<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - I am appalled</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:35:10 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Don't be so appalled</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31597</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Your first gripe is actually a legitimate design pattern for EJBs.  To facilitate unit testing of your business logic outside the EJB container, many folks DO put their business domain logic into POJOs and wrap them with EJBs for the value-add services...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:07:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:07:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:07:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 4, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Carman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I am appalled</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31597</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I usually have a delegate on the client which mirrors the EJB but catches RemoteException (checked) and rethrows as Runtime so the clients don't need to bother about it.<br><br>What would be a better way of getting rid of the RemoteException which no one...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 13:31:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 13:31:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 13:31:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Colin Yates</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I am appalled</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31597</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Catching checked exceptions and then... throwing them away. If you're really lucky, the code will replace them with a meaningless new MyCrappyApplicationException(&quot;general error&quot;) type of thing.</blockquote><br>If you're really...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:15:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:15:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:15:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Mahemoff</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I am appalled</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31597</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am appalled at the general quality of J2EE applications I have seen over the past few years as a consultant on various sites. Time and time again I have seen 'J2EE design patterns' utterly misunderstood and confused.<br><br>What proportion of J2EE...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:16:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:16:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:16:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>adrian osullivan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

