<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Does EJB 3.0 really make application development easy?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 06:40:59 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>slow progress on jsr 237 ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I see, WebSphere and not WebLogic. Anyway, looking forward to the relese of this JSR; definitely a huge need.<br><br>Simon]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:00:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:00:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:00:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Simon Gunzenreiner</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Our EJB3 Persistence layer is built on the top of Oracle TopLink and hence inherits all it's robustness.</blockquote><br>This is certainly true and an indicator that Oracle's EJB3 persistence *backend* will be robust. It doesn't say anything...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:26:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:26:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:26:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juergen Hoeller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>hardly anyone upgrades the entire J2EE server in an instant; that approvement process can take ages. An in particular, noone will upgrade their entire production J2EE server to a pre-release version.</blockquote><br>And even when the server...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:49:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:49:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:49:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Davide Baroncelli</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>slow progress on jsr 237 ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The JSR is moving along. In the meanwhile, both WebLogic and WebSphere implemented a subset of the Async beans APIs that are portable across both products. Some enterprising soul could implement this on JBoss/Geronimo pretty easily also. I've also...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:16:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:16:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:16:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Billy Newport</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>slow progress on jsr 237 ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Too bad that the Work Manager JSR doesn't seem to make any progress. It's not even in the proposed list of JSRs to be considered for J2EE 5.0! Do you know any details considering bea is in the expert group?<br><br>Simon]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:00:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:00:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:00:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Simon Gunzenreiner</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Rod,<br>We will make sure that you will have not have the similar experience with Oracle's EJB3 implementation when we go to production (:-<br><br>Our EJB3 Persistence layer is built on the top of Oracle TopLink and hence inherits all it's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:46:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:46:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:46:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Debu Panda</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The document proves that WLS 6.0 included features of EJB 2.x before it was finalized.</blockquote>I remember very well. I actually tried to use that new CMP implementation at the time. Not a happy experience, as it was quite immature, unlike...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:37:08 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:37:08 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:37:08 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rod Johnson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Gavin,This is not about certification per se, it's about production-readiness of the overall J2EE environment. J2EE servers like WebLogic and WebSphere usually don't declare a version production-ready until it's fully certified for a specific...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:19:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:19:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:19:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Debu Panda</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>further simplifying using the EJB 3 model</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It is blatant and yes, I am shameless :) But after Bill plugged the other stuff, I couldn't resist.But, I do think our stuff is really cool plus I have quite a bit of sweat in it so what can I say.I can't comment on when we'll have EJB 3.0 in...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:51:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:51:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:51:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Debu Panda</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hmmmm .... one month ago, Hibernate changed in a way that broke user code.</blockquote>True. No doubt you had valid reasons for making that choice. But the migration exercise wasn't too hard, as the same mappings should work and the API is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:23:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:23:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:23:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rod Johnson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Gavin,<br><br>This is not about certification per se, it's about production-readiness of the overall J2EE environment. J2EE servers like WebLogic and WebSphere usually don't declare a version production-ready until it's fully certified for a specific...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:21:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:21:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:21:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juergen Hoeller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Spring and Hibernate are mature products with large user bases</blockquote><br>Since EJB 3.0 implementations can be very simple wrappers around mature ORM products like Hibernate/TopLink/Kodo, and mature EJB 2.1 containers, all with even...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:56:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:56:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:56:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gavin King</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>And as a corollary to that, since Sping/Hibernate can never, ever be certified as compliant with any standard anywhere, nobody anywhere can never ever use Spring/Hibernate in production.</blockquote>Spring and Hibernate are mature products...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:06:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:06:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:06:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rod Johnson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>After all, certified EJB3 containers are still a while away... a lot of early PR doesn't change that fact. Previews are nice, but noone is gonna get certified before the official release of the J2EE 1.5 umbrella spec - which won't happen...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:25:32 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:25:32 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:25:32 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gavin King</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>So, nobody says &amp;quot;EJB 3.0 sucks&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33082</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>When i saw this thread, i firstly thought that people would say lots of negative opinions. I'm just a j2ee newbie and worked only on a hibernate based project. I really want to know if EJB has a future?</blockquote>Get...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:10:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:10:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 23:10:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 5, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

