<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - A case against Annotations</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:24:52 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>denil</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p><br/>Excellent post. I want to thank you for this informative read, I really appreciate sharing this great post. Keep up your work.<a href="http://www.stopanxietyquick.com" target="_blank">Help for   Anxiety</a></p>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:53:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:53:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 05:53:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 20, 2011</jf:date>
        <jf:author>testkumar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java good enough?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The fact that some developers want features to more easily do certain things is not by itself indicative of language merit.<br><br>Are they even trying to do the right things? Many developers these days are ignoring the hard learned lessons of decades...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:04:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:04:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:04:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>michael vaganek</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I think they do have a place</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Annotations have a place. I agree with those who say it's dangerous to use annotations in a large application. However, there are a lot of smaller applications where a single developer or a handful of people are just trying to get something to work and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:12:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:12:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:12:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 31, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Frank LaRosa</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java is the best language for configuration, not XML !!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm not sure at all that system administrators would much enjoy managing .java and .class files for the multiple environments where the applications are running in.<br><br>As a developer I do prefer xml files, but some of the sysadmin's i have been...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:12:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:12:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:12:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 31, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>xavier Cosyns</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java is the best language for configuration, not XML !!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Sure, you can implement something crazy to check the timestamp of your XML file and reload it when it changes. YOU CAN DO THE SAME THING WITH A .CLASS FILE. I agree it is more difficult, but once you have done it, it is done. The framework...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:03:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:03:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:03:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sergio Oliveira</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java is the best language for configuration, not XML !!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>You application is separated from the configuration file.</blockquote>No it's not, because your application need to re-classload the configuration file.Definitely not as simple as reparsing a simple file on your file...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:58:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:58:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:58:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sergio Oliveira</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Annotations not the answer</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>You might want to double check the meaning of &quot;de facto&quot;, I don't think it means what you think it means :-)</blockquote><br>Right. English is not my first language, which might be a wierd argument for a latin phrase. I apologize...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 04:19:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 04:19:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 04:19:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jan Hansen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The real danger: Version dependence</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The big problem with using annotations is that you start depending on J2SE 1.5/5.0, which for some dev houses can be a leap. This also is an issue with app-server vendors and tool vendors which &quot;certify&quot; their products against a version (like...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 03:59:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 03:59:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 03:59:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tor Iver Wilhelmsen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java is the best language for configuration, not XML !!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>You application is separated from the configuration file.</blockquote>No it's not, because your application need to re-classload the configuration file.<br><br>Definitely not as simple as reparsing a simple file on your file...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 01:16:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 01:16:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 01:16:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cedric Beust</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java is the best language for configuration, not XML !!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Why not stick to the Java language when dealing with configuration ???Why instead of struts-config.xml or xwork.xml we cannot have a struts-config.java or a xwork.java ???</blockquote>Sorry I posted too fast, I had one more...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:57:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:57:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:57:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sergio Oliveira</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java is the best language for configuration, not XML !!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Why not stick to the Java language when dealing with configuration ???Why instead of struts-config.xml or xwork.xml we cannot have a struts-config.java or a xwork.java ???</blockquote>I think it's a very bad idea.If I change a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 15:33:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 15:33:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 15:33:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Annotations not the answer</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>All the technologies you listed above might not be optimal, but they have obviously been very successful in the market place, and they have spurned further efforts to refine them.</blockquote><br>You could say the same for Perl...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 08:42:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 08:42:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 08:42:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java is the best language for configuration, not XML !!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Why not stick to the Java language when dealing with configuration ???Why instead of struts-config.xml or xwork.xml we cannot have a struts-config.java or a xwork.java ???</blockquote>Sorry I posted too fast, I had one more comment to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:43:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:43:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:43:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cedric Beust</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java is the best language for configuration, not XML !!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Why not stick to the Java language when dealing with configuration ???Why instead of struts-config.xml or xwork.xml we cannot have a struts-config.java or a xwork.java ???</blockquote>I think it's a very bad idea.<br><br>If I change a runtime...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:40:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:40:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:40:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cedric Beust</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java is the best language for configuration, not XML !!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36110</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Why not stick to the Java language when dealing with configuration ???<br><br>Why instead of struts-config.xml or xwork.xml we cannot have a struts-config.java or a xwork.java ???<br><br>Two understand this new idea, check this project:<br><br><a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:52:51 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:52:51 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:52:51 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sergio Oliveira</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

