<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:49:35 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Its an early draft!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>My entire point was that the current EJB 3.0 spec is an early draft(one of the first!). And one that could undergo major revisions if the theserverside.com news + other community postings are any indicator.And I believe it is dangerous &amp;...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:30:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:30:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:30:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 13, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Keith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Reference Implementation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Does anyone know anything about the EJB 3.0 RI? Could JBoss be angling for this role? Not that I think that would necessarily be a bad thing, mind you. Just curious...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:26:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:26:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:26:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Daniel Gredler</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Its an early draft!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It is quite normal for a specification to undergo several revisions <br>before it ends up anywhere close to a <b><i>final draft</i></b> stage.<br><br>In fact, the EJB 3.0 <b><i>early draft</i></b> is quite radical in its (over)use(?) <br>of experimental...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:54:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:54:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:54:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Krishnan Subramanian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>sure krish</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It's about continuing to use something that's broken even though you know it's broken. At least ejb 3.0 is a step in the right direction. I for one are glad they are moving forward.<br><br>--b]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:31:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:31:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:31:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 9, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>sadfasdf asdadsf</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Its strange that when a spec is in a <b><i>early draft review</i></b> stage, a preview &quot;supporting&quot; it is already released.Customers have barely gotten from EJB 1.1 to 2.0 and 3.0 is <i>still in the making</i>. I wonder if the JBoss...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 04:06:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 04:06:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 04:06:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 9, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Mahemoff</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>... I wonder if the JBoss Group &quot;gets it&quot; that Enterprise Software is:  - not about using fairly experimental technology  - not about forcing customers to change enterprise programming models ever    so often (maybe each iteration...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 03:41:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 03:41:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 03:41:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 9, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jon Martin Solaas</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Persistance</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[So is the persistance in this version of JBOSS similiar to Hibernate ?.<br>I believe the area of persistance is still being debated in EJB3.0. Am I correct in saying so ?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 00:34:40 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 00:34:40 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 00:34:40 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 9, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rajeev Jayaram</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I like the mechanism for dependency injection. It merges the world of JNDI and IoC very nicely.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 21:02:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 21:02:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 21:02:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Lewis</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Geez, they are providing use with something to play with and provide feedback. I always want to know what is next so I don't design myself into a corner.<br><br>-Pete<br><br>PS Way to go JBoss Group!<blockquote>Its strange that when a spec is in a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:15:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:15:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:15:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pete Haidinyak</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Although I'm not a JBoss fan, I think they do &quot;get it&quot; when it comes to making this release at this time. I don't expect anyone from JBoss to tell you to deploy a mission critcal exterprise application on this release.<br><br>But this allows...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:53:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:53:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:53:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>John Murray</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>This is common and beneficial when done right</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Pre-Release implementations of in-draft specifications is fairly common, especially in and around J2EE.  WebLogic was (in)famous for doing this with early EJB and J2EE specs.<br><br>There is value in this in a couple of ways.  First off, for the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:25:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:25:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:25:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>David Wolf</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think the EJB3.0 group had to answer the charges that &quot;We won't see EJB3.0 til 2007&quot; kind of statements that have cropped up. They've always taken a very aggressive timeline. I seriously doubt anyone is expecting to use EBJ3.0 in...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:18:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:18:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:18:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I wonder if the JBoss Group &quot;gets it&quot; that Enterprise Software is:&#xA0;&#xA0;- not about using fairly experimental technology&#xA0;&#xA0;- not about forcing customers to change enterprise programming models...</blockquote>That's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:13:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:13:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:13:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul-Michael Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think the EJB3.0 group had to answer the charges that &quot;We won't see EJB3.0 til 2007&quot; kind of statements that have cropped up. They've always taken a very aggressive timeline. I seriously doubt anyone is expecting to use EBJ3.0 in production...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:46:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:46:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:46:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Lewis</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JBoss EJB 3.0 Preview Release</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29318</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Its strange that when a spec is in a <b><i>early draft review</i></b> stage, a preview &quot;supporting&quot; it is already released.<br><br>Customers have barely gotten from EJB 1.1 to 2.0 and 3.0 is <i>still in the making</i>. I wonder if the JBoss...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:35:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:35:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 12:35:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Krishnan Subramanian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>12</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

