The Eclipse foundation has released M9, or RC0. According to the plan, the 3.0 release is now in "end game" mode. The new features in this release are many, including uber-CVS abilities, semantic highlighting, code folding, and early access support for JDK 1.5 features.
Read the Eclipse 3.0 M9 Release notes
View the Eclipse 3.0 Endgame Plan
-
Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released (26 messages)
- Posted by: Bill Dudney
- Posted on: May 21 2004 22:22 EDT
Threaded Messages (26)
- Thanks a lot .... by shawn spencer on May 24 2004 12:02 EDT
- Checkstyle plugin by Ronald Tetsuo Miura on May 24 2004 12:28 EDT
-
Folding, ABOUT TIME. by Matthew Wilson on May 24 2004 01:03 EDT
- Precautions by Omair-Inam Abdul-Matin on May 24 2004 01:20 EDT
- Two checkstyle plugins - which one not functioning by Omair-Inam Abdul-Matin on May 24 2004 01:25 EDT
-
Checkstyle plugin by shawn spencer on May 24 2004 01:31 EDT
-
Checkstyle plugin by graham o'regan on May 25 2004 04:23 EDT
- Chill out by Erik Larsson on May 25 2004 07:31 EDT
- Apache is just as good if not better by Tochi Tochi on May 25 2004 08:58 EDT
-
Checkstyle plugin by graham o'regan on May 25 2004 04:23 EDT
- solareclipse_0.4.1 not compatible with xerces_4.0.13 by Yu-Xue Liu on July 15 2004 12:00 EDT
-
Folding, ABOUT TIME. by Matthew Wilson on May 24 2004 01:03 EDT
- Checkstyle plugin by Ronald Tetsuo Miura on May 24 2004 12:28 EDT
- "Retro" look comes back by Omair-Inam Abdul-Matin on May 24 2004 13:30 EDT
- Auto Update of core eclipse by Michael Rasmussen on May 24 2004 15:18 EDT
- Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released by jason priestly on May 25 2004 01:51 EDT
- Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released by Ruslan Zenin on May 25 2004 01:51 EDT
- Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released by Te Vo on May 25 2004 02:13 EDT
- M9 and sysdeo tomcat plugin by Sheng Wei on May 25 2004 10:04 EDT
- M9 and sysdeo tomcat plugin by Donald Diego on May 26 2004 10:05 EDT
- Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released by dav kh on May 25 2004 13:45 EDT
- netbeans = slowest IDe on earh and Mars by shawn spencer on May 27 2004 13:10 EDT
- Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released by J. X. on May 25 2004 16:44 EDT
- Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released by J. X. on May 25 2004 16:53 EDT
- Still only a single f'n row of editor tabs!!! by Nathaniel Auvil on May 25 2004 20:55 EDT
- Still only a single f'n row of editor tabs!!! by Twice Tshwenyane on May 26 2004 02:26 EDT
- 50 percent right by John Rubier on May 26 2004 04:13 EDT
- Still only a single f'n row of editor tabs!!! by Marcus Howarth on May 28 2004 05:25 EDT
- Still only a single f'n row of editor tabs!!! by Twice Tshwenyane on May 26 2004 02:26 EDT
- Thank you Eclipse team! by Erik Larsson on May 26 2004 06:01 EDT
-
Thanks a lot ....[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: shawn spencer
- Posted on: May 24 2004 12:02 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
You guys and Apache group are best. -
Checkstyle plugin[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Ronald Tetsuo Miura
- Posted on: May 24 2004 12:28 EDT
- in response to shawn spencer
It's not an Apache project...
By the way, the checkstyle plugin won't work out-of-the-box. You'll have to copy the plugins/org.apache.xerces_4.0.13 folder from M7/M8 to M9, since it has been removed in this release. -
Folding, ABOUT TIME.[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Matthew Wilson
- Posted on: May 24 2004 13:03 EDT
- in response to Ronald Tetsuo Miura
I am glad to finally see folding. Good job:) -
Precautions[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Omair-Inam Abdul-Matin
- Posted on: May 24 2004 13:20 EDT
- in response to Matthew Wilson
If you're not doing that already, be sure to back up your .metadata folder in your workspace directory and export your preferences to a file and then import them after running M9.
Currently it appears that CDT and AJDT will not work with M9. Does anyone known if Omondo UML Enterprise Edition is supported by M9? -
Two checkstyle plugins - which one not functioning[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Omair-Inam Abdul-Matin
- Posted on: May 24 2004 13:25 EDT
- in response to Ronald Tetsuo Miura
There are two checkstyle plugins... which one are you referring to (or will both of them not work)
I digress here, but do you have a preference between the two plugins in terms of features? -
Checkstyle plugin[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: shawn spencer
- Posted on: May 24 2004 13:31 EDT
- in response to Ronald Tetsuo Miura
It's not an Apache project...By the way, the checkstyle plugin won't work out-of-the-box. You'll have to copy the plugins/org.apache.xerces_4.0.13 folder from M7/M8 to M9, since it has been removed in this release.
I know that. I said you guys ( meaning eclipse) and apache guys are the best.
Dont think too much. just let it go ... -
Checkstyle plugin[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: graham o'regan
- Posted on: May 25 2004 04:23 EDT
- in response to shawn spencer
Are you serious? Eclipse is used in a production environment world-wide, and continues to get better with every release. New releases don't break your existing builds and the project is well documented. How is this in any way similar to Apache? -
Chill out[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Erik Larsson
- Posted on: May 25 2004 07:31 EDT
- in response to graham o'regan
The original poster where referring to the Apache group (www.apache.org). They have without doubts created some pretty serious and helpfull stuff. As the Eclipse group are.
That was all that was said from the original poster and to that I can only agree wholeheartedly. -
Apache is just as good if not better[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Tochi Tochi
- Posted on: May 25 2004 08:58 EDT
- in response to graham o'regan
Are you serious? Eclipse is used in a production environment world-wide, and continues to get better with every release. New releases don't break your existing builds and the project is well documented. How is this in any way similar to Apache?
The height of the arrogance of some individuals of this community boggles the mind !!!. I consider it a compliment on the part of the Eclipse team to be compared with such a great group as Apache.
The scoffers should consider that Apache does not have the benefit of a super sugardaddy that Eclipse enjoys (even though its been set free of late its still got as much independence as a supermarket trolley).
Maybe when Eclipse can hold a candle to Intellij and even Jbuilder (foundation) and prove as indispensable as Apache then its supporters can scoff, till then they should do us a favour and shut their arrogant gob. -
solareclipse_0.4.1 not compatible with xerces_4.0.13[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Yu-Xue Liu
- Posted on: July 15 2004 00:00 EDT
- in response to Ronald Tetsuo Miura
Hi :
I downloaded the solareclipse_0.4.1 for jsp/XML. But if plugins exist xerces_4.0.13, the Eclipse 3.0 could not open the jsp/XMl files. Please help me.
Best Regards,
Hiko 2004/07/15 -
"Retro" look comes back[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Omair-Inam Abdul-Matin
- Posted on: May 24 2004 13:30 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
Good news for those of us who preferred the old interface. It's now possible to select between the old and new interface. To get the old look just go to Workbench > Appearance > and change the Current Presentation preference setting to "R21Presentation". -
Auto Update of core eclipse[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Michael Rasmussen
- Posted on: May 24 2004 15:18 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
I can't seem to get it to work just now...probably from the huge number of people hitting the eclipse site...but it appears that there is support for updating the core functionality of eclipse through eclipse update manager. Yippie. Now if this runs in the background it will be wonderful.
Michael -
Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: jason priestly
- Posted on: May 25 2004 01:51 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
I'm still missing proper tab indenting. It's not working properly and the Eclipse developers have a
hard time understanding the problem. They say: "It's actually not broken but works as designed."
http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=45499 -
Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Ruslan Zenin
- Posted on: May 25 2004 01:51 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
Can it work with file system?
I just tried it. It seems to create its own copy of source files somewhere in workspace. Is it true, or just my observation?
I'm using JBuilder and used to the fact that I have control over my *.java fiels.
Also, Eclipse 2.1.3 has no such problems and has references to the existing *.java files (instead of copying).
Anyone can explain the diff between Eclipse 2.x and 3.x? -
Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Te Vo
- Posted on: May 25 2004 02:13 EDT
- in response to Ruslan Zenin
I just tried it. It seems to create its own copy of source files somewhere in workspace. Is it true, or just my observation?
Use "Create project at external location". -
M9 and sysdeo tomcat plugin[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Sheng Wei
- Posted on: May 25 2004 10:04 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
Yesterday (2004-05-24) I spent a whole afternoon working with M9 and sysdeo tomcat plugin. The result is disappointed.
M8 supports sysdeo-Tomcat-PluginV221.zip with jakarta-tomcat-4.1.30 and everything seems fine. But M9 does not work with sysdeo-Tomcat-PluginV221.zip.
I searched and found sysdeo delivered another two packages to support M9:
- com.sysdeo.eclipse.tomcat_2.2.1-je1-3M9.zip
- com.sysdeo.eclipse.tomcat_3.0.0.alpha1
Then I can install plugin in M9 and do configurations.
But unfortunately, when I set breakpoints in Servlet or JSP generated Servlet, eclipse M9 seems to stop or step on in debugging, but without any highlight of line and no mouse tips of variables.
What changes make M9 being so imcompatible with sysdeo tomcat plugin?? Although a lot of features are attrative, but when doing web application development, I have to revert back to former version of eclipse.
Sheng -
M9 and sysdeo tomcat plugin[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Donald Diego
- Posted on: May 26 2004 10:05 EDT
- in response to Sheng Wei
Keep in mind that these are not final releases, they are considered stable integration builds. Eclipse has not been guaranteeing compatibility between M-releases, because the 3.0 release is in development. From M9 on to the final release, no new features are supposed to be added, so there's a good chance now that what works with M9 will work up to and including the final release, but there still are no guarantees.
Just pointing out that it's not a fault of Eclipse that plugins that tried to keep up with the M-releases break after another M. Of course, it'd be nice if it was designed that way, but I think they like refactoring too much... =) -
Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: dav kh
- Posted on: May 25 2004 13:45 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
Honestly I cannot understand why some of java developers love eclipse so much. I know that its free, there are so much plug-in (free and commercial). I think netbeans 3.6 is better in many aspects (at least when you got it you can start your work.). I myself use jbuilder X.
And currently with jdk 1.5 there is not a big different between swt and swing except that swt is not standard and i like swing so much. -
netbeans = slowest IDe on earh and Mars[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: shawn spencer
- Posted on: May 27 2004 13:10 EDT
- in response to dav kh
it sucks -
Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: J. X.
- Posted on: May 25 2004 16:44 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
Still can't configure to use DOS or UNIX eol. The original bug was submitted in 2001 (yes THREE years ago in an Internet age), and has since kept been pushed back. It severely discourages any team that need to work on hetrogenous development platforms from using Eclipse. It's ironical to see so many team oriented features added to Eclipse in all these years, yet such a fundamental issue has been around almost long enough to qualify for an IBM long-term service award. -
Eclipse 3.0 M9 (a.k.a RC 0) Released[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: J. X.
- Posted on: May 25 2004 16:53 EDT
- in response to J. X.
Just wanted to add that, while being frustrated about the EOL bug, I still very much liked M9. Folding is very nice. -
Still only a single f'n row of editor tabs!!![ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Nathaniel Auvil
- Posted on: May 25 2004 20:55 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
How can they possibly only have a single row of editor tabs!?!?!? And now it automatically closes files!?!? I dont' get it. -
Still only a single f'n row of editor tabs!!![ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Twice Tshwenyane
- Posted on: May 26 2004 02:26 EDT
- in response to Nathaniel Auvil
How can they possibly only have a single row of editor tabs!?!?!? And now it automatically closes files!?!? I dont' get it.
Exactly and that's very annoying. But otherwise hopefully it will be much better than M8 which let me down on few occasssions. -
50 percent right[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: John Rubier
- Posted on: May 26 2004 04:13 EDT
- in response to Twice Tshwenyane
You can turn off the editor closing in Preferences->Workbench->Editors...uncheck "Close editors automatically".
Can't help with the other problem...ctrl-e or ctrl-shift-e is your friend? ;) -
Still only a single f'n row of editor tabs!!![ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Marcus Howarth
- Posted on: May 28 2004 05:25 EDT
- in response to Twice Tshwenyane
I've got quite used to it, when it becomes unclear remember you can Ctrl + F6 to bring up the editer list and select from there, and it quite intelligently places recently used files close to hand :)How can they possibly only have a single row of editor tabs!?!?!? And now it automatically closes files!?!? I dont' get it.
Exactly and that's very annoying. But otherwise hopefully it will be much better than M8 which let me down on few occasssions.
Well done Eclipse team - you've alot of fans in this office! -
Thank you Eclipse team![ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Erik Larsson
- Posted on: May 26 2004 06:01 EDT
- in response to Bill Dudney
1. Just gotta say that the new syntax coloring features kicks major ass. Just as an example, to always be aware if a variable in a method is class wide, locally declared or method parameter by their colours is a major improvement. Another example, higligting all exit points (returns) with bright red makes you cringe for every method that does not have a single exit point. Almost forces you to rewrite the method just by the look of it.
2. The level to which you can make the compiler scream for incorrect coding practises and errors just amazes me. Just crank every setting as high as possible and watch the problem bar fill with incorrect coding practises. Well, already done that with earlier versions, otherwise... Hmmmm. I just might pull down some Apache project and import it just for the fun of it to see what the compiler will discover...
3. Refactoring - As always, state of the art