<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:25:59 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>EJB3 has already gone the wrong direction</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[To be precise, only the marketing machine of IBM and BEA can turn the fortune of EJB3 around, even an ill positioned EJB3.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:08:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:08:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:08:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>Perhaps. I guess we'll see. EJB3 is a direct response to the popularity of Spring and Hibernate.</blockquote>I agree</blockquote>Another example of revisionist?</blockquote><br>Sure. The EJB3 spec team just happen to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:55:23 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:55:23 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:55:23 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>David McCoy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB3 has already gone the wrong direction</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>In addition, I doubt that the EJB2.1 people you list will have an easier time using EJB3 than the Spring/Hibernate people. The concepts of EJB3 are lifting from concepts popularized by those two pieces of software. This isn't just...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:41:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:41:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:41:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Perhaps. I guess we'll see. EJB3 is a direct response to the popularity of Spring and Hibernate.</blockquote>I agree</blockquote><br>Another example of revisionist?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:24:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:24:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:24:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I just believe that the talk that being a standard automatically ensures quality or success simply isn't true.</blockquote><br>I agree that just being a standard doesn't <i>automatically</i> ensure quality, but being a standard that is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:11:29 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:11:29 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:11:29 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Struts is FAR more popular in corporations than JSF.</blockquote>I am not surprised.  Firstly, struts has been around for a long time and there is a lot of investment in it.  Secondly, newer approaches can take a long time to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:54:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:54:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:54:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>David McCoy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB Threading</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Sure that are cases when some resources should be used in a thread safe manner, but it is usually easy enough to handle this synchronization without using EJB. One way is to use a pool of non-thread safe objects (Spring supports this for instance). The...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:12:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:12:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:12:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Victor Yushenko</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Struts is FAR more popular in corporations than JSF.</blockquote><br>I am not surprised.  Firstly, struts has been around for a long time and there is a lot of investment in it.  Secondly, newer approaches can take a long time to appear in...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:40:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:40:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:40:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Perhaps. I guess we'll see. EJB3 is a direct response to the popularity of Spring and Hibernate.</blockquote>I agree<blockquote>And JSF has yet to be a slamdunk.</blockquote>Fair anough. It is havily pushed by SUN, Oracle and IBM....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:16:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:16:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:16:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>David McCoy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Should you /ever/ distribute web and business?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>There is a Folwer person who put it as a &quot;law&quot; #1 - Don't distribute it. And I have similar feeling about why would you ever....But what if you /have to/? Like, your webapp has to consume a service exposed as EJB by someone else,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:44:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:44:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:44:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[At about the same time (late 1990s) as the EJB spec was being written people (like me) involved in distributed systems were on to our second generation architectures which did not in general expose distributed object graphs to clients directly. We had...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:39:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:39:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:39:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Campbell</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Should you /ever/ distribute web and business?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Floyd mentions that only 15% of EJB users actually deployed web and business tiers on physically separate tiers and says his book should have been called &quot;EJB Distributed Design Patterns&quot;.  But I've always had a hard time seeing in...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:37:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:37:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:37:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Perhaps. I guess we'll see. EJB3 is a direct response to the popularity of Spring and Hibernate.</blockquote>I agree<blockquote>And JSF has yet to be a slamdunk.</blockquote>Fair anough. It is havily pushed by SUN, Oracle and IBM. We will...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:32:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:32:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:32:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Floyd Marinescu: &amp;quot;A brief history of EJB&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Damin wrote:.... the enterprise mainstream is going to be JSF + EJB3. </blockquote>On Studio Creator I assume. They desrve it then. I think that is shortest road for them to convert .NETv2.</blockquote><br>Nope. JSF with drag and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:10:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:10:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 04:10:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>damian frach</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB3 has already gone the wrong direction</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35453</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In addition, I doubt that the EJB2.1 people you list will have an easier time using EJB3 than the Spring/Hibernate people. The concepts of EJB3 are lifting from concepts popularized by those two pieces of software. This isn't just an issue of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:34:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:34:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:34:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 27, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Jiang</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

