<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Article: Open source workflow and the BPM-market</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:58:42 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>One year and a half after still is true</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Some time has passed, and still there is a fight on the candidates to become a standard language for process definition. In this time BPEL has gained importance, but there are still doubts on which one will become the defacto standard.<br><br>Lucas...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:50:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:50:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:50:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 1, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Lucas Rodr??guez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>We are using OfBiz</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We are trying to build identify a good Open Source engine for a large organization....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:07:08 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:07:08 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:07:08 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 26, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>prashanth jade</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Some more on IBM MQSeries Workflow</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[MQSeries workflow was built to be used for People workflow, What i mean by people workflow is that, a process is started and the forms will pop-up to different people in the ogranisation. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:34:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:34:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:34:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 26, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sam S</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Home grown workflow</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[A couple years ago I tried BEA process integrator. It was terrible, because it was syncronious - the client (application) had to wait (thread was locked) while server handled his reponce. I think it was improved. Another problem was with data flow - all...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 04:18:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 04:18:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 04:18:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 26, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alexander Titov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Home grown workflow</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It's interesting to read such experiences about IBM Workflow.. it adds another proof that companies rather keep on pushing their own products to get market share on a raising market than trying to create something usable. (See the article at <a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 03:30:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 03:30:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 03:30:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 26, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kristof Jozsa</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>It seems to be working out ok</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We are using the osworkflow at our office. but we are having to build\...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:19:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:19:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:19:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 25, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dheeraj Ravula</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Home grown workflow</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We evaluated IBM WOrkflow 3.3 last year in March, Our requiremet was System workflow for backend integration for the Ordering System(Telecom networks). We found that IBM Workflow XML interface was not-so-mature. There were some bugs too and It was...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:30:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:30:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:30:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 25, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sam S</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Workflow targets</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[snip...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:09:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:09:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:09:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 25, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>kurt ostbahn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Workflow targets</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Tom,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:07:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:07:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:07:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 25, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pradeep Sekar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Insurance</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[BPM is an emerging technology in the market for insurance and specifically commercial insurance where the nature of dynamic workflows is not as routine as the repeatable processes of personal insurance.  Claims is a good example of traditional workflow...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:55:50 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:55:50 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:55:50 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 25, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Edens</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Workflow targets</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Pradeep,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:53:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:53:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:53:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 25, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Baeyens</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Workflow targets</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Excellent article!! I think the article serves its intended purpose very well....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 04:38:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 04:38:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 04:38:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 25, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pradeep Sekar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why is WfMC compliancy a benefit ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The WfMC spec has received critisism of being vague.  Which results very different engines being able to claim that they support the same standard. So portability would is not really a benefit of such a standard....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 04:34:04 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 04:34:04 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 04:34:04 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 25, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Baeyens</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>We are using OfBiz</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[After evaluating no of open source workflow engine, we found Ofbiz to be quite suitable as per our needs....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 03:33:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 03:33:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 03:33:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 25, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>umesh khandelwal</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>BPEL4WS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=18436</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[BPEL4WS seems to be emerging as the dominant flow language. It might result in providing portability across orchestration engines (similar to what SQL offered for data management and query)....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:32:11 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:32:11 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:32:11 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 24, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Edwin Khodabakchian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

