<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - AOP Considered Dangerous</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:36:44 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>&amp;quot;major critic&amp;quot; -&amp;gt; &amp;quot;minor critic&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Heheh, your comments remind me of Tucker Carlson's comments to Jon Stewart on CNN's crossfire where Tucker criticizes Stewart for his reporting style.</blockquote><br>Um.. didn't Stewart call him a DICK after that?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:00:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:00:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:00:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 27, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sal Distefano</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AOP and multiple vendors</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi all<br><br>We are trying to determine weather AOP is a good fit for us or is it too dangerous.  <br>I have being reading a number of discussion threads and I must say that I do agree that caution is needed.  Conceptually (I would even say even...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:12:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:12:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:12:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 24, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michail Medvinsky</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AOP security !!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I don't really see where this would be different from someone modifying your (non-AOP) code base and inserting the malicious code there.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:15:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:15:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:15:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 18, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>traceroute</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AOP security !!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[i got a question here...what restrictions are available that someone doesnot inject malicious code.<br><br>am not talkin about application level security or cross cutting concerns , but at the byte code level the way AOP really works.Cant someone cause...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:44:26 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:44:26 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:44:26 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bala   _| /\\ \\/ /\\</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AOP vs OOP</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I just wrote a <a href="http://www.trajano.net/16104.html" target="_blank">blog entry</a> on <a href="http://www.trajano.net" target="_blank">my website</a> regarding AOP vs OOP.  The jist of it is AOP just needs the two things that I think really helped...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:24:02 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:24:02 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:24:02 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 30, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Archimedes Trajano</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AOP is anti OOP!!!!!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Its obvious.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:52:43 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:52:43 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:52:43 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tsolak Petrosian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>back to minor, back! back!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>My final <a href="http://hookom.blogspot.com/2004/11/ego-tripping-at-gates-of-hell.html" target="_blank">word</a> on AOP.</blockquote><br>Oh what the heck, I'll post one more too.<br><blockquote>This along with the SQL/C++ comparison are...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:21:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:21:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:21:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gregor Kiczales</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynch Aspect</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[My final <a href="http://hookom.blogspot.com/2004/11/ego-tripping-at-gates-of-hell.html" target="_blank">word</a> on AOP.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:00:35 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:00:35 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:00:35 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynch Aspect</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Not sure why it makes a difference.  Refactoring will be able to rewrite correctly either of these syntaxes.Also, I'm not sure I like the idea that a method can declare itself &quot;asynchronous&quot;.This is the kind of decision only a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:46:08 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:46:08 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:46:08 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 27, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>chussenet</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynch Aspect</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Even though the method call is asynchronous, all operations on the object must be synchronous since it binds the result of the last call to a ThreadLocal variable of the mixin (please politely catch me on this if I'm wrong ;-)....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:25:10 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:25:10 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:25:10 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 27, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>chussenet</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Here's a silly thought</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[how about a debugging aspect? that way, one could shutdown the server, turn on debugging aspect and restart. The server would inject all the normal aspects and debugging. of course, that's not to say it will be easy to find and fix the bug.<br><br>why...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:25:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:25:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:25:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Testing</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Anyone who's had to maintain large applications, debugging often starts with a stack trace in a log.  If your classes are being weaved with aspects at compile time, it sounds like the weaving process would make it more difficult to track the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:11:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:11:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:11:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tomasz Nazar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Does AOP solve these problems?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The application code and scripting code are not aware with each other becoz they are not dependent with each other during compile time.</blockquote>This along with the SQL/C++ comparison are great analogies for the differences between AOP and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 08:15:44 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 08:15:44 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2004 08:15:44 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Does AOP solve these problems?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The application code and scripting code are not aware with each other becoz they are not dependent with each other during compile time.<br><br>But, is AOP solve these problem? <br><br>I try some AOP code and i found that they uses the reflection heavily...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:07:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:07:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 23:07:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Code Manner</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Not mutually exclusive</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30154</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[That is interesting - AOP (more familiar with AspectJ), seems to me like OO + aspects. I don't see AOP as a system that uses only aspects but as a system where I add aspects to an OO implementation. That is, with the first aspect I add, I obtain an AO...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:25:21 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:25:21 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2004 15:25:21 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marius M</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

