<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Pro Spring: Spring and EJB</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:04:04 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Question</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi All,<br>Let me explain what we are planning to do.<br>We are developing a J2EE application with following requirement.<br><br>1. Workflow based .. so that developer can easily define its workflow in plain xml<br>2.Schedular.. Lots background jobs are...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:20:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:20:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:20:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 26, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ani chou</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>wich solution do you recommend?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi I found the Pro Spring: Spring and EJB article great. I have implemented it and worked fine. I have one question.  I have three session EJB in my application, each one providing different services. Should I use only one ApplicationContext.xml or...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:28:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:28:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:28:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 27, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nicol??s Fonnegra</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>it is not correct for statefull ejb</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>...once the EJB is reactivated the CounterService will be created again from scratch...</blockquote><br>in your article, to avoid that, you chose to keep the handle to the stateful session bean in the HttpSession, instead use a different...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:35:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:35:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:35:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>michael kuzo</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Let's add Hessian to the list... it's such a nice lightweight alternative to Web Services for remoting.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:44:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:44:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 17:44:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 2, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robert Hayes</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>ebj not bound - Naming Exception</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I have tried to implement the example you provided in the article using JBoss. I have two apllicationContext.xml files one in the ejb.jar and the other under WEB-INF, as explained in the article. But as JBoss starts up it seems that it reads the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 11:59:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 11:59:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 11:59:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 5, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Vijay Phagura</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>accessing ejb with spring, but ejb being built without spring</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Rob and Jan:<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;Thank your aritcle. I built and deploy example mentioned in your article with jboss.  I have a question that is whether I can implement ejb without spring ( no ApplicationContext.xml for ejb implementation), but my client a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:11:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:11:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:11:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>dfaf dfasfd</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Question...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[|<br>|If you only use framework style development, how can you <br>|judge code generators?<br>|<br><br>Do you think I flipped a coin to come to that conclusion? It comes from experience.<br><br>Code generation <i>can</i> be suitable - so long as its very...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:16:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:16:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:16:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nick Minutello</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB 3</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[|<br>|Rod Johnson started the &quot;without EJB&quot; argument. It is only <br>|natural for the EJB3 fans to come back with a &quot;without <br>|Spring&quot; argument.<br>|<br><br>Ha ha. I hadnt appreciated the irony of that comment. :-)<br><br>Though, I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:46:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:46:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:46:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nick Minutello</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Question...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[|<br>|Have you pointed out JDO's &quot;own problems&quot; in any JDO <br>|related threads?<br>|<br><br>Yes. A long time ago.<br>The fact remains that no major java vendor - including the major ORM vendors - supports it.<br><br>-Nick]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:20:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:20:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:20:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nick Minutello</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Question...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Therefore the answer is still: in EJB container using Spring is non-sense and bring you more disadvantages. </blockquote><br>I totally agree with you!<br><br>But,<br>J2EE server != EJB container<br>EJB container != J2EE server<br><br>The...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:30:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:30:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:30:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 23, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB 3</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>JDO has its own problems </blockquote>Have you pointed out JDO's &quot;own problems&quot; in any JDO related threads?<blockquote>- very little to do with EJB3...</blockquote>Then why the EJB3 side don't want JDO2 to be...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:17:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:17:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:17:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 23, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Question...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[More about dependencies:<br><br>1. Code Generators: tool level dependency. The results (generated codes) are independent.<br>2. External Frameworks: build-time or compile-time, runtime dependency and also sometimes they have tool level...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:55:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:55:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:55:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 23, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Lofi Dewanto</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Question...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[&lt;quote&gt;<br>Thats like saying Java is not useful in and EJB container.<br>Certain services that spring provides (e.g. transaction interception) is provided by the appserver. But I am not sure how you can say the same for the Hibernate support, JDBC...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:48:50 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:48:50 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:48:50 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 23, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Lofi Dewanto</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB 3</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>And in the quest for simplicity, for some Appserver applications, EJB3 will be enough - and they wont need spring or anything else. We should welcome that.-Nick</blockquote><br>Rod Johnson started the &quot;without EJB&quot; argument. It is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:51:05 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:51:05 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:51:05 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB 3</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=31914</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>JDO has its own problems </blockquote><br>Have you pointed out JDO's &quot;own problems&quot; in any JDO related threads?<br><blockquote>- very little to do with EJB3...</blockquote><br>Then why the EJB3 side don't want JDO2 to be...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:33:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:33:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:33:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

