<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Value Object Dispatcher Pattern (Revised)</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:18:56 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Tweaked</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I have since incorporated Spring into the design along with hibernate so I was able to remove the caching stuff and just use the name of the key class as the lookup for the controller / dao.  It is much simpler now and works pretty slick.  Sorry I didn't...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:36:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:36:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:36:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 26, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nic Holbrook</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Updated pattern for better dto relationships</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It looks nice! But I've some doubts!<br><br>1 - I'm not sure if I understand why the setControllerClass() is in the PK!<br><br>2 - Why do you use the fully qualified name of the controler class instead of its Class object?<br><br>Thx<br><br>EMCAO]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:45:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:45:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:45:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 19, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eduardo Oliveira</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Updated pattern for better dto relationships</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Here is an example of how my value objects / keys relate and have been redone as well as a new MutableVOController interface, MutableVO, Key, and CacheableKey.  As everybody knows, new architectures are always a work in progress.  I have also modified...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:26:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:26:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:26:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 22, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nic Holbrook</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>question on corefacadebean</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[They all implement the interface so that you are sure to be able to utilize the dao methods from wherever you are.  From proxy, you should just need to say proxy.insert(valueObject) and it should be able to pass through the architecture and be inserted...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:13:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:13:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:13:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 22, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nic Holbrook</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>question on corefacadebean</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[why would the CoreBusinessMethods and hence the CoreFacade session bean extend/implement the VOController? Isn't the facade supposed to use DAO? or was it meant to be Entity? I think I am missing something?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:06:52 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:06:52 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:06:52 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 14, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sudharshan Krishnamachary</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Coarse grained VOs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am going to implement framework based on this design pattern....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2003 04:40:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2003 04:40:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2003 04:40:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 22, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Coarse grained VOs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This is not meant to be exact code....  Just an example....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 12:14:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 12:14:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 12:14:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 28, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nic Holbrook</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Coarse grained VOs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[That is all controlled within the DAO.  The VO is just the transport mechanism.  The DAO is the controller class for the VO.  You can pull from 5 tables if you want and assign the data to the VO when you build it.  I have used queries with joins in...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 12:00:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 12:00:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 12:00:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 28, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nic Holbrook</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Coarse grained VOs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[How can this be extended to make the VOs coarse grained to make them capable of utilizing multiple tables?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 10:40:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 10:40:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 10:40:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 28, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kesara Kudalugodaarachchi</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>sample implementation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[public CMPUserDAO extends AbstractDAO...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 18:04:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 18:04:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 18:04:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 13, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nic Holbrook</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>sample implementation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Can we have have its sample implementation]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 08:24:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 08:24:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 08:24:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rohit Singh</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>That shouldn't be any problem</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The way I have tried to set this up is that if you decide to use cmp entity beans, the DAO at that point becomes a wrapper.  You still have the call through the system, and the DAO then makes the calls into the cmp bean and does the data translation...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2003 12:56:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 08 May 2003 12:56:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 08 May 2003 12:56:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 8, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nic Holbrook</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>CMP2 finder methods?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Can you still use the J2EE container's CMP2 xml-configured finders for entity attributes?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2003 14:29:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 07 May 2003 14:29:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 07 May 2003 14:29:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 7, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>paul m</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I probably could have worded it that way</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I was thinking &quot;Jiggly Puff&quot; would actually be a better name. 
<br>
<br>Sorry, I had to throw that in :-P
<br>
<br>SAF]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 14:18:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 14:18:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 14:18:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 2, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>SAF .</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I probably could have worded it that way</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=19020</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[DTO Dispatcher would fit just as well.  After all I am actually trying to describe a pattern to dispatch DTO's in a meaningful way.
<br>
<br>Thanks.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:16:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:16:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:16:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nic Holbrook</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

