<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Sun claims best-in-class price/performance score for Sun AS8.1</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:23:07 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sun claims best-in-class price/performance...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>With Hibernate/Spring I now have an application 100% deployable to any AppServer without care about DDs.IMHO.</blockquote><br>You are right. But reason for that is that you do not change your app server at all. You deploy your app server...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 03:39:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 03:39:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 03:39:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 23, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>32-bit vs 64-bit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Correct. A 64-bit JVM could be up to ~20% slower due to the increased load on memory caches etc caused by the larger size of pointers and other things. On Intel EM64T or AMD64 hardware part of this performance loss is regained through the slightly larger...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:22:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:22:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:22:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrik Stahl</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sun claims best-in-class price/performance...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Damian, <br><br>I will not start another discussion about use or not use EJBs, but for my real projects I have decided migrate from EJB    to Spring/Hibernate for one simple feature : My application need to be deployable to many diferent AppServers,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:54:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:54:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:54:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rogerio Saulo</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sun claims best-in-class price/performance...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[the biggest disadvantage of EJB21 is that it does not support a rich OO domain model<br><br>for me it is not a big issue, because I prefer to maintain a very good relationship with my Oracle DBA anyway ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:27:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:27:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:27:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sun claims best-in-class price/performance...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>When J2EE is criticized, Entity Beans comes first on the list, then EJBs in general. Part of the criticism is the overall development model (classes, interfaces, descriptors)</blockquote><br>this is true; but if you use right IDE (e.g. SUN...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:22:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:22:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 04:22:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Sun claims best-in-class price/performance score for Sun AS8.1</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Nice to see some numbers.  I'm sick to death of armchair opinions.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 03:25:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 03:25:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 03:25:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joe M.</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Other kinds of performance</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>On a completely unrelated subject, does anyone know why they used a 32-bit VM on a bunch of 64-bit CPUs?</blockquote><br>I bet that a 64 Bit JVM is slower than 32 Bit. I mean, all of a sudden, every object pointer is twice is big, so you...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:38:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:38:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:38:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Will Hartung</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sun claims best-in-class price/performance...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>SUN's entity beans are powered by SUN's JDO. Do you consider SUN's JDO also as horrors? Also Entity beans stay in EJB3. Is it also horror?</blockquote><br>When J2EE is criticized, Entity Beans comes first on the list, then EJBs in general....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:32:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:32:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:32:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Will Hartung</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sun claims best-in-class price/performance...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> they're using all of the &quot;horrors&quot; of the EJB stack (EJBs, Entity Beans, etc.)<br><br>Suns server is trying to be competetive. </blockquote><br><br>+1<br>.V]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:45:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:45:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:45:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Vic Cekvenich</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Other kinds of performance</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think the other interesting thing would be a weblog of the porting process to get the benchmark to run, as what we have here is, essentially, a good size &quot;WORA&quot; EJB application (since, SPEC provides the source code to the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:27:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:27:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:27:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Urlap .</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>SPEC benchmarks and price/performance</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[According to Will:<br><br>&quot;Technically you can't make price performance comparisons using the SPEC benchmark (so they say on their website).&quot;<br><br>What I read on SPEC's website is this:<br><br>&quot;SPEC does not endorse any price/performance...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:52:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:52:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:52:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>sszurfer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sun claims best-in-class price/performance...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Plus they're using all of the &quot;horrors&quot; of the EJB stack (EJBs, Entity Beans, etc.)</blockquote><br>SUN's entity beans are powered by SUN's JDO. Do you consider SUN's JDO also as horrors?<br><br>Also Entity beans stay in EJB3. Is it...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:16:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:16:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:16:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Sun claims best-in-class price/performance...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[(Some reason, TSS hates me, wouldn't let me post this a couple of times...)<br><br>Technically you can't make price performance comparisons using the SPEC benchmark (so they say on their website).<br><br>BUT, I think it's fair to say that what we have...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:39:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:39:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:39:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Will Hartung</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>11</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Sun claims best-in-class price/performance score for Sun AS8.1</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I have a hard time finding books on this new App server of Sun's</blockquote><br>What about 2000 pages of free documentation on docs.sun.com ???<br><br>What about that SUN AS 7/8 PE is FREE even for PRODUCTION ???]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:38:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:38:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:38:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Good job</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33463</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Good job Sun.  This product is a lot better than the days of iPlanet.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:37:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:37:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:37:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Brown</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

