Discussions

EJB design: WEBLOGIC 5.1 client application error

Bookmark and Share Get thread feed

  1. WEBLOGIC 5.1 client application error (1 messages)

    Hi,

    I am facing problem to run a EJB client. The Beans are deployed on weblogic 5.0 server.

    When i use the following client code :

    Hashtable env = new Hashtable();

    env.put
    (Context.PROVIDER_URL, "t3://localhost:7001");

    env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,"weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory");

    Context ctx = new InitialContext(env);

    it gives an ERROR :

    javax.naming.CommunicationException. Root exception is weblogic.socket.UnrecoverableConnectException: [Login failed: 'Incompatible version:Incompatible versions - this server:5.1.0 client:6.1.1.0]


    I also tried to set the factory to weblogic.jndi.TengahInitialContextFactory but still the same error.

    Can any1 throw somelight on this issue ?

    Regards,
    Dileep
    Reply to this

    Threaded Messages (1)

  2. WEBLOGIC 5.1 client application error[ Go to top ]

    Are you using some client classes from weblogic V6.1 ??

    Looks like you have EJB Bean from Supported to 5.0 Weblogic and client classes coming form weblogic 6.1.1

    CHeers
    Manoj


    > Hi,
    >
    > I am facing problem to run a EJB client. The Beans are deployed on weblogic 5.0 server.
    >
    > When i use the following client code :
    >
    > Hashtable env = new Hashtable();
    >
    > env.put
    > (Context.PROVIDER_URL, "t3://localhost:7001");
    >
    > env.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,"weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory");
    >
    > Context ctx = new InitialContext(env);
    >
    > it gives an ERROR :
    >
    > javax.naming.CommunicationException. Root exception is weblogic.socket.UnrecoverableConnectException: [Login failed: 'Incompatible version:Incompatible versions - this server:5.1.0 client:6.1.1.0]
    >
    >
    > I also tried to set the factory to weblogic.jndi.TengahInitialContextFactory but still the same error.
    >
    > Can any1 throw somelight on this issue ?
    >
    > Regards,
    > Dileep
    Reply to this Reply to original