Support Forums: Message List - OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:27:58 -0400 Re: OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:00:26 -0500 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:00:26 -0500 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:00:26 -0500 Nov 27, 2006 pankaj grover 0 Will TheServerSide Ever Make It Easer To Read These Forums! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 Build 7680
Platform Win32 and its Mozilla facade.
Is the problem CSS, XSLT or what?]]> Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:30:46 -0400 Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:30:46 -0400 Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:30:46 -0400 Aug 11, 2005 Jim Stuttard 0 OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 EJB3 does not exist as 'de facto' standard.EJB3 exists, and easily will be 'de facto' standard for persistence in the future.
The availability and popularity of standalone "EJB 3.0 POJO persistence" implementations,...]]> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:19:53 -0400 Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:19:53 -0400 Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:19:53 -0400 Aug 10, 2005 George Jiang 0 OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645
And EJB3 does not exist.
Except Here: http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/java/ejb30.htmlHere: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:02:22 -0400 Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:02:22 -0400 Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:02:22 -0400 Aug 10, 2005 Steve Zara 0 OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645
EJB3 exists, and easily will be 'de facto' standard for persistence in the future.

But about that some questions arise:
- Will the Hibernate community migrate to EJB3?
- Will the JDO...]]> Wed, 10 Aug 2005 02:53:49 -0400 Wed, 10 Aug 2005 02:53:49 -0400 Wed, 10 Aug 2005 02:53:49 -0400 Aug 10, 2005 javierpaniza 1 OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 And EJB3 does not exist.
Except
Here: http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/java/ejb30.html
Here: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:31:58 -0400 Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:31:58 -0400 Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:31:58 -0400 Aug 9, 2005 Donald Smith 3 OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 To summaries, there are three controversies in the article, i.e.
- accuse Spring for non-standard
Maybe 15 years ago we have Standard vs Propietary dilema.

But now we have Open Source, Propietary and Standard, and...]]> Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:35:45 -0400 Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:35:45 -0400 Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:35:45 -0400 Aug 9, 2005 javierpaniza 4 OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 To summaries, there are three controversies in the article, i.e.
- accuse Spring for XML configuration
The question is not XML versus annotations, the question is complex versus simple.
The XML DD of EJB is quite complex...]]> Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:24:48 -0400 Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:24:48 -0400 Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:24:48 -0400 Aug 9, 2005 javierpaniza 0 OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 there are three controversies in the article,i.e.
- call "EJB3" a POJO framework
...
The full EJB 3.0 requires a Java EE 5.0 server.]]> Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:01:55 -0400 Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:01:55 -0400 Mon, 08 Aug 2005 19:01:55 -0400 Aug 8, 2005 George Jiang 0 OnJava Article: Spring vs. EJB 3.0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645
- call "EJB3" a POJO framework
- accuse Spring for XML configuration
- accuse Spring for non-standard]]> Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:34:57 -0400 Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:34:57 -0400 Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:34:57 -0400 Aug 7, 2005 George Jiang 7 TSS editors added them! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 comparing the approaches that the two frameworks take to persisting Java objects - so far as Spring can be considered to focus on the specific capability of persistence.
This is also the words of TSS editors, not mine. Thanks,...]]> Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:21:06 -0400 Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:21:06 -0400 Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:21:06 -0400 Aug 7, 2005 George Jiang 0 Spring and EJB3 persistence http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 Personally I think it's all a healthy discussion to have, and seeing how much fun and productive it's been for my team to be working with Rod and Jurgen on the Spring-TopLink support, there will only be more benefits to continuing this onto...]]> Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:14:20 -0400 Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:14:20 -0400 Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:14:20 -0400 Aug 6, 2005 Juergen Hoeller 0 Will TheServerSide Ever Make It Easer To Read These Forums! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645
Second, more often than not, the message header layer is misplaced low enough to completely cover two rows of text.

Is my Firefox the reason? Am...]]> Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:36:36 -0400 Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:36:36 -0400 Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:36:36 -0400 Aug 6, 2005 Florin Gheorghies 1 totally biased and written by a Spring novice http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 http://www.enterprisej2me.com/

Peace,

Cameron Purdy
Tangosol Coherence: Clustered Shared...]]> Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:27:22 -0400 Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:27:22 -0400 Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:27:22 -0400 Aug 6, 2005 Cameron Purdy 0 totally biased and written by a Spring novice http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35645 Don't blindly buy into the EJB3 propaganda. *Really* learn Spring and then judge for yourself.
I'm not sure I understand. I don't think I've ever met someone in the EJB3 community who doesn't have a lot of respect for Spring....]]> Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:21:21 -0400 Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:21:21 -0400 Sat, 06 Aug 2005 10:21:21 -0400 Aug 6, 2005 Donald Smith 0