I would like you to tell me what you think about a project I posted on sourceforge.net a few months ago: the JEX project.
see http://jex-project.sourceforge.net
JEX (Java Extension) is a programming language based upon Java with built-in extensibility. With JEX, a project is an XML document describing the various libraries, classes, methods, etc... JEX provides a set of XSLT transformations to generate the Java class files following the JVM specification. JEX programmers can write JEX projects or work at a higher level and provide a XSLT transformation to translate down to the JEX specification (defined by a XML Schema). See the examples with UML and Design Patterns.
I am an old programmer (first started last century in 1980 while at school). I have seen many programming languages passing by and I am tired of rewriting everything from scratch every time.
I would like Java to be the last language. To achive this goal we need a much faster evolution. JEX is here to offer this language evolutivity by letting the programmer add the structures he/she needs - when needed.
Let me know what you think about JEX.
Patrick
-
XML extensibility applied to Java (2 messages)
- Posted by: Patrick Bernard
- Posted on: March 13 2003 15:02 EST
Threaded Messages (2)
- XML extensibility applied to Java by Scott Shaver on March 14 2003 16:47 EST
- Language structure by Patrick Bernard on March 14 2003 17:37 EST
-
XML extensibility applied to Java[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Scott Shaver
- Posted on: March 14 2003 16:47 EST
- in response to Patrick Bernard
Sounds interesting technically. However why not just write libraries and reuse them? Unless you are talking about adding language features such as: Structs, Enums, Generics, etc.
If that is the case then I would argue that any language that allows anyone to add whatever constructs they want at any time is doomed to failure. Because with each change you have created a new language.
MyJex
YouJEx
HisJex
HerJex
blah, blah, blah -
Language structure[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Patrick Bernard
- Posted on: March 14 2003 17:37 EST
- in response to Scott Shaver
So far every major language is defined as a line where each revision (Java1.1, 1.2...) is a point.
My plan is to define the JEX language as a tree. The standard comittee (myself for now) sets the root. Anyone can then draw a line from the root or any existing endpoint to a new point (which defines a new language - simple to learn from the existing origin).
If a branch of the tree gets too heavy (very popular starting point for new projects), the standard comittee will integrate it too the root.
A bit like the internet naming system. A standard instance controls the top level names (.com, .net...). Some other instance defines lower levels (for instance a corporation, can decide to add some specific constructs to Java).
And so on.
I am trying to reduce the stress on programmers by avoiding the jump from a language to the next generation, by making the transition smoother.
Patrick