<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Jodd: General Use Open Source Library reaches Stable 0.2</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:20:46 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Time handling</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23109</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[FYI, a full alternative to Java dates and times is being developed at <a href="http://joda-time.sourceforge.net" target="_blank">http://joda-time.sourceforge.net</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 07:47:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 07:47:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 07:47:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 5, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stephen Colebourne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>just few notes...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23109</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[let me try to explain the main purpose of jodd: it should be a handy library that may help in everyday java work. i've seen too many times that developers code the same functionality again and again and in most cases not correctly, even buggy. take for...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 06:25:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 06:25:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 06:25:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 5, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Igor Spasic</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Jodd: General Use Open Source Library reaches Stable 0.2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23109</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I like it and I use it....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:53:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 4, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Vic Cekvenich</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Not really needed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23109</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Practically everything offered by Jodd is covered quite cleanly and in a sophistocated manner by Jakarta Commons (<a href="http://jakarta.apache.org/commons" target="_blank">http://jakarta.apache.org/commons</a>) and the Spring Framework (<a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:13:53 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:13:53 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:13:53 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 4, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Les Hazlewood</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why Jodd?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23109</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Ok. No-one else responds, so I will. I really would like to like Jodd, and it definitely makes some of the right noises. There's an emphasis on simplicity and leanness. It seems test-driven. An eye for performance is always good. But upon taking a closer...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:06:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:06:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:06:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 2, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Peter den Haan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Jodd: General Use Open Source Library reaches Stable 0.2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23109</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Interesting but many features of Jodd are already covered by Jakarta Commons projects. I don't think the community needs another logging wrapper or another base 64 converter for example.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 09:20:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 09:20:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2004 09:20:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 2, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Emmanuel Bourg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Jodd: General Use Open Source Library reaches Stable 0.2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23109</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Jodd is a generic purpose open-source Java library. It helps in development of Java applications, both stand-alone and server-side. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:27:45 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:27:45 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:27:45 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 31, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dion Almaer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

