http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:19:46 -0400 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 02:37:32 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 02:37:32 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 02:37:32 -0400 Apr 20, 2005 liang yan 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 Sat, 01 May 2004 18:32:25 -0400 Sat, 01 May 2004 18:32:25 -0400 Sat, 01 May 2004 18:32:25 -0400 May 1, 2004 fcohen 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568
You don't have to lose Assert.assertNull(), etc., if you stop inheriting from a base class. You could use the new Java 1.5 feature, static imports ( Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:26:07 -0400 Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:26:07 -0400 Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:26:07 -0400 Apr 29, 2004 Moses Hohman 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 StrongTest, with the marketing line being "StrongTest is awesome."

See also: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:39:40 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:39:40 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:39:40 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 Cameron Purdy 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 I think that Junit is good (very good) for what was suppose to be - a testing framework.
I think that writing tests with annotations would be at least hard to read. I am not...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:29:01 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:29:01 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:29:01 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 beton beton 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 From junit javadoc :

A test runner either expects a static method suite as the entry point to get a test to run or it will extract the suite automatically.
public static Test suite()...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:10:11 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:10:11 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:10:11 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 jose romero 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:37:45 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:37:45 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:37:45 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 shawn spencer 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:39:49 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:39:49 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:39:49 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 nextdb 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 There's some great ideas in here, Cedric. Let me throw out some criticisms. There are a couple of things that feel rather sloppy:1) @ExpectedException attttribute. There are two problems with this. First of all, you have a...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:44:40 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:44:40 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:44:40 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 Cedric Beust 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568
1) @ExpectedException attttribute. There are two problems with this. First of all, you have a real lack of...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:31:25 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:31:25 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:31:25 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 Corby Page 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568
Cedric is not trying to complicate things; he's trying to make things simpler. If you don't think he has done that, then say why. It seems some people think he's going in an interesting...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:21:31 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:21:31 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:21:31 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 Kevin Lewis 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 IMHO, its more difficult to track down a bug caused by the first flawed test case than it is to write a test case using ThrowableAssert, which by design, makes it far harder to write bad unit tests - w.r.t exceptions, of course...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:38:44 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:38:44 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:38:44 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 Ville Oikarinen 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 This 'Next Generation' thing is only used by ms like companies. I would improve what we have.
Junit is a framework used my real programmers.
You are just trying to...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:35:03 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:35:03 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:35:03 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 beton beton 4 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568   try {
    somethingThatShouldThrow();
  } catch (MyException...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:17:14 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:17:14 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:17:14 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 James Rowe 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25568 A while back I wrote a small utility class called ThrowableAssert which provides a set of JUnit-style assert methods:  ThrowableAssert.assertThrows(ThrowableOperation op, Throwable...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:49:19 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:49:19 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:49:19 -0400 Apr 28, 2004 Ville Oikarinen 2