<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Macromedia announces Flex Builder: IDE for Flex</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:32:14 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Flash and Shockwave Exhibit Acceptable Performance</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The latest versions of Shockwave and Flash perform quite well.  Even on a 400 MHz K6 running IE6 over a 56k MODEM, they do all right.  I have measured the comparative performances of several products mentioned above including HTML, JavaScript, Flash,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:11:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:11:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:11:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>J Dawson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I Totally Agree....</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Bruce,<br><br>At last a posting on this thread from someone who has actually taken the time to download and evaluate Flex.<br><br>Along with a colleague I was involved in the Flex Beta and the product is absolutely brilliant. Macromedia is very...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:32:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:32:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:32:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Iain Thompson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Flex, Web services</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[IBM published a good article about Flex<br><br>&quot;Develop Web services clients with Macromedia Flex&quot;<br><br><a href="http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-macroflex/"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:34:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:34:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:34:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sean Sullivan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>hmmm....</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I keep seeing threads like this.  It's flash, it's slow to render, if a windows programmers....blah blah blah.  it took me a week to get comfortable with Flex, that includes actually reading the 900 some odd page documentation.  The speed problem...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:43:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:43:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:43:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>bruce deen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Flash plus J2EE sucks? Really? Not in our production environment</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I guess we are not trying to say fancy stuff is not good, its just not good for main stream applications where it involves a lot of backend interaction and has thousands of customers hitting the site at a time. It is not...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 03:14:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 03:14:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 03:14:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>mschipperheyn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>slow slower slowest</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Thats the bottom line for most of the products like these.When rest of the world is trying to make everything download faster and better , these technologies want us to wait forever. ITs good for only a few small fancy websites. Dont even...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:57:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:57:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:57:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>mschipperheyn</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>less expensive than what?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>Frankly, for most companies, paying $12k / CPU for a working solution is a lot less expensive than most options.</blockquote>I'm curious: what solutions for rich clients/ browser deliver apps that are more expensive...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:36:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:36:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:36:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Jouravlev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>less expensive than what?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Frankly, for most companies, paying $12k / CPU for a working solution is a lot less expensive than most options.</blockquote>I'm curious: what solutions for rich clients/ browser deliver apps that are more expensive are you...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:05:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:05:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:05:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>less expensive than what?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Cameron,<br><br>Wrt your statement<blockquote>Frankly, for most companies, paying $12k / CPU for a working solution is a lot less expensive than most options.</blockquote>I'm curious: what solutions for rich clients/ browser deliver apps that are more...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:47:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:47:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:47:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>joost de vries</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Flash plus J2EE sucks? Really? Not in our production environment</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>We have rich Flash components like a tree control and a custom editing screen in a production app right now. ....<a href="http://www.roundboxmedia.com" target="_blank">http://www.roundboxmedia.com</a></blockquote>Dan, your site is unusable on...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:22:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:22:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:22:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Flash components rock? Really?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I took a look on your website. Of course, it is much easier to criticize other's work that to do your own, but I guess you wanted people to look at your site when you put the link to it in the signature, so I did.*...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:57:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:57:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:57:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Jouravlev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Flash components rock? Really?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I took a look on your website. Of course, it is much easier to criticize other's work that to do your own, but I guess you wanted people to look at your site when you put the link to it in the signature, so I did.* </blockquote>Here, allow me...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:48:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:48:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 13:48:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dan Glauser</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Flash components rock? Really?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>We have rich Flash components like a tree control and a custom editing screen in a production app right now.  They are not slow.  In fact, they rock.  The client is really happy with them and we are happy having a *real* language with an...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:31:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:31:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:31:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Jouravlev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I think you misunderstood</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>We have rich Flash components like a tree control and a custom editing screen in a production app right now.  They are not slow.  In fact, they rock.  The client is really happy with them and we are happy having a *real* language...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:47:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:47:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:47:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dan Glauser</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Flash plus J2EE sucks? Really? Not in our production environment</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28246</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>We have rich Flash components like a tree control and a custom editing screen in a production app right now.  They are not slow.  In fact, they rock.  The client is really happy with them and we are happy having a *real* language with an...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>shawn spencer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

