Support Forums: Message List - Opinion: Is J2EE Academic Crap? http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Thu, 23 May 2013 15:57:12 -0400 Relax guys .Net is hundreds times more crap than even core J2EE http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 But in J2EE architecture you are not bound to the any old crap and any platform, while Microsoft has bound...]]> Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:31:55 -0400 Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:31:55 -0400 Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:31:55 -0400 Aug 30, 2004 Mykola Paliyenko 0 Microsoft Malaria http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503  the future is here, right now, and its been here since circa 1997.
 anybody who's a serious developer understands what linux IS.
 its along the lines of promethean...]]> Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:20:50 -0400 Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:20:50 -0400 Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:20:50 -0400 Aug 12, 2004 Free Software 0 It is cool to be different: I like CMP http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 ...(should we introduce "crap" as a new hip term?)... Yes, that'd be <em>C</em>reate <em>R</em>ead <em>A</em>pply <em>P</em>urge.]]> Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:25:03 -0400 Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:25:03 -0400 Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:25:03 -0400 Aug 2, 2004 Michael Murphree 0 Nice talking http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:32:26 -0400 Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:32:26 -0400 Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:32:26 -0400 Aug 2, 2004 victor vatamanescu 0 Opinion: Is J2EE Academic Crap? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:08:19 -0400 Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:08:19 -0400 Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:08:19 -0400 Jul 27, 2004 Star Trooper 0 '.NET runs on Windows only' is not true anymore http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 Web apps are on their way out. The big guys (MS, IBM, [even] Sun, etc) are beginning to either realize or show that for, probably differing reasons, web apps are not what they are chalked up to be. User experience is typically...]]> Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:18:06 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:18:06 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:18:06 -0400 Jul 26, 2004 Michael Jouravlev 0 Community: Leaked MS Memo: The Danger of Sharing http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 Wow, so if Open Standards is a superior product at a superior cost, we should stop competition?Like, lets not use assembly line to make cars, but we should hand build it; this will make a lot more people employed and would need lots of...]]> Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:11:24 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:11:24 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:11:24 -0400 Jul 26, 2004 Michael Jouravlev 0 Not so scary http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503
Why software shouldn't?

Now cheap hardware is just a commonality, most common software will follow....]]> Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:09:30 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:09:30 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:09:30 -0400 Jul 26, 2004 Josep Blazquez 0 '.NET runs on Windows only' is not true anymore http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 I know about the Longhorn stuff, so I agree with the XAML and smart client part of your comment, as for the "more Windows platform lockin", that's your hypothesis (and you're entitled to have it, of course).By vendor...]]> Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:50:19 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:50:19 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:50:19 -0400 Jul 26, 2004 Mark N 1 Community: Leaked MS Memo: The Danger of Sharing http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503
Like, lets not use assembly line to make cars, but we should hand build it; this will make a lot more people employed and would need lots of...]]> Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:31:19 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:31:19 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 06:31:19 -0400 Jul 26, 2004 Vic Cekvenich 1 Java would not exist but for Microsoft http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 It is amazing what claims people will believe in.Java is not Sun's invention. The Zeitgeist, the time was ripe for a simplification of C++ it could just as well been any of another dozen candidates that the international web-community took up...]]> Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:19:07 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:19:07 -0400 Mon, 26 Jul 2004 05:19:07 -0400 Jul 26, 2004 Dorel Vaida 0 playing dirty http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:43:10 -0400 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:43:10 -0400 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:43:10 -0400 Jul 25, 2004 Cameron Purdy 0 playing dirty http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 They are birds of the same feather.

Regards
Rolf Tollerud]]> Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:36:28 -0400 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:36:28 -0400 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:36:28 -0400 Jul 25, 2004 Rolf Tollerud 1 Shared? Open Source? Why not it call it by its real name http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 Because dumping is illegal and donating to Open Source is a way to circumvent this obstacle... because dumping is illegal but bundling with a monopoly operating system is a way to circumvent this...]]> Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:09:08 -0400 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:09:08 -0400 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:09:08 -0400 Jul 25, 2004 Cameron Purdy 2 Shared? Open Source? Why not it call it by its real name http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27503 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:07:01 -0400 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:07:01 -0400 Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:07:01 -0400 Jul 25, 2004 Rolf Tollerud 3