http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sat, 25 May 2013 13:19:33 -0400 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687 Thu, 13 May 2004 22:09:12 -0400 Thu, 13 May 2004 22:09:12 -0400 Thu, 13 May 2004 22:09:12 -0400 May 13, 2004 Vinny Carpenter 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687
But there were several instances where the review author said (paraphrasing here): "Yeah, it reminded me about that project we did. Cool".
Well, what happened on the project?
Which good experiences did the book tell you...]]> Thu, 13 May 2004 04:13:29 -0400 Thu, 13 May 2004 04:13:29 -0400 Thu, 13 May 2004 04:13:29 -0400 May 13, 2004 Stephen Hobdell 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687 was a bad review of the review, I think it was too short.Sorry, just couldn't resist :-)Regards,MattiasNo, I think if a review starts by telling me chapter a does this, then chapter b does this etc. without pointing out any...]]> Wed, 12 May 2004 05:05:01 -0400 Wed, 12 May 2004 05:05:01 -0400 Wed, 12 May 2004 05:05:01 -0400 May 12, 2004 Karl Banke 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687 Tue, 11 May 2004 20:44:09 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 20:44:09 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 20:44:09 -0400 May 11, 2004 Nathan Potter 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687 As there have been some radical changes in Weblogic between versions 6 and 8, and with version 9 on the horizon, I would think that this is very important.100% Agree. You only can try ti guess.. Based on stress on CMP QL and no...]]> Tue, 11 May 2004 14:17:33 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 14:17:33 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 14:17:33 -0400 May 11, 2004 Sergey Pomytkin 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687 A really bad review. It just outlines the chapters. Especially, I do not see where this really is any better than the online documentation that is quite good in its own right.This was a bad review of the review, I think it was...]]> Tue, 11 May 2004 10:09:47 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 10:09:47 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 10:09:47 -0400 May 11, 2004 Norla B 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687
it's nothing more than a desk ornament for...]]> Tue, 11 May 2004 09:20:19 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 09:20:19 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 09:20:19 -0400 May 11, 2004 mark lybarger 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687 Tue, 11 May 2004 06:26:44 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 06:26:44 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 06:26:44 -0400 May 11, 2004 Karl Banke 3 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687
The reviewer even admits to "glossing over" the SSL chapter: it's not of interest to him because he uses hardware SSL. Yes, but what about everyone else reading the review?

From...]]> Tue, 11 May 2004 05:55:47 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 05:55:47 -0400 Tue, 11 May 2004 05:55:47 -0400 May 11, 2004 Stephen Hobdell 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25687 Mon, 03 May 2004 16:57:51 -0400 Mon, 03 May 2004 16:57:51 -0400 Mon, 03 May 2004 16:57:51 -0400 May 3, 2004 Nitin Bharti 9