http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:52:09 -0400 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977
Cheers,
Daniel

www.nexle.dk/daniel]]> Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:58:21 -0500 Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:58:21 -0500 Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:58:21 -0500 Mar 20, 2005 Daniel Iversen 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 to this new Solaris 10. Boot with the Solaris 10 CD, it keeps failing. Is there any hardware limit for Solaris 10?
I mean my Sun Ultra 10 with 1024 MB RAM Sparc machine can
be upgradable...]]> Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:05:44 -0500 Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:05:44 -0500 Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:05:44 -0500 Feb 15, 2005 yung choi 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:40:16 -0500 Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:40:16 -0500 Fri, 19 Nov 2004 07:40:16 -0500 Nov 19, 2004 Lyndon Samson 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:32:58 -0500 Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:32:58 -0500 Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:32:58 -0500 Nov 17, 2004 ketan padia 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:11:12 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:11:12 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:11:12 -0500 Nov 16, 2004 Rui Zhang 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 I think Solaris got the Slowaris moniker mainly due to two issues:1) It's GUI performance isn't great .. except maybe with the expensive accelerators that I've never had access to ;-)2)

Solaris got the moniker because the...]]> Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:42:55 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:42:55 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:42:55 -0500 Nov 16, 2004 Bob Baller 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/06/10/linux_uptimes_comparable_with_solaris_on_busy_sites.html]]> Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:27:45 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:27:45 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:27:45 -0500 Nov 16, 2004 Martin N. 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 1) It's GUI performance isn't great .. except maybe with the expensive accelerators that I've never had access to ;-)
I have found this to be a common failing on UNIX systems for a long time. I have used IRIX, SunOS, Solaris,...]]> Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:03:25 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:03:25 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:03:25 -0500 Nov 16, 2004 Steve Zara 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977
1) It's GUI performance isn't great .. except maybe with the expensive accelerators that I've never had access to ;-)

2) It has a propensity to bog when running anything in...]]> Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:48:45 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:48:45 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:48:45 -0500 Nov 16, 2004 Cameron Purdy 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 And besides, Linux is probably just as good in terms of robustness, features & reliability as Solaris at this point, in the 2.6 release, ...
That was my best laugh today ;-)
Seriously, Linux is _by far_ not as...]]> Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:11:30 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:11:30 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:11:30 -0500 Nov 16, 2004 Bernhard Messerer 4 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977
Anyone know the compatibility level of Solaris 10 on T-41? (I am using the Centrino wireless chipset)

Kind Regards,

Ted Slusser]]> Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:43:21 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:43:21 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:43:21 -0500 Nov 16, 2004 Ted Slusser 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 Linux and Solaris executables use them same format ELF. Major difference between them are system calls. In this case if you will write interceptor for Linux syscalls and forwad them to appropriate solaris call or calls you can run linux...]]> Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:41:41 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:41:41 -0500 Tue, 16 Nov 2004 05:41:41 -0500 Nov 16, 2004 Nebojsa Vasiljevic 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 95% of current tools for linux use libc + posix and can be compliled...]]> Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:08:34 -0500 Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:08:34 -0500 Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:08:34 -0500 Nov 15, 2004 Giedrius Trumpickas 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 Major difference between them are system calls. In this case if you will write interceptor for Linux syscalls and forwad them to appropriate solaris call or calls you can run linux executable on...]]> Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:06:03 -0500 Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:06:03 -0500 Mon, 15 Nov 2004 23:06:03 -0500 Nov 15, 2004 Giedrius Trumpickas 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29977 Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:59:33 -0500 Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:59:33 -0500 Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:59:33 -0500 Nov 15, 2004 Philippe Grenet 1