, but the difference is clear. Tuxedo's memory footprint is also a fraction of any EJB server (at least the memory-eater weblogic). The service model is a nice one, and the published services are nicely accessible from Java using JOLT.
But if you don't have a platform and are selecting one, beware: tux developers are rare and the programming model is not always that simple. And I guess Tuxedo costs even more than WLS... If I had to start from scratch, I guess I might go for EJB's and JBOSS.