Support Forums: Message List - Replace Indexing With Iteration

Agreed

Mon, 24 Apr 2006 02:08:47 -0400

+1

Same as:
http://www.theserverside.com/patterns/thread.tss?thread_id=34115#191457

Agreed

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:44:50 -0500

You're right. Design patterns are more specific to structural abstractions rather than naming specific language parser mechanism.
Nothing can be more of a syntatic sugar than this is.

Replace Indexing With Iteration

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:11:49 -0400

for (double price : prices) {} giving error as Syntax error on token ":", ";" expected.I am using j2sdk1.4.1_01 at present. Which version will be supported by FOR each loop.reg,HAM

JDK 1.5 and...

Replace Indexing With Iteration

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:08:06 -0400

for (double price : prices) {} giving error as Syntax error on token ":", ";" expected.

I am using j2sdk1.4.1_01 at present. Which version will be supported by FOR each loop.

reg,
HAM

Still not a design pattern

Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:38:04 -0400

Not all languages have this syntax.

Regardless, it still doesn't qualify as a design pattern.

Not just a new feature

Fri, 27 May 2005 00:07:04 -0400

The aim for this refactoring is not just that the for-each loop is a new language feature in Tiger. The sample is in Java but it can be done in any other language.

The aim is to simplifying the loops.

wrong thread

Wed, 25 May 2005 23:09:10 -0400

The above comment should go on the other thread.

On the other hand, I'm not sure how using a new language feature qualifies as a design pattern.

Refactoring?

Wed, 25 May 2005 21:58:32 -0400

The NEW enhanced for loop is syntactical sugar aimed at simplifying code needed for the most common loops. Not using it when it doesn't suffice doesn't really qualify as a refactoring.

Replace Indexing With Iteration

Tue, 24 May 2005 19:47:52 -0400

You are iterating over a collection or array in a ugly old manner.

Replace the iteration code with a for-each loop.

Replace this:

void process(Collection processes) {
for...