Denis Piliptchouk has written an article which compares the security features of Java 1.4, and .NET 1.1. This first article in the series delves into Security Configuration and Code Containment. The article is very unbiased, and just goes through the issues without prejudice.
Article Conclusions
"This article covered security configuration issues and different aspects of code containment on .NET and Java platforms. Java offers a lot of advantages with its configurability. When it comes to code containment, both platforms have pretty strong offerings, with .NET having slightly more choices and being more straightforward to use."
Read Java vs. .NET Security, Part 1
-
Article: Security comparison between Java and .NET (8 messages)
- Posted by: Dion Almaer
- Posted on: November 28 2003 11:04 EST
Threaded Messages (8)
- Article: Security comparison between Java and .NET by John Davies on November 29 2003 17:43 EST
- Article: Security comparison between Java and .NET by John Davies on November 29 2003 17:50 EST
-
spell chekcer by Nick Minutello on November 29 2003 06:44 EST
- spell chekcer by John Davies on November 30 2003 04:19 EST
-
spell chekcer by Nick Minutello on November 29 2003 06:44 EST
- Article: Security comparison between Java and .NET by John Davies on November 29 2003 17:50 EST
- Interesting read ... by Pankaj Kumar on December 01 2003 03:09 EST
- Yes, .NET has specific permissions e.g., FilePermission by Gareth Rowlands on December 01 2003 12:33 EST
-
Linux is the perfect security OS - no bugs ever by Ricky Datta on December 02 2003 12:25 EST
- Grow up dude by Ivan Kostenko on December 02 2003 09:53 EST
-
Linux is the perfect security OS - no bugs ever by Ricky Datta on December 02 2003 12:25 EST
- Yes, .NET has specific permissions e.g., FilePermission by Gareth Rowlands on December 01 2003 12:33 EST
-
Article: Security comparison between Java and .NET[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: John Davies
- Posted on: November 29 2003 17:43 EST
- in response to Dion Almaer
It's nice to see something like this on TSS that's not overtly .NET oriented. Pleasently neutralIt's nice to see something like this on TSS that's not overtly .NET oriented. Pleasantly neutral although sadly rather short.
One aspect not covered is the host OS, how does an insecure Java app running on locked down BSD, Solars, AIX, HP-UX, Linux, etc. compare to an insecure .NET app running on one of the .NET platforms, oops I meant "THE" .NET platform.
-John- -
Article: Security comparison between Java and .NET[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: John Davies
- Posted on: November 29 2003 17:50 EST
- in response to John Davies
Sorry about the repeat in the first line (above), I always cut and paste in and out of TSS editor box after spell checking it and missed the first line.
How about a spell checker guys, Jive does it really well.
-John- -
spell chekcer[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Nick Minutello
- Posted on: November 29 2003 18:44 EST
- in response to John Davies
-
spell chekcer[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: John Davies
- Posted on: November 30 2003 16:19 EST
- in response to Nick Minutello
Nick, you should know better!!! "iespell" is for IE, I'd rather read raw HTML than use IE.
-John- -
Interesting read ...[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pankaj Kumar
- Posted on: December 01 2003 03:09 EST
- in response to Dion Almaer
... though bit lacking on insight into how .Net and Java security capabilities compare. I mean, it is nice to know the pathnames of various configuration files under these two systems but what would be more interesting is to know what can be controlled through these configuration files under each of these environments. For example, Under Java, specific types of permissions are defined as part of the library classes (think of FilePermission or SocketPermission) and the policy files can grant these permissions to specific code, specific signed code, a particular logged-in user or any combination of these. Is the basic permission mechanism same in .Net?
Pankaj Kumar
www.j2ee-security.net -
Yes, .NET has specific permissions e.g., FilePermission[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Gareth Rowlands
- Posted on: December 01 2003 12:33 EST
- in response to Pankaj Kumar
Yes, .NET has specific permissions, just like Java. For example, you can grant an assembly Registry permission and then say which keys and whether the access is read only. -
Linux is the perfect security OS - no bugs ever[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Ricky Datta
- Posted on: December 02 2003 00:25 EST
- in response to Gareth Rowlands
-
Grow up dude[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Ivan Kostenko
- Posted on: December 02 2003 09:53 EST
- in response to Ricky Datta
You are also never going to be mentaly dead, EVER.