<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Former Apache JCP EC Representative Says JCP Is Too Closed</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:42:49 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>JDO decision</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>What I find *really* disturbing about the whole JDO/EJB3 debate is that the TSS Cause of the Month Club and the Bitter Bloggers are so quick to try and tear down the JCP.  Proved to me how short thinking people can be...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:44:17 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:44:17 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:44:17 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO decision</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>What I find *really* disturbing about the whole JDO/EJB3 debate is that the TSS Cause of the Month Club and the Bitter Bloggers are so quick to try and tear down the JCP.  Proved to me how short thinking people can be...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:25:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:25:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:25:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO decision</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Sorry Bill for my &quot;persistence&quot; ;), but you are not making sense:<blockquote>It takes an extreme amount of energy, time, and money to implement, support, sit on committees, market and sell your implementation of a specification.  At the time me...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:22:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:22:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:22:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO decision</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Bill,it is rather difficult to understand how there could be such relevant technical arguments against JDO as much as to demand creating a entirely new persistence spec, and then have JDO vendors provide BOTH JDO and EJB3 persistence APIs...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:36:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:36:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:36:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO decision</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If there were really big technical discrepancies between both APIs, I don't think this would be achievable in the first place!</blockquote><br>Well, the same could be said about CMP.  We were going to build our CMP solution on top of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:12:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:12:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:12:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO decision</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Bill,<br><br>it is rather difficult to understand how there could be such relevant technical arguments against JDO as much as to demand creating a entirely new persistence spec, and then have JDO vendors provide BOTH JDO and EJB3 persistence APIs with...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:20:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:20:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 12:20:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Former Apache JCP EC Representative Says JCP Is Too Closed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Tough luck for the smaller ISVs (like CodeFutures) that invested time and effort in JDO support.</blockquote>I felt that way until last night when I read Mr. Burke's &quot;standalone persistance&quot; post in another thread here....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:44:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:44:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:44:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDO decision</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Do any of you remember <a href="http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=20171" target="_blank">JBoss JDO</a>?<br><br>What happened to that?  What happened to that 2 year old announcement?  The story is that at the time, we were heavily...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:37:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:37:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 11:37:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Former Apache JCP EC Representative Says JCP Is Too Closed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The only reason I can think of is this, for Hibernate/Toplink to &quot;standardise&quot; their API (under EJB3 persistence) at the expense of other vendors and the community.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:52:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:52:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:52:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Former Apache JCP EC Representative Says JCP Is Too Closed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>As far as I'm concerned EJB-3 persistance <b>is</b> JDO rebranded.  The new marketing really confused me at first, since there's nothing enterprise (ie, J2EE) about EJB-3 persistance. </blockquote><br>Why JDO needs to be rebranded as EJB3...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:45:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:45:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:45:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Former Apache JCP EC Representative Says JCP Is Too Closed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Tough luck for the smaller ISVs (like CodeFutures) that invested time and effort in JDO support.</blockquote><br>I felt that way until last night when I read Mr. Burke's &quot;standalone persistance&quot; post in another thread here.  Then I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:58:50 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:58:50 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:58:50 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brian Miller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Former Apache JCP EC Representative Says JCP Is Too Closed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It looks like JDOM 1.0 (JSR-102) is still in the Expert Group Formation stage although, given the date of the original JSR, this presumably now means that the effort has been abandonned (please correct me if I'm wrong). <br><br>The comments against this...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:48:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:48:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:48:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robin Roos</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Former Apache JCP EC Representative Says JCP Is Too Closed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>So how might the JCP Executive vote when EJB 3.0 comes up for its first ballot?</blockquote>Hmm... now what are you suggesting?</blockquote><br>The only formal mechanism for EC members to influence JSRs is through their vote and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:43:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:43:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:43:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robin Roos</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Former Apache JCP EC Representative Says JCP Is Too Closed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Potentially related?<br><br><a href="http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=102" target="_blank">http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=102</a><br><br>Peace,<br><br>Cameron Purdy<br><a href="http://www.tangosol.com/" target="_blank">Tangosol, Inc.</a><br><a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:03:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:03:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:03:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I'm all for open source but...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well, one reason for not standardizing over an existing product would be that this particular product would have a huge headstart over any competitor, and chance becoming a &quot;monopoly&quot;.Regards,Henrique Steckelberg</blockquote><br>Oh,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:01:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:01:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:01:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tero Vaananen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

