<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - JSF 1.2 and JSP 2.1 Public Review Specifications Now Available</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 06:44:07 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>TOMCAT?!!!!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>every new spec for jsp require new tomcat release, so r the developers begining the 6.x series or what?what is the relation between the tomcat team and myfaces ? i think it is time for collaboration</blockquote>yes,i hava the same...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:22:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:22:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:22:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Postback as ASPX..??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Will be posible with FACES process data on server and return results without reloading page..??CesaribSoft Development</blockquote><br>It's up to the creator of the the JSF component.  JSFCentral.com has a big list of components available for...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:20:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:20:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:20:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Postback as ASPX..??</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Will be posible with FACES process data on server and return results without reloading page..??<br><br>Cesar<br>ibSoft Development]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:59:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:59:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:59:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cesar Rodriguez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>TOMCAT?!!!!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>every new spec for jsp require new tomcat release, so r the developers begining the 6.x series or what?what is the relation between the tomcat team and myfaces ? i think it is time for collaboration</blockquote><br>yes,i hava the same...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:01:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:01:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:01:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 25, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>zhao shifeng</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think it supports idea that JSF is driven by vendor's desire to build something to be able to sell it.</blockquote>&lt;sarcasm&gt;<br>Ok, let's dump this whole standardization effort because we found in someone's blog one little phrase...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:14:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:14:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:14:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Just to show where one JSF implementation (Shale) is heading:<a href="http://www.jroller.com/page/dgeary/20050321" target="_blank">http://www.jroller.com/page/dgeary/20050321</a>This is not a guarantee that JSF will ever dominate web...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:34:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:34:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:34:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Just to show where one JSF implementation (Shale) is heading:<br><a href="http://www.jroller.com/page/dgeary/20050321" target="_blank">http://www.jroller.com/page/dgeary/20050321</a><br><br>This is not a guarantee that JSF will ever dominate web...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:39:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:39:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:39:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>would be dumb to not have such a goal, </blockquote>Really? Then why there are so many projects doing the same thing and they do not cooperate?</blockquote>Why not? Can't each of them seek this goal separately? Or should there be...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:13:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:13:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:13:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>No sarcasm: If a framework does not have a goal of substantially improving and surpassing an established FW then yes, it should be abandoned. See: I am all for standardization too :)</blockquote>It would be dumb to not have such a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:30:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:30:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:30:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>No sarcasm: If a framework does not have a goal of substantially improving and surpassing an established FW then yes, it should be abandoned. See: I am all for standardization too :)</blockquote>It would be dumb to not have such a goal, and I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:00:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:00:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:00:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>&lt;sarcasm&gt; Yes, let's stop immediately each and every web framework development right now, because there is no way they will ever reach Tapestry, even less surpass it.&lt;/sarcasm&gt;Not mentioning that JSF is an stardardization effort,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:44:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:44:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:44:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I think one of the big obstacles to JSF development is debug information. It is very difficult to understand why some jsf exceptions have occurred.</blockquote>Tapestry provides sophisticated built-in exception reporting and line...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:48:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:48:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:48:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I think one of the big obstacles to JSF development is debug information. It is very difficult to understand why some jsf exceptions have occurred.</blockquote>Tapestry provides sophisticated built-in exception reporting and line...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:31:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:31:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:31:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think one of the big obstacles to JSF development is debug information. It is very difficult to understand why some jsf exceptions have occurred. Many of the exception messages don't help the developer and some of them leads to wrong...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:22:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:22:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:22:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hookomjj</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Improvement in debugging?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33326</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think one of the big obstacles to JSF development is debug information. It is very difficult to understand why some jsf exceptions have occurred.</blockquote>Tapestry provides sophisticated built-in exception reporting and line precise...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:20:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:20:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:20:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

