<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Threadless AJAX polling with Jetty 6.0 Continuations</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:58:55 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>This is proven method of acheiving scalability</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[As an ex team mate of the aimexpress.aol.com team (pure dhtml client for aim) which used similar technology, we noticed that this is a proven scalable architecture for certain clients with special needs and can be also generalized for all the other types...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:28:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:28:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:28:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 24, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>geek squad</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Threadless AJAX polling with Jetty 6.0 Continuations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://simpleweb.sourceforge.net/design/concurrency.php" target="_blank">http://simpleweb.sourceforge.net/design/concurrency.php</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:16:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:16:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:16:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rodolfo  de Paula</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Better Name?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[From what I understand, your purpose is not to provide continuations, but to provide a mechanisms to respond to requests that are waiting for events without blocking resources (threads). So I think that you should reflect that intent in the name of the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:08:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:08:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:08:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gbevin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Better Name?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[MMMmmmmmm...... I agree the current implementations are less than pure formal Continuations.   But they are just implementations.  The intent and purpose of the interface is for Continuations and that is how the programmer will use it.<br><br>Originally...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:54:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:54:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:54:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gregw</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Better Name?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Greg,<br><br>sorry, I didn't see the RetryContinuation inner class of SelectChannelConnector until this morning when I had time to play with the Ajax Chat demo.<br><br>However, it seems even further from continuations than your WaitingContinuation...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:57:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:57:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:57:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gbevin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>shouldn't the AJAX client do the polling?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>If the problem is holding if you are using lots of asynchronous messaging with Ajax, then this change allows you to support 1000s of clients, to use the Servlet API on the server side and not have 1000s of blocked threads.James<a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:48:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:48:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 03:48:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Strachan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>shouldn't the AJAX client do the polling?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If the problem is holding if you are using lots of asynchronous messaging with Ajax, then this change allows you to support 1000s of clients, to use the Servlet API on the server side and not have 1000s of blocked threads.James<a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:10:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:10:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:10:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>bad mASH</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Plain HTML client</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I'll be writing a short article this week to talk a bit about 'continuations' and 'continuations'. Imho, this Jetty 6 feature aren't 'continuations'. They don't capture the local variable state and the program counter, they don't restore it...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:21:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:21:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:21:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remy Maucherat</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Better Name?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>But as far as java and servlets go, the Jetty Continuationscome pretty close to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuation" target="_blank">Wikipedea definition</a>. But Servlets are stateless request handlers and the state they...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:49:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:49:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:49:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gbevin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Browser timeouts</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Wesly,<br><br>The timeout on the server has to be less than the time most browser will wait for a response.  I find 20 or 30 seconds works fine and is a lot less load than an AJAX client that polls continously and a lot more responsive that a client that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:39:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:39:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:39:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gregw</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Better Name?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Gert,<br><br>I agree that naming is difficult and that Continuations in other languages may be able to offer more features than are available in java servlets.<br><br>But as far as java and servlets go, the Jetty Continuations<br>come pretty close to the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:33:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:33:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:33:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gregw</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>shouldn't the AJAX client do the polling?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If the problem is holding connections on the server, shouldn't the state be completely stripped from the server the asynchronicity be managed by the AJAX client?AJAX already starts magnifying processing burdens on the web client side, so one...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:24:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:24:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:24:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Strachan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>shouldn't the AJAX client do the polling?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[If the problem is holding connections on the server, shouldn't the state be completely stripped from the server the asynchronicity be managed by the AJAX client?<br><br>AJAX already starts magnifying processing burdens on the web client side, so one...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:05:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:05:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:05:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Constance Eustace</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Threadless AJAX polling with Jetty 6.0 Continuations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Wouldnt the browser timeout while waiting for the container to resume processing?<br><br>Also, I would think that the more efficient use of the thread pool is just one of the concerns regarding scalability. If we are saying that the browser will retain...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:57:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:57:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:57:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Wesley Hall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Plain HTML client</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36594</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'll be writing a short article this week to talk a bit about 'continuations' and 'continuations'. Imho, this Jetty 6 feature aren't 'continuations'. They don't capture the local variable state and the program counter, they don't restore it later and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:30:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:30:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:30:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>gbevin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

