Support Forums: Message List - AspectWerkz team releases AWbench: AOP benchmark tool http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:29:58 -0400 time to consider carefully http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238 The simplicity and transparency of proxies is hard to beat.
Proxy based approach is a fine one which is why the next version of JBoss AOP will have a proxy framework in place. Its mostly implemented and our current EJB3...]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:56:28 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:56:28 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:56:28 -0500 Dec 1, 2004 Bill Burke 0 time to consider carefully http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238 or an approach wrapping arguments in object arrays every time when an advice gets executed vs a more rich approach with straitght access to the arguments (thru direct reference
I have yet to write an aspect (probably same with...]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:53:18 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:53:18 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:53:18 -0500 Dec 1, 2004 Bill Burke 0 time to consider carefully http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238 Peter. Have you ever used AspectWerkz? It does not extend the Java syntax [...]I have - I was thinking of AspectJ there. AspectWerkz does not have anywhere near that impact. It's still Wed, 01 Dec 2004 07:29:25 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 07:29:25 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 07:29:25 -0500 Dec 1, 2004 Peter den Haan 1 time to consider carefully http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:29:26 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:29:26 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:29:26 -0500 Dec 1, 2004 Alex Vasseur 1 time to consider carefully http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238
Have you ever used AspectWerkz?
It does not extend the Java syntax, it is annotation and or xml defined plain Java.
It is not in any way more complex and harder to integrate into J2EE environments than Spring AOP. It takes perhaps...]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:03:26 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:03:26 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:03:26 -0500 Dec 1, 2004 Jonas Bon?r 4 time to consider carefully http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238 But we do need to be careful about the performance arguments we make. Down the road, you aren't going to want to be using an AOP framework that doesn't have efficiency comparable (or better than) the best that AspectJ...]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2004 04:43:20 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 04:43:20 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 04:43:20 -0500 Dec 1, 2004 Peter den Haan 0 time to consider carefully http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238 That's a purely academic and frankly irrelevant argument. In the real world [blah blah blah]I just realised that this looks like an attempt to dismiss you as "an academic". My apologies. I do not. I just feel that the...]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2004 04:17:06 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 04:17:06 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 04:17:06 -0500 Dec 1, 2004 Peter den Haan 0 time to consider carefully http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238
They better be [faster], because both (especially AspectJ) address a totally different use case.
AspectJ and AspectWerkz are intended for the full range from micro-fine to coarse-grained. So its not so much a different...]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2004 03:59:36 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 03:59:36 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2004 03:59:36 -0500 Dec 1, 2004 Peter den Haan 6 time to consider carefully http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238
[...] i was also looking into using [Spring] for its AOP capabilities. but now after reviewing these benchmarks as listed on the site.....i may have to reconsider.
No it didn't. Of the list, only AspectJ and...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:51:45 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:51:45 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:51:45 -0500 Nov 30, 2004 Gregor Kiczales 8 time to reconsider http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238 well after being more than pleased with Spring's ease of use/integration with Hibernate in the financial web application i am currently working on, i was also looking into using it for its AOP capabilities. but now after reviewing these...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:43:28 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:43:28 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:43:28 -0500 Nov 30, 2004 Cameron Purdy 0 time to reconsider http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238
I think it is a great idea to continue this test suite and I am certainly happy to get involved on the Spring side of things. As I am sure you are aware there is a lot of tweaking that can be done to the Spring configuration to improve the...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:21:17 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:21:17 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:21:17 -0500 Nov 30, 2004 Rob Harrop 0 time to reconsider http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238
We have simply observed that since more than 6 months, for every AOP talk and every AOP related announcement (be it AspectWerkz or...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:38:45 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:38:45 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:38:45 -0500 Nov 30, 2004 Alex Vasseur 1 time not to reconsider http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238 [...] i was also looking into using [Spring] for its AOP capabilities. but now after reviewing these benchmarks as listed on the site.....i may have to reconsider. if i am reading it correctly Spring performed HORRIBLY compared to the rest of...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:20:46 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:20:46 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:20:46 -0500 Nov 30, 2004 Peter den Haan 9 time to reconsider http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 03:21:36 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 03:21:36 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 03:21:36 -0500 Nov 30, 2004 Juergen Hoeller 2 time to reconsider http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=30238
It simply shows the execution time of different aspects, taking...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:53:11 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:53:11 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:53:11 -0500 Nov 30, 2004 Jonas Bon?r 0