<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:22:37 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Trails is now Tynamo</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It's been a long journey, but the next version of Trails is called Tynamo - come visit us at <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://tynamo.org!" target="_newWindow">http://tynamo.org!</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:18:24 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:18:24 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:18:24 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 13, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kalle Korhonen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So to summarize, Trails draws on the excellent work of predecessors such as Rails and Naked Objects to try be a framework for developing software in a new way.  I'm using the term Domain Driven Development to try and describe this &quot;New...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 11:29:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 11:29:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 11:29:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 4, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brian Miller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Hard things even harder? No!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The blog example is misleading because it only shows the predefined templates that are of no use in a real application. I've been using Rails since the first release. When I first saw the demo I had the same doubts, but when I started using it I was...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:21:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:21:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 15:21:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 30, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andreas Schwarz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>DD</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hello, Konstantin <br><br>I have to clarify some points I was unable to explain :<br><br>1) I do not believe any tool like Naked Objects or Trails is alone a solution for producing applications. Actually, it can help people to play / experiment their...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:02:32 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:02:32 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:02:32 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rodolfo  de Paula</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Groovy on Rails.....</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Groovy on Rails is what I was wishing for when I saw the Ruby on Rails demo.  Given the kinship of Groovy and Ruby, istseemed like a good idea.  Anyway, good luck with the project!]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:31:23 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:31:23 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:31:23 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Greg Fuller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Guilty as charged</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You got it -- I am not trying to do everything here.  My goal is to leverage existing frameworks like Spring, Tapestry and Hibernate to tap into the solutions they provide to some of these problems.  The problem I have with some of the other DDD...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:02:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:02:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:02:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Nelson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I'm not against frameworks. I'm just against frameworks that only address the easy problems, not the difficult ones. </blockquote><br>...but having said that. If people really want those kinds of frameworks, then kudos to you and good luck.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:19:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:19:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:19:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>han theman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I'm using the term Domain Driven Development to try and describe this &quot;New Way&quot;.</blockquote><br>Which is a catchy phrase and domain modelling is in the wind (and for good reason)<br><br>My point was that this &quot;new way&quot;...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:17:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:17:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:17:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>han theman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Whew,<br><br>So as the developer of Trails a little history is in order.  The goal of Trails is certainly to make the simple things simple and the hard things possible, contrary to the earlier  post.  But you all should realize what the current status of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:58:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:58:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:58:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Nelson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>But IMHO there are still many gaps to fill. The main benefits of Naked Objects or Trails (I haven&#xB4;t download it yet) is to force these unexperienced people to not lose focus on the business, the domain.</blockquote><br>That's all well...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:41:40 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:41:40 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:41:40 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Will Hartung</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So, my point is : keeping the usual job easier is good, because usually the programmers are not so experienced like TSS readers </blockquote>Fire dead wood and give some credits to people doing 'usual' job. They too need power tools, not...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:22:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:22:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:22:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>we can easily reuse and extend the application no matter how complex are the new requirements, because we have full power of object orientation, even in the web presentantion tier.</blockquote>There is a fundamental law: complexity of a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:17:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:17:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:17:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I recognize experienced architects/developers does not need any framework to keep stuff simpler.<br><br>But there are still a lot of projects with some fresh graduate guys trying hard to understand all J2EE and related frameworks mess in their first year...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:52:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:52:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:52:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rodolfo  de Paula</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Less is MORE.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Just what we need. A framework that makes simple things simple and hard things even harder.</blockquote>+1<br><br>Yes, that smells like MS ideology with all its advantages and disadvantages. I watched that blog demo and looked at Naked...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:40:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:40:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:40:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Introducing Trails: Domain Driven Framework a la Rails</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29716</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I do not see the benefits that the framework brings us. Maybe i am shortsighted. Can anybody give some comparion between this framework and the spring framework's total solution?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:38:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:38:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:38:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>eisen hower</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

