Support Forums: Message List - Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 Release http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sun, 19 May 2013 09:45:45 -0400 Why is this on a Java forum http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452
The primary problem is that a new C-based product is posted on a Java forum without telling people it is not Java. No doubt we are scratching our heads!]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2004 03:54:03 -0400 Mon, 06 Sep 2004 03:54:03 -0400 Mon, 06 Sep 2004 03:54:03 -0400 Sep 6, 2004 hacking bear 0 Platform portability, not version portability http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452 I think calling such stuff "portable" is just pathetic.It's quite descriptive, as in this case "portable" refers to platform portability, not version portablility. It is a library written in portable C that...]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2004 03:28:57 -0400 Mon, 06 Sep 2004 03:28:57 -0400 Mon, 06 Sep 2004 03:28:57 -0400 Sep 6, 2004 Joe Schmetzer 0 Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 Release http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452
It was built to allow the Apache HTTP Server to be...]]> Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:59:49 -0400 Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:59:49 -0400 Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:59:49 -0400 Sep 5, 2004 Brad Baker 1 Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 Release http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452 I don't think this is good enough. V2 needs to be binary compatible with V1 as does V3 and V4. If you want to break compatibility then it should be a major deal and you need to provide a lot of notice to users. If you want it to be a platform...]]> Sun, 05 Sep 2004 15:09:31 -0400 Sun, 05 Sep 2004 15:09:31 -0400 Sun, 05 Sep 2004 15:09:31 -0400 Sep 5, 2004 Neil Ellis 2 What is this? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452
Can anybody...]]> Sun, 05 Sep 2004 11:30:59 -0400 Sun, 05 Sep 2004 11:30:59 -0400 Sun, 05 Sep 2004 11:30:59 -0400 Sep 5, 2004 Finsals Collons 0 Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 Release http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452
If you want it to be a platform...]]> Sat, 04 Sep 2004 17:40:39 -0400 Sat, 04 Sep 2004 17:40:39 -0400 Sat, 04 Sep 2004 17:40:39 -0400 Sep 4, 2004 Billy Newport 3 Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 Release http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452
Note that Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 is not binary compatible with earlier APR 0.9 releases.
I think calling such stuff "portable" is just pathetic.I understand what you mean....]]> Sat, 04 Sep 2004 10:41:40 -0400 Sat, 04 Sep 2004 10:41:40 -0400 Sat, 04 Sep 2004 10:41:40 -0400 Sep 4, 2004 Robert Devi 4 Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 Release http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452
Note that Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 is not binary compatible with earlier APR 0.9 releases.
I think calling such stuff "portable" is just pathetic.Why?]]> Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:53:48 -0400 Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:53:48 -0400 Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:53:48 -0400 Sep 3, 2004 rory Winston 0 Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 Release http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452 Note that Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 is not binary compatible with earlier APR 0.9 releases.I think calling such stuff "portable" is just pathetic.]]> Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:46:26 -0400 Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:46:26 -0400 Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:46:26 -0400 Sep 3, 2004 Slava Imeshev 8 Apache Portable Runtime 1.0 Release http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28452 Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:09:21 -0400 Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:09:21 -0400 Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:09:21 -0400 Sep 2, 2004 Dilip Thomas 9