Cenqua is proud to announce the public beta release of Fisheye, a unified repository viewer.
FishEye unlocks the data within your CVS repository and provides easy navigation, powerful search, historical reports, advanced file annotation and diff, change-set analysis, RSS feeds, and integration with your issue tracker. Many more features are planned, including support for other SCM systems.
Fisheye does all this and without getting in your way. It is easy to install, and runs fast. Fisheye is a 100% pure Java application.
Our users have told us that Fisheye's features are addictive. If you use CVS, find out what FishEye can do for you.
Download a free, fully functional evaluation version:
http://www.cenqua.com/download.jspa
Read more about Fisheye features:
http://www.cenqua.com/fisheye/
Play with the online demo:
http://fisheye.cenqua.com/
We happily support Open Source software and invite Open Source projects to apply for a free license for Fisheye:
http://www.cenqua.com/freelicenserequest!default.jspa
Regards,
The Cenqua Team
-
Using CVS? Checkout Fisheye, now available for download (23 messages)
- Posted by: Brendan Humphreys
- Posted on: October 20 2004 09:15 EDT
Threaded Messages (23)
- Using SVN instead? by Turadg Aleahmad on October 21 2004 12:38 EDT
- Using SVN instead? by han theman on October 21 2004 19:03 EDT
- Multi-SCM support by Brendan Humphreys on October 21 2004 09:15 EDT
- cleared by matt coleman on December 27 2012 08:56 EST
- Using SVN instead? by han theman on October 21 2004 19:03 EDT
- A free alternative to fisheye by Justin Chang on October 21 2004 22:13 EDT
- A free alternative to fisheye by Stephane Bailliez on October 22 2004 06:58 EDT
- Another alternative by Paul Craven on October 22 2004 09:26 EDT
- Another alternative by Brendan Humphreys on October 24 2004 08:57 EDT
- Happy with CVS ? why bother to spend time & money by sean decor on October 22 2004 02:05 EDT
- Great tool by Peter Mergaerts on October 22 2004 02:36 EDT
- Following the rabbit trail... by Mark N on October 22 2004 07:35 EDT
- Great tool by bruno chevalier on October 22 2004 07:37 EDT
- Great tool by Brendan Humphreys on October 22 2004 08:05 EDT
- Using CVS? Checkout Fisheye, now available for download by NullPtr ! on October 23 2004 01:03 EDT
- Using CVS? Checkout Fisheye, now available for download by Thies Edeling on October 23 2004 15:05 EDT
- Using CVS? Checkout Fisheye, now available for download by Nick Minutello on October 25 2004 18:26 EDT
- Using CVS? Checkout Fisheye, now available for download by NullPtr ! on October 25 2004 10:37 EDT
- We're happy with Fisheye by Tom Davies on October 24 2004 18:57 EDT
- re: search functionality? by Christophe Chuvan on October 25 2004 01:57 EDT
- re: search functionality? by Matt Quail on October 25 2004 02:47 EDT
-
re: search functionality? by Christophe Chuvan on October 25 2004 03:00 EDT
- re: search functionality? by Brendan Humphreys on October 25 2004 09:25 EDT
-
re: search functionality? by Christophe Chuvan on October 25 2004 03:00 EDT
- re: search functionality? by Matt Quail on October 25 2004 02:47 EDT
- hi by l esca on December 26 2012 03:33 EST
-
Using SVN instead?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Turadg Aleahmad
- Posted on: October 21 2004 12:38 EDT
- in response to Brendan Humphreys
The inevitable question is, "When will FishEye support Subversion?"
This thread seems to have the answer:
<We are working hard towards multi-SCM support, and Subversion will be at the head of the pack. But our current timeframe puts a beta with Subversion support late this year or early next year.
=Matt
FishEye Support
>> -
Using SVN instead?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: han theman
- Posted on: October 21 2004 19:03 EDT
- in response to Turadg Aleahmad
The inevitable question is, "When will FishEye support Subversion?"This thread seems to have the answer:<<We are working hard towards multi-SCM support, and Subversion will be at the head of the pack. But our current timeframe puts a beta with Subversion support late this year or early next year.=MattFishEye Support>>
But why bother with "multi-SCM" supporting CVS when CVS will be dead within a year or two (as subversion is rapidly taking over the world.) Well... almost dead. -
Multi-SCM support[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Brendan Humphreys
- Posted on: October 21 2004 21:15 EDT
- in response to han theman
Hi,
We aim to support many flavours of SCM, not just CVS and SVN. ClearCase and Perforce are two others we are a investigating.
Cheers,
-Brendan
http://www.cenqua.com -
cleared[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: matt coleman
- Posted on: December 27 2012 08:56 EST
- in response to Turadg Aleahmad
thanks for clearing this up Turadg
-
A free alternative to fisheye[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Justin Chang
- Posted on: October 21 2004 22:13 EDT
- in response to Brendan Humphreys
Hi,
It seems fisheye is commercial. :(
However, there is a wonderful alternative--CVSMonitor.
It's written in Perl, and the installation is not very convinient for Perl beginner. After several days' play with it,
I found its changeset search functionality is especially useful. So if you cares changeset, unfortunately cvs doesn't support, you can checkout CVSMonitor at http://ali.as/devel/cvsmonitor/
Justin -
A free alternative to fisheye[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Stephane Bailliez
- Posted on: October 22 2004 06:58 EDT
- in response to Justin Chang
It seems fisheye is commercial. :(
Well, I'm glad you can work for free and don't have any source of revenue, but people working on that have to make a living and this is not like support will be a major source of revenue for this type of product, so it has to be license.
I think Fisheye is an excellent product. All in all it is a matter of 5 minutes to deploy it any environment and the information is very well presented (and sexy, which is important as well). The only thing missing is SVN support, but there are still load of projects (commercial or not) using CVS as SVN support is not yet available everywhere even though it is catching fast. -
Another alternative[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Paul Craven
- Posted on: October 22 2004 09:26 EDT
- in response to Justin Chang
Another free alternative:
http://cvschangelogb.sourceforge.net/
CVS Change Log Builder is pretty nice. The Fisheye product looks better, but not enough to make it worth dropping a grand on. -
Another alternative[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Brendan Humphreys
- Posted on: October 24 2004 20:57 EDT
- in response to Paul Craven
Hi Paul,
I just want to point out a major difference between Fisheye and tools such as cvschangelogbuilder and statcvs. Both these free tools do a great job producing reports of CVS activity. However these types of tools produce "static" reports. To get an updated report you need to re-run the tool. The result is a series of static html reports capturing the state of the repository when the tool was run.
Fisheye is different because, after an initial scan of your repository, it produces these types of reports interactively, in realtime. In this sense, Fisheye reports are "live", rather than a static snapshot.
Fisheye is interactive in that you can browse and see activity at any node in your repository, and apply various constraints (Branch, date, tag, author) while doing so. And because Fisheye intelligently monitors your repository, new check-ins are instantly reflected in Fisheye.
Cheers,
-Brendan
http://www.cenqua.com -
Happy with CVS ? why bother to spend time & money[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: sean decor
- Posted on: October 22 2004 02:05 EDT
- in response to Brendan Humphreys
no point wasting money on this. if u have to waste some money then u have perforce - very strong and robust. -
Great tool[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Peter Mergaerts
- Posted on: October 22 2004 02:36 EDT
- in response to Brendan Humphreys
We used it for 2 months, and it's really fantastic. Very simpel setup, and some great intuitive features.
(Unfortunatly, we've moved all our CVS repositories to SVN..., so we have to wait a few months before we can enjoy FishEye again... :( )
Merg -
Following the rabbit trail...[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Mark N
- Posted on: October 22 2004 07:35 EDT
- in response to Peter Mergaerts
Anyone used the Eclipse SVN plugin? How does it compare to the builtin CVS one? (Yes I know about the standalone tools) -
Great tool[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: bruno chevalier
- Posted on: October 22 2004 07:37 EDT
- in response to Peter Mergaerts
Did you pay 999$ for a beta version?!?
I am very surprised to have to pay for a beta version and to help the company to debug the product.
I hope it is a really great tool in order to survive to tough competitors like free products like cvs (http://www.gnu.org/software/cvs/) and some other commercial products like Rational clearcase.
Best regards,
Bruno CHEVALIER -
Great tool[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Brendan Humphreys
- Posted on: October 22 2004 08:05 EDT
- in response to bruno chevalier
Hi Bruno,
Just to clarify:
1. Beta testers participated in the initial beta trial free of charge.
2. Fisheye is not a Version Control System like CVS or Clearcase. Instead, Fisheye is designed to complement your Version Control System by providing enhanced search, aggregated statistics, changeset analysis, RSS feeds etc. At the moment Fisheye only supports CVS, but we intend to support Clearcase in the near future.
Cheers,
-Brendan
http://www.cenqua.com -
Using CVS? Checkout Fisheye, now available for download[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: NullPtr !
- Posted on: October 23 2004 01:03 EDT
- in response to Brendan Humphreys
I am curious as to how many people would purchase a commercial product to complement an open source product. -
Using CVS? Checkout Fisheye, now available for download[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Thies Edeling
- Posted on: October 23 2004 15:05 EDT
- in response to NullPtr !
It's not that strange, how many people buy support on their open source OS? -
Using CVS? Checkout Fisheye, now available for download[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Nick Minutello
- Posted on: October 25 2004 18:26 EDT
- in response to NullPtr !
I am curious as to how many people would purchase a commercial product to complement an open source product.
Why wouldnt you??
Its not like its that expensive. And its useful!
Would you prefer an open-souce tool to complement commercial (expensive!) Rational Clearcase? :-)
-Nick -
Using CVS? Checkout Fisheye, now available for download[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: NullPtr !
- Posted on: October 25 2004 22:37 EDT
- in response to Nick Minutello
Would you prefer an open-souce tool to complement commercial (expensive!) Rational Clearcase? :-)-Nick
Sure....why not?? Wouldnt you :))) -
We're happy with Fisheye[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Tom Davies
- Posted on: October 24 2004 18:57 EDT
- in response to Brendan Humphreys
We've been using the private betas for a few months and have been very happy.
The betas have been solid, and we find it very useful. The query language for selecting sets of changes is very powerful, installation is simple, and you can configure Fisheye to produce links back to your issue management system (e.g. Jira). In fact Jira also produces links to Fisheye, giving complete bidirectional integartion between your issues and the changes you made to solve them! -
re: search functionality?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Christophe Chuvan
- Posted on: October 25 2004 01:57 EDT
- in response to Brendan Humphreys
I played with your online demo of Fisheye and one thing that seriously rocks is the quick search. I can see how that would be a major timesaver when finding files, but it didn't seem to support searching the actual contents of files (only filenames and checkin comments). Is this something Fisheye is going to support? -
re: search functionality?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Matt Quail
- Posted on: October 25 2004 02:47 EDT
- in response to Christophe Chuvan
... but it didn't seem to support searching the actual contents of files (only filenames and checkin comments). Is this something Fisheye is going to support?
Absolutely. We actually have plans for some fairly funky file-contents based searches. As well as searching the HEAD of each file, you could also search the diffs. For example, you could search for when a TODO comment was added or removed from a file.
=Matt
http://www.cenqua.com/ -
re: search functionality?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Christophe Chuvan
- Posted on: October 25 2004 03:00 EDT
- in response to Matt Quail
... but it didn't seem to support searching the actual contents of files (only filenames and checkin comments). Is this something Fisheye is going to support?
Absolutely. We actually have plans for some fairly funky file-contents based searches. As well as searching the HEAD of each file, you could also search the diffs. For example, you could search for when a TODO comment was added or removed from a file.=Matthttp://www.cenqua.com/
How about binary files? i.e. PDFs, Word documents, etc? -
re: search functionality?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Brendan Humphreys
- Posted on: October 25 2004 09:25 EDT
- in response to Christophe Chuvan
Hi Christophe,
How about binary files? i.e. PDFs, Word documents, etc?... but it didn't seem to support searching the actual contents of files (only filenames and checkin comments). Is this something Fisheye is going to support?
Absolutely. We actually have plans for some fairly funky file-contents based searches. As well as searching the HEAD of each file, you could also search the diffs. For example, you could search for when a TODO comment was added or removed from a file.=Matthttp://www.cenqua.com/
Fisheye 1.0 will not support searching the contents of non-text files. We do have that planned as a feature to be implemented post-1.0
Cheers,
-Brendan
http://www.cenqua.com -
hi[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: l esca
- Posted on: December 26 2012 03:33 EST
- in response to Brendan Humphreys
Fisheye is so cool