Support Forums: Message List - Craig McClanahan comments on Struts Future, and Struts 1.2.4 http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:19:03 -0400 Struts 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 Quite the opposite. This will call new Integer("blahh"), and if you have not configured an appropriate error page, your use will see an exception stack trace.Not true. BeanUtils uses a default set of converters...]]> Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:23:01 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:23:01 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:23:01 -0400 Sep 24, 2004 Tongyu Wang 0 Struts 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 Quite the opposite. This will call new Integer("blahh"), and if you have not configured an appropriate error page, your use will see an exception stack trace.This is not the behaviour that I see using Struts 1.1...]]> Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:18:56 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:18:56 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:18:56 -0400 Sep 24, 2004 Chris Jones 0 Stop wasting inheritance http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 With a language that does not support multiple inheritance, Struts is very intrusive : all user defined actions must extend Action and all user defined form beans must extend ActionForm.Wouldn't interfaces or reflection provide the same...]]> Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:25:43 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:25:43 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:25:43 -0400 Sep 24, 2004 Michael Jouravlev 0 Stop wasting inheritance http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894
With a language that does not support multiple inheritance, Struts is very intrusive : all user defined actions must extend Action and all user defined form beans must extend ActionForm.Wouldn't interfaces or reflection provide...]]> Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:05:57 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:05:57 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:05:57 -0400 Sep 24, 2004 Reg Whitton 0 Struts 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 ... However Struts will fail silently and move on to the next property if you try to put for example "blahh" in an int value of the DO without proper validator configuration...
Quite the opposite. This will call new...]]> Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:25:59 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:25:59 -0400 Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:25:59 -0400 Sep 24, 2004 Reg Whitton 2 Ant+XDoclet do the magic? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894
This is not true. One can use one DispatchAction and one action mapping to achieve the same. It would be a cleaner solution.
As long as Java Script is enabled on client. My code does not rely on JavaScript: We call...]]> Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:39:16 -0400 Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:39:16 -0400 Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:39:16 -0400 Sep 23, 2004 javier castanon 0 Stop wasting inheritance http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 With a language that does not support multiple inheritance, Struts is very intrusive : all user defined actions must extend Action and all user defined form beans must extend ActionForm.Wouldn't interfaces or reflection provide the same...]]> Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:52:12 -0400 Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:52:12 -0400 Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:52:12 -0400 Sep 23, 2004 J. X. 1 A few suggestions for Struts 2.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 - No more formbeans. The only case I can understand their use is when you want to repopulate data in an HTML form that didn't...]]> Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:13:38 -0400 Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:13:38 -0400 Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:13:38 -0400 Sep 23, 2004 Jean-Pol Landrain 0 more configuration integration http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 I especially hate the validation file ,why not put together with form declaration just like this:

<ActionForm name="Profile">
 <property name="name"...]]> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:44:55 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:44:55 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:44:55 -0400 Sep 22, 2004 Huang Kai 0 Re: Maintainable Struts Code http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:32:24 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:32:24 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:32:24 -0400 Sep 22, 2004 tm jee 0 Re: Maintainable Struts Code http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894
I've used it with Mozilla, IE and Opera. No problems. You might have been using a back level version. Checkout the Echo forums and the new releases of Echo and Echopoint.
Will certainly check it out. I played last...]]> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:41:29 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:41:29 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:41:29 -0400 Sep 22, 2004 Mark N 1 Put the DO on the form and use the validator plugin http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894
If you are...]]> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:06:03 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:06:03 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:06:03 -0400 Sep 22, 2004 joe nykilchyk 0 Ant+XDoclet do the magic? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894
This is not true. One can use one DispatchAction and one action mapping to achieve the same. It would be a cleaner solution.
As long as Java Script is enabled on client. My code does not rely on JavaScript: We call...]]> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:42:00 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:42:00 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:42:00 -0400 Sep 22, 2004 Michael Jouravlev 0 Re: Maintainable Struts Code http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 I've used it with Mozilla, IE and Opera. No problems. You might have been using a back level version. Checkout the Echo forums and the new releases of Echo and Echopoint.Will certainly check it out. I played last with...]]> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:20:20 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:20:20 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:20:20 -0400 Sep 22, 2004 Konstantin Ignatyev 2 Ant+XDoclet do the magic http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28894 >Here is an example of real code from it.>Action is doing many things and it is very> maintanable and convenient IMOAre you kidding ? This code is crap !How much longer will we have to endure theinventions by Craig McClanahan -...]]> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:17:41 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:17:41 -0400 Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:17:41 -0400 Sep 22, 2004 Konstantin Ignatyev 0