Support Forums: Message List - Building Custom JSF UI Components http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sat, 25 May 2013 17:55:40 -0400 The point http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900 Sun, 21 Aug 2005 04:20:14 -0400 Sun, 21 Aug 2005 04:20:14 -0400 Sun, 21 Aug 2005 04:20:14 -0400 Aug 21, 2005 Werner Punz 0 Compilation error :-) http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900
I think that function does more than getting the price for IBM...

So it is still not complete ;-)

I don't think the point of the article is to get at which framework 'has the...]]> Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:37:52 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:37:52 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:37:52 -0400 Aug 20, 2005 Martijn Dashorst 0 for the sake of completeness http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900
class StockForm extends SPanel {
    public StockForm() {
        super(new...]]> Sat, 20 Aug 2005 07:04:16 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 07:04:16 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 07:04:16 -0400 Aug 20, 2005 Holger Engels 1 additional note http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900 Many of us work with JSF with no tool support, no drag-and-drop, yet find it simple and powerful. Sure, it has flaws, but requiring tools is not one of them.

Sure. You can hand code your EJB's too. Now, /that's/ fun.]]> Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:38:04 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:38:04 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 06:38:04 -0400 Aug 20, 2005 Eelco Hillenius 0 additional note http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900 They make application development simple, which JSF can't deliver without drag'n'drop tool support and (according to the JSF incrowd, I haven't confirmed this) the recent addition of JSP 2.x and facelets.
If you...]]> Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:52:46 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:52:46 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 05:52:46 -0400 Aug 20, 2005 Steve Zara 1 Actually, it's not even that hard. http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900
public class StockQuoteLabel extends Label
{
  public StockQuoteLabel(String id, final String symbol)
  {
    super(id, new...]]> Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:09:39 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:09:39 -0400 Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:09:39 -0400 Aug 20, 2005 Jonathan Locke 0 Standards are definitely needed http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900 Fri, 19 Aug 2005 03:46:49 -0400 Fri, 19 Aug 2005 03:46:49 -0400 Fri, 19 Aug 2005 03:46:49 -0400 Aug 19, 2005 Werner Punz 0 Building Custom JSF UI Components http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900 Isn't it a possibility that because Shale/Clay/Facelets are needed, it means that JSF is lacking at best?JSF is a standard! It's like saying that if Servlets were complete we wouldn't need Tomcat/Resin/Jetty. If too many options...]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:23:51 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:23:51 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:23:51 -0400 Aug 18, 2005 Henrique Steckelberg 0 Building Custom JSF UI Components http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:06:54 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:06:54 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:06:54 -0400 Aug 18, 2005 hookomjj 0 Building Custom JSF UI Components http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900
Giving developers too many options (to do the...]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:03:33 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:03:33 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:03:33 -0400 Aug 18, 2005 Martijn Dashorst 2 additional note http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900 JSF is now a 'solid' platform because of it and to sound like a broken record, you will be seeing us now concentrate on ease of development. The foundation is now there, we know what works under the hood. Now we need to do a better job of...]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:25:29 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:25:29 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:25:29 -0400 Aug 18, 2005 Michael Jouravlev 0 additional note http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900
Developers have a lot of options with the JSF stack over getting 'one' solution with Tapestry. Good or bad, the JSF stack has opportunity to evolve at different levels with your needs. I *could* use Oracle's ADF...]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:14:36 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:14:36 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:14:36 -0400 Aug 18, 2005 hookomjj 3 additional note http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900
You are totally right about where JSF is at. You can blame too many roosters in the hen house or the JCP process, but with attempting to push a quote unquote 'standard'-- everyone must be taken into consideration and their needs...]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:48:32 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:48:32 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:48:32 -0400 Aug 18, 2005 hookomjj 1 additional note http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900
I am not sure whether you realize it, but you have just written yet another "Just wait some more!" message.

You see, I have been using Tapestry for an easy component web development since 2001 -- proper encapsulation,...]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:32:50 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:32:50 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:32:50 -0400 Aug 18, 2005 Mind Bridge 6 additional note http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35900 Why do you call them 'simple'? Have you even looked at Tapestry, Wicket and Echo? I hardly call those frameworks simple. They make application development simple, which JSF can't deliver without drag'n'drop tool support and (according...]]> Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:26:39 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:26:39 -0400 Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:26:39 -0400 Aug 18, 2005 hookomjj 7