Support Forums: Message List - Featured Article: What You Can Do With EJB3 (part one) http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Thu, 23 May 2013 11:54:56 -0400 Featured Article: What You Can Do With EJB3 (part one) http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 really very useful information. thank you. dizi izle I like your site. porno izle

]]> Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:39:45 -0400 Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:39:45 -0400 Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:39:45 -0400 Oct 6, 2010 yasal turk 0 out of container http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104
Juergen, I guarantee you that it will be easy to get an out-of-container EntityManager.
Well, maybe from JBoss' specific implementation, but not covered by the EJB spec, as far as I can see. And if there was an...]]> Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:59:28 -0400 Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:59:28 -0400 Fri, 09 Jul 2004 06:59:28 -0400 Jul 9, 2004 Kalyan Kolachala 0 reusable business logic http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104
EJB is not 'central to J2EE'
Building reuseable business logic is a central concern of J2EE developers. EJB is the J2EE standard for reuseable business logic.The business logic of a system is almost by...]]> Thu, 08 Jul 2004 04:12:42 -0400 Thu, 08 Jul 2004 04:12:42 -0400 Thu, 08 Jul 2004 04:12:42 -0400 Jul 8, 2004 Paul Campbell 0 Out of container? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 Juergen, I guarantee you that it will be easy to get an out-of-container EntityManager.Gavin,

very politely and with all due respect, I would like to suggest that this is beside the point.

The EJB specification's...]]> Thu, 08 Jul 2004 03:59:31 -0400 Thu, 08 Jul 2004 03:59:31 -0400 Thu, 08 Jul 2004 03:59:31 -0400 Jul 8, 2004 Oliver Kamps 0 out of container http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 Juergen, I guarantee you that it will be easy to get an out-of-container EntityManager.Well, maybe from JBoss' specific implementation, but not covered by the EJB spec, as far as I can see. And if there was an explicit focus on...]]> Thu, 08 Jul 2004 02:59:58 -0400 Thu, 08 Jul 2004 02:59:58 -0400 Thu, 08 Jul 2004 02:59:58 -0400 Jul 8, 2004 Juergen Hoeller 1 Moving towards POJO persistence - finally! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 You can use the entity bean classes themselves outside of an EJB container, but not the EJB 3 EntityManager, i.e. not the persistence service. So you can instantiate your persistent objects any way you please, but you won't be able to persist...]]> Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:32:05 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:32:05 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:32:05 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 Vijay Ganesan 0 out of container http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:12:27 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:12:27 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:12:27 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 Gavin King 3 Moving towards POJO persistence - finally! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 If I understand right, entity beans can now be used outside of a EJB container.You can use the entity bean classes themselves outside of an EJB container, but not the EJB 3 EntityManager, i.e. not the persistence service. So you...]]> Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:46:56 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:46:56 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:46:56 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 Juergen Hoeller 5 Moving towards POJO persistence - finally! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104     private Long id;
and
    @Id(generate=AUTO)
    public Long getId()...]]> Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:33:05 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:33:05 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 16:33:05 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 tony Piselli 0 Moving towards POJO persistence - finally! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104
What a relief to see the move towards POJO persistence. I guess the EJB team finally realized that all complex things need to evolve from very simple things. Getting rid of complex deployment...]]> Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:41:36 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:41:36 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:41:36 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 Vijay Ganesan 7 Hibernate is doomed? Yeah, right... http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:39:47 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:39:47 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:39:47 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 Race Condition 0 Timing and binding http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 I'm telling my customers to adopt Spring plus a persistence alternative today. I recommend Hibernate for lightweight persistence, and Kodo for enterprise-level solutions with more advanced mapping...]]> Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:04:39 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:04:39 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:04:39 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 Ryan Breidenbach 0 Hand-waving http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 Bruce, stop making generalized statements! Stop handwaving! Come out of your book-writing corner and tell us what is so bad about Hibernate and why it is not "enterprise level". I think some techical arguments would be interesting...]]> Wed, 07 Jul 2004 06:18:02 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 06:18:02 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 06:18:02 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 Oliver Kamps 0 Timing and binding http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 05:23:35 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 05:23:35 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 05:23:35 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 pratheep p 0 Timing and binding http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27104 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 04:51:45 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 04:51:45 -0400 Wed, 07 Jul 2004 04:51:45 -0400 Jul 7, 2004 Christian Bauer 3