|
Sponsored Links
Resources
Enterprise Java
Research Library
Get Java white papers, product information, case studies and webcasts
|
General J2EE
General J2EE
General J2EE
|
Messages: 0
Messages: 0
Messages: 0
Printer friendly
Printer friendly
Printer friendly
Post reply
Post reply
Post reply
XML
XML
XML
|
 |
What every developer should know about time
from my blog What every developer should know about time
With daylight savings time ending today, I thought this was a good time for a post. How to handle time is one of those tricky issues where it is all too easy to get it wrong. So let's dive in.
First off, using UTC (also known as Greenwich Mean Time) is many times not the correct solution. Yet many programmers think if they store everything that way, then they have it covered. (This mistake is why several years ago when Congress changed the start of DST in the U.S. you had to run a hotfix on Outlook for it to adjust reoccurring events.)
So let's start with the key question – what do we mean by time? When a user says they want something to run at 7:00 am, what do they mean? In most cases they mean 7:00 am where they are located – but not always. In some cases, to accurately compare say web server statistics, they want each "day" to end at the same time, unadjusted for DST. At the other end, someone who takes medicine at certain times of the day and has that set in their calendar, will want that to always be on local time so a 3:00pm event is not 3:00am when they have travelled half way around the world.
So we have three main use cases here (there are some others, but they can generally be handled by the following):- The same absolute (for lack of a better word) time.
- The time in a given time zone, shifting when DST goes on/off (including double DST which occurs in some regions).
- The local time.
The first is trivial to handle – you set it as UTC. By doing this every day of the year will have 24 hours. (Interesting note, UTC only matches the time in Greenwich during standard time. When it is DST there, Greenwich and UTC are not identical.)
The second requires storing a time and a time zone. However, the time zone is the geographical zone, not the present offset (offset is the difference with UTC). In other words, you store "Mountain Time," not "Mountain Standard Time" or "Mountain Daylight Savings Time." So 7:00 am in "Mountain Time" will be 7:00 am in Colorado regardless of the time of year.
The third is similar to the second in that it has a time zone called "Local Time." However, it requires knowing what time zone it is in in order to determine when it occurs.
Outlook now has a means to handle this. Click the Time Zones button:
click here
And you can now set the time zone for each event:
click here
When I have business trips I use this including my flight times departing in one zone and arriving in another. Outlook displays everything in the local timezone and adjusts when that changes. The iPhone on the other hand has no idea this is going on and has everything off when I'm on a trip that is in another timezone (and when you live in Colorado, almost every trip is to another timezone).
Putting it to use
Ok, so how do you handle this? It's actually pretty simple. Every time needs to be stored one of two ways: - As UTC. Generally when stored as UTC, you will still set/display it in local time.
- As a datetime plus a geographical timezone (which can be "local time").
Now the trick is knowing which to use. Here are some general rules. You will need to figure this out for additional use cases, but most do fall in to these categories. - When something happened – UTC. This is a singular event and regardless of how the user wants it displayed, when it occurred is unchangeable.
- When the user selects a timezone of UTC – UTC.
- An event in the future where the user wants it to occur in a timezone – datetime plus a timezone. Now it might be safe to use UTC if it will occur in the next several months (changing timezones generally have that much warning), but at some point out you need to do this, so you should do it for all cases. In this case you display what you stored.
- For a scheduled event, when it will next happen – UTC. This is a performance requirement where you want to be able to get all "next events" where their runtime is before now. Much faster to search against dates than recalculate each one. However, this does need to recalculate all scheduled events regularly in case the rules have changed for an event that runs every quarter.
- For events that are on "local time" the recalculation should occur anytime the user's timezone changes. And if an event is skipped in the change, it needs to occur immediately.
Browser pain
The one thing we have not figured out is how to know a user's location if they are using a browser to hit our web application. For most countries the locale can be used to determine the timezone – but not for the U.S. (6 zones), Canada, or Russia (11 zones). So you have to ask a user to set their timezone – and to change it when they travel. If anyone knows of a solution to this, please let me know.
Did I miss anything?
If I missed an interesting use case, please let me know. Comments as always are very welcome at my blog What every developer should know about time
|
|
|
|
Hot threads
Hot threads
Hot threads
|
More hot threads
More hot threads
More hot threads
|
|
Brian Goetz continues to lift the lid and peak into the inner workings of Java in Java Urban Performance Legends. In this article he exposes the fallacy behind some of the more common performance myths found in the annals of the JVM.
(93 comments,
last posted
February 06, 2009)
Bruce Tate, author of Better, Faster Lighter Java and Bitter EJB has come out with a new book called Beyond Java. Bruce has an epiphany about the future of software development. Does it include Java?
(770 comments,
last posted
September 23, 2009)
Looks like today AJAX concept have several interpretations. We can distinguish different approaches of AJAX integration. Can they co-exist within the same application? Can we talk about layered AJAX integration?
(68 comments,
last posted
May 08, 2008)
Artima has published a short article describing the Design-Time API for JavaBeans, which was recently approved as JSR 273. This API promises to bring VB-like ease to Java development, but may face a cultural bias among Java developers who tend to think more in terms of class libraries than components.
(225 comments,
last posted
November 19, 2009)
There is plenty of speculation today regarding a potential buyout of Sun Microsystems by Scott McNealy and Silver Lake Partners. How would privatization of Sun affect Java?
(16 comments,
last posted
May 15, 2009)
More hot threads »
|
|
