<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Interview with Gavin King on Hibernate 3</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:55:12 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>enhancements to hbm2ddl</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Holger,<br><br>I would be interested in a tool which creates the update script by comparing old and new hbm files.<br><br>How your home grown tool is creating the upgrade script?<br>Is there any tool available which generates the schema upgrade...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:48:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:48:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:48:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 27, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Umesh Sharma</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The future of annotations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This might be a bit of innocent point of view.<br>I am not sure I support the use of annotations as widly as what seens to be the common opinion.<br><br>I can see how adding annotations to describe necessary behaviour for my component is a nice...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:33:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:33:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:33:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 11, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Yann Perrin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hibernate of course supports several fully transactional concurrency control strategies (providing different levels of isolation), depending on your performance needs for particular entity data and entity association data. The physical implementation of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:35:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:35:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:35:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian  Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I also recently met the same problem. I have requirements to cache data stored and retrieved to / from some database, but the problem is when transaction is rolled back, database doesn't store object while cache still has stored it as it doesn't...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:01:49 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:01:49 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:01:49 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dmitry Zemnitskiy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Interview with Gavin King on Hibernate 3</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>EJB3 does not work with J2SE.</blockquote>Did you read the sun annoncement saying that the EJB3 ORM part will be able to be implemented outside any container?</blockquote><br>Yes, but I would not call that 'EJB'....I have been...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:07:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:07:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 09:07:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am not EJB expert, but vendors say they are very good, so I trust it.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 00:52:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 00:52:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 00:52:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 8, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>The object state still goes into the database and can be replicated in the database, but otherwise all locking and behaviours are in the objects. This all has a well known set of tradeoffs. Letting data dominate objects has too...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2004 18:25:17 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2004 18:25:17 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2004 18:25:17 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 7, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>1. not everything is data - lets say my transaction includes controlling a printer or a transient object that doesn't exist in the database. If you are using OO then a data approach makes you do some odd things to avoid using objects. Like...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:40:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:40:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:40:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 6, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian  Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The object state still goes into the database and can be replicated in the database, but otherwise all locking and behaviours are in the objects. This all has a well known set of tradeoffs. Letting data dominate objects has too high a price...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:31:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:31:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:31:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 6, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="jive-quote">we think its better to delegate such work <br>&gt;to the DB engine. Locking at the data source.<br><br>That is the royal we then?<br><br>Some problems with locking at the data source are:<br>1. not everything is data - lets say my...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:02:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:02:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 13:02:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 6, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>thoff thoff</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>&gt; We make the database do the lockingThen you are fine with a stateless model where objects are activated/passivated for each use. I don't like using a database as RAM, but that's just me.</blockquote><br>One of good ways to store this...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:48:26 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:48:26 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:48:26 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 6, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>We make the database do the locking</blockquote>Then you are fine with a stateless model where objects are activated/passivated for each use. I don't like using a database as RAM, but that's just me.</blockquote><br>Some Hibernate...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:21:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:21:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:21:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 6, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Emmanuel Bernard</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="jive-quote">We make the database do the locking<br><br>Then you are fine with a stateless model where objects are activated/passivated for each use. I don't like using a database as RAM, but that's just me.</div>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:00:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:00:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 12:00:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 6, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>thoff thoff</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="jive-quote">Please read instructions on usage before to bame this code.<br><br>I didn't really blame the code. And you sound very defensive. I would dearly love to be able to read a pile of documentation, assuming such quality doc is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:58:01 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:58:01 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:58:01 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 6, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>thoff thoff</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Second level cache ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29801</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We tolerate any kind of development, but a piece of software cannot! (at least not without either making it too generic or too errorprone)<br><br>We make the database do the locking...because that is what it is build for ;)  (+ object level locking is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:37:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:37:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 11:37:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 6, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Max Andersen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

