<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - JSR 270: J2SE 6.0 (&amp;quot;Mustang&amp;quot;) Release Contents</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:49:28 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>GC, Isolates</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The time to collect garbage is at least O(x^2) where x is the number of objects inside the JVM.</blockquote><br>Generational scavenging ensures that reclamation doesn't involve the entire heap.  <br><blockquote>I would always use different...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:16:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:16:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:16:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brian Miller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Isolates</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[They have a long way to go  before they can do that. The time to collect garbage is at least O(x^2) where x is the number of objects inside the JVM. Today you get garbage collection down times of a second or more even with the low pause garbage...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:35:01 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:35:01 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:35:01 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Haug B?rger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JSR 270: J2SE 6.0 (&amp;quot;Mustang&amp;quot;) Release Contents</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Wish they would do something about:<br>-Poor font rendering quality in Swing - no smoothing from OS settings.<br>-The snail's pace of work being done on the Win L&amp;F (that's the perception based on Tiger).<br>etc. etc.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:28:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:28:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:28:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joe M.</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>User Interface - JDNC</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Don't quote me on this, but I believe most of the Swing stuff is going to come through the JDNC project on java.net. In addition to the main aim of JDNC (to cut much of the tedium from creating front-ends to typical enterprise apps), it also has enhanced...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:16:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:16:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:16:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Hawtin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Isolates</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Sun should avoid a version 6 release until they get Isolates in there.  To me, and many others, this would warrant a new version release.<br><br>Looking at my desktop while I write this I have 3 java applications and 1 java application server running....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:32:18 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:32:18 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:32:18 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stan Brown</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Isolates</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Read here lot of time ago<br><a href="http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=25010" target="_blank">http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=25010</a><br>is stil in the specs ?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:40:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:40:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:40:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Luca Masini</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JSR 270: J2SE 6.0 (&amp;quot;Mustang&amp;quot;) Release Contents</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I hope the guys from Sun actually read all these posts in serverside.com and take some feedback. :-)<br><br>Despite years of yearning from the community, sun seems to do nothing BIG in the Enterprise Desktop area.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:32:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:32:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:32:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dushyanth Inguva</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Isolates</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Where did you read about new execution model? Last time I checked, Sun dropped the ball on support for Isolate API in Mustang, and spec lead Pete Soper said that it wont be in there and that simple 1:1 (new VM for each isolate) implementation may happen...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 05:50:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 05:50:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 05:50:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>pero peric</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>What about the new execution model ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I read about the new execution model of jdk1.6, that allows applicaton to run inside a single JVM but isolated one from the other. This is really an important feature if enterprise Java wants to reach server consolidation (I have in mind many Tomcat,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 03:36:49 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 03:36:49 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 03:36:49 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Luca Masini</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>User Interface</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[While 'enterprise desktop' is one of the announced themes of Mustang, when you come to enumerating jsrs there are none about it.<br>&nbsp;<br>I think that also the java desktop user interface (swing) should run under community reviews (jsrs) for...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 02:50:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 02:50:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 02:50:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Carlo Marchiori</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Version 6??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[+1<br><br>These changes do not justify new version number.<br>I think it is a marketing move.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:32:50 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:32:50 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:32:50 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Vagif Verdi</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Version 6??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Why go up a whole version, looks more like a point release to me.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:56:05 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:56:05 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:56:05 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matt Giacomini</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JSR 270: J2SE 6.0 (&amp;quot;Mustang&amp;quot;) Release Contents</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[They're generally pretty inoffensive, as you say. Still, nothing *really* exciting there, but a lot of stuff that's been discussed at length already.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:12:57 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:12:57 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:12:57 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>rory Winston</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JSR 270: J2SE 6.0 (&amp;quot;Mustang&amp;quot;) Release Contents</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Permalink to my post should of been <a href="http://www.magpiebrain.com/archives/2005/02/16/mustang" target="_blank">http://www.magpiebrain.com/archives/2005/02/16/mustang</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:52:35 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:52:35 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:52:35 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>sam newman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JSR 270: J2SE 6.0 (&amp;quot;Mustang&amp;quot;) Release Contents</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31880</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I had a look at each JSR being talked about here: <a href="http://www.magpiebrain.com/" target="_blank">http://www.magpiebrain.com/</a>, and it seemed to lack the focus of Java 5, and be an effort to match features already in .NET - there seems to be a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:52:01 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:52:01 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:52:01 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>sam newman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

