<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:38:30 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>One place where SQL scores is in generating reports.</blockquote><br>I agree.  Though JDO 2 has introduced aggregate and grouping support to JDOQL, so SQL isn't quite as necessary as it once was.  And many relational JDO implementations (like...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:07:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:07:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:07:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 15, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Abe White</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Abe,<br>Agree SQL is not an object query language, and OQL's have their advantages in querying objects.<br>One place where SQL scores is in generating reports. I am not talking complex reports. Trying to create even moderately complex reports using...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:03:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:03:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:03:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 15, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ravishankar V</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[BTW  &quot;complex&quot; join stuff looks like this in ODBC<br><br>SELECT * FROM {T1 LEFT OUTER JOIN T2 ON T1.C1=T2.C3}<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>( probably it is bit outdated problem )<br><br>JDBC compiliant driver must support...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:22:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:22:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 04:22:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 15, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think that some syntatical sugar and a handful of new functions is all we need in a SQL dialect for ORM.</blockquote>+1]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:43:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:43:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:43:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 15, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So you're basically saying &quot;if we add object-level concepts to SQL, then it becomes an object query language (like HQL)&quot;. That's self-evident. But my point is that SQL doesn't have those features right now.</blockquote><br>Well,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:37:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:37:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:37:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 15, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian  Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>1. JDOQL (and other object query languages) is much more concise than the equivalent SQL for complex models... sometimes 5 times as concise or more.2. JDOQL only requires knowledge of the object model, while using SQL for object queries...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:36:24 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:36:24 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:36:24 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 15, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>HQL has automatic inner joins with a dot notation, on the mapped foreign key constraint ... You use field names (well, variable identifiers of a Java type, like I said) instead of column names in HQL ... What is left is polymorphism, and this...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:06:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:06:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 22:06:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 14, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Abe White</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[HQL has automatic inner joins with a dot notation, on the mapped foreign key constraint - a very easy optimization we could make, so we did. I think SQL should have the same (optional ON clause). However, I'd like to see a real data type system first,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:52:08 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:52:08 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 21:52:08 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 14, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian  Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think SQL is a great query language &quot;for objects&quot;, and HQL proves the point (its SQL with different identifiers for types).</blockquote><br>HQL takes its structure and functions from SQL, but it works at the object level.  You can...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:45:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:45:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:45:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 14, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Abe White</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think SQL is a great query language &quot;for objects&quot;, and HQL proves the point (its SQL with different identifiers for types). It would help if you could just define &quot;object&quot; in your postings, Abe. Are you talking about variables,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:38:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:38:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:38:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 14, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Christian  Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Yes, SQL standard has a few levels and versions, any technology starts from experiments before to mature, the same is about JDO. Do not ignore and reinvent standards please, all &quot;experts&quot; like to invent alternatyve standards, but it...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:51:43 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:51:43 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:51:43 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 14, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Abe White</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>but it is as silly as to reinvent UNIX.</blockquote><br>I'll be sure to let Linus Torvalds know. <br>hehehe. Just kidding!<br><br>-geoff]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:14:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:14:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 15:14:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 14, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>nextdb</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Yes, SQL standard has a few levels and versions, any technology starts from experiments before to mature, the same is about JDO. Do not ignore and reinvent standards please, all &quot;experts&quot; like to invent alternatyve standards, but it is as silly...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:47:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:47:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:47:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 14, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>12</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It's amazing how for every JDO post, there seems to be some &quot;character&quot; intent on monopolizing the thread with talk of how JDO is not needed. </blockquote><br>I need JDO, It must be clear from my posts, but I need good JDO not...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:42:17 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:42:17 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:42:17 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 14, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO Community Process: JDO 2 Queries - Part 2</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29937</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I just don't get it.</blockquote><br>I'm porting a site off of Cold Fusion. The exercise of moving it to Wicket and JDO has been pure pleasure. Every time I look at my code I am just blown away by how few lines of code I had to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:07:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:07:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:07:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 13, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>nextdb</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

