<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Components and unidirectionality in a Domain Model nonsense?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:29:18 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>once again screens ruin design</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28503</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Once again people confuse the views and pages that display data with the actual data. In pure OO the business or organization view should rule. Forget the implementation of the web pages or screens. If the domain model follows the rules of the business...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:20:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:20:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:20:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 22, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>bruce goldstein</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Components and unidirectionality in a Domain Model nonsense?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28503</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I completely agree too with the original post and Bostjan's comments.<br><br>Domain models make sense conceptually, but implementation confuses them until they no longer can possibly server their original intended purpose.  I'm taking the mindset of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 23:35:23 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 23:35:23 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 23:35:23 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 5, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Components and unidirectionality in a Domain Model nonsense?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28503</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I fully agree with your observations.<br><br>As far as components go, putting two classes into two different components when one is type of a member field in the other makes no sense at all. Anyway, EJBs are usually deployed as a set of session beans...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:55:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:55:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:55:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 5, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bostjan Dolenc</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Components and unidirectionality in a Domain Model nonsense?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28503</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[In some books there is written that you should divide your Domain Model into components.<br><br>So you would have an Article component which contains several Business Objects and another Supplier component which contains its own set of Business...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 04:30:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 04:30:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 04:30:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 5, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hans Schw?bli</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

