<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - EJB 3, the New JavaBeans?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:11:48 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>javaBeans</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Is Javabeans better?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.storkclub.com/the-stork-club-movie-clip1.html" target="_blank">&nbsp;the stork club movie</a></p>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:36:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:36:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:36:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 17, 2013</jf:date>
        <jf:author>club stork</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>more</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p>yes,,,i'd be great if someone share their knowledge of this</p>
<p><a href="http://www.colemanworks.net/buffalo-ny-print-design/" target="_blank">buffalo brochure design</a></p>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:28:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:28:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 00:28:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 17, 2013</jf:date>
        <jf:author>colemanworks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Creating Simple EJB Application using Eclipse and JBoss</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am new to EJB
Can anybody tell me how to Create Simple EJB Application using Eclipse and JBoss Server]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:52:17 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:52:17 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:52:17 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 18, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pradeep Chabukswar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JavaBeans get/set/is naming convention</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Well, I still do not like getter/setter convention and get/set/is prefixes in silly methods, which have only goal to satisfy bean spec. Why Java does not have &#x91;property&#x92; keyword? It is so damn convenient in Object Pascal...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:05:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:05:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:05:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 5, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andres Federico Postiglioni</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java &amp;quot;package&amp;quot; v. .NET &amp;quot;internal&amp;quot; + namespace</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I hear what you're saying, but I have never actually run into this being an issue. I rarely (basically never) use package-private (aka default) access, as it seems to me to be a bit of a &quot;friend&quot; hack. All data fields are private, all accessors...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:46:08 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:46:08 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 22:46:08 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 2, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java &amp;quot;package&amp;quot; v. .NET &amp;quot;internal&amp;quot; + namespace</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm quite familiar with this one.  I really like .NET's &quot;internal&quot; modifier, too.  The root of difficulty of the problem in Java is that Java's &quot;package&quot; modifier fused the concept of &quot;namespace&quot; with that of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:06:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:06:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:06:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 2, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matthew Adams</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Javabeans: Getter/Setter comments</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If all you are doing is assigning the value of one integer to another, you can do that with an equals sign.  You don't need the overhead of creating a function, a temporary variable, and that very same assignation.</blockquote>What if later...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:57:23 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:57:23 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:57:23 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Jouravlev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>What is wrong with HttpSession?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[A http session is a type of transaction]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:01:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:01:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:01:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Aaron Evans</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Javabeans: Getter/Setter comments</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[If you have any reason at all to use a getter/setter you damn well better document why you're opening a database connection, adding 1 to the parameter, setting the value of three other variables, and sending an email.  If all you are doing is assigning...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:48:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:48:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:48:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Aaron Evans</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Is JavaBeans that convenient?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Any variable that is public should be public.  If a &quot;tool&quot; needs to know how to get and set a variable, the &quot;tool&quot; should be able to identify public variables and create it's own get and set handling.  The only reason to use bean...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:30:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:30:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:30:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Aaron Evans</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Is JavaBeans that convenient?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Does that mean you are willing to give up getters for property values that are dynamically calculated, instead of just returning the value of an instance variable?  Or property setters that have side effects?  That may be OK for you, but I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:05:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:05:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:05:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ryan Breidenbach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>But JavaBeans failed.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>... as long as you call them all 'properties' instead of just fields. The result is a set of very, very bad OO practices that have permeated standard Java development, whereby tight encapsulation is a rarity in the Java world.</blockquote>The...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:52:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:52:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:52:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hacking bear</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>What is wrong with HttpSession?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>What I am trying to say, is that SFSB are really important for pessimistic concurrency. Optimistic scheme can make do with HttpSession simply because there is no transaction. Well, the [temporary] business data [along with UI information]...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:51:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:51:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:51:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>What is wrong with HttpSession?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>(1) Where should I hold state associated with the user?<br>(2) Where should I hold state associated with UI navigation?<br>(2) Where should I hold state associated with the application transaction?<br><br>So, in current J2EE architectures, it...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:51:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:51:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:51:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Jouravlev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Is JavaBeans that convenient?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=27524</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[&quot;Property&quot; is an abstract component oriented  concept. Field alone is not a &quot;property&quot;, it is not &quot;virtual&quot; and it can not be defined in interface ( &quot;interface&quot; is a component oriented concept for contract ),...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 06:58:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 06:58:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2004 06:58:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

