<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - EJB CMP 2.0 performances flaw</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:05:05 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>EJB CMP 2.0 performances flaw</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=12476</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I have a survey that proves EJB 2.0 can handle 1,000 users, and mine only costs $1,000!
<br>
<br>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2002 04:29:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2002 04:29:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2002 04:29:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 24, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Mattox</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB CMP 2.0 performances flaw</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=12476</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[They're running the Oracle 8.1.6 database on a Bi Xeon / 320 Mo Ram 2-400 MHz Windows NT4 server. I don't think the driver is involved here as I used it many times for other applications and never came across any pb with that....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2002 07:27:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2002 07:27:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2002 07:27:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 18, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guillaume Roche</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB CMP 2.0 performances flaw</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=12476</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This is simply not true.  With the introduction of abstract accessors, the container can implement eager/lazy-loading strategies. This means that the container can load in just a few queries (usually one) all of the data required for a transaction.  I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:46:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:46:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2002 14:46:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 17, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dain Sundstrom</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB CMP 2.0 performances flaw</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=12476</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I believe that Sun only defined the spec of CMP2. It's the container providers who implement the underlying mechanism. And I don't think EJB1.1's performance can be any better than EJB2. In fact, WLS 6.1 is what you said &quot;a J2EE 1.2 application...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:14:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:14:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 21:14:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 14, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dright Ho</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB CMP 2.0 performances flaw</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=12476</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[One of France's most prominent computer science magazine titled in his last issue: &quot;J2EE makes the e-business edifice stumble&quot;. That's no good news....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:45:11 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:45:11 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 12:45:11 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 14, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guillaume Roche</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

