<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Interesting debate on API-less clustering and correctness</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:11:43 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Why do we need a separate database and cache?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>.. all that, and I'd add that it's about having the ability to do it at in-memory speeds (&quot;zero-latency&quot;) without trading off the qualities of availability and reliability that make the database a very safe...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:07:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:07:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:07:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why do we need a separate database and cache?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>We think of caching not just as a layer on top of your RDB to make it faster, but as a first class architectural component for your middle tier for managing and distributing OPERATIONAL data very efficiently. It is about data arriving from...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:03:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:03:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:03:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why do we need a separate database and cache?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>But in the long haul, are caches and traditional RDBMSes both necessary?It seems to me that an RDBMS could &quot;absorb&quot; the cache functionality if it became much more &quot;object aware&quot; and more easily...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:09:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:09:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:09:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 6, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jags Ramnarayan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why do we need a separate database and cache?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>It seems to me that an RDBMS could &quot;absorb&quot; the cache functionality if it became much more &quot;object aware&quot; and more easily distributable.</blockquote><br>that's probably why Oracle bought...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:24:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:24:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 10:24:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why do we need a separate database and cache?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It seems to me that an RDBMS could &quot;absorb&quot; the cache functionality if it became much more &quot;object aware&quot; and more easily distributable.</blockquote><br>that's probably why Oracle bought TimesTen<br><br><a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:00:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:00:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:00:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 2, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Pasker</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why do we need a separate database and cache?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[There's a lot of discussion in this thread about the practical aspects of clustered caches vs clustered databases and the costs of the hardware etc etc required for them...<br><br>But in the long haul, are caches and traditional RDBMSes both...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 12:17:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 12:17:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 12:17:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 2, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>databases are the reason why clustered caching exists!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Which easy apps were you talking about then? ;-)</blockquote><br>They are not easy, they are hard, and when you encounter them, you'll know ;-)<br><blockquote>What NSA apps do they waste my tax dollars on that actually require...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 00:49:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 00:49:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 00:49:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 2, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guglielmo Lichtner</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>databases are the reason why clustered caching exists!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>there are many people who 1) have serious scalability problems with their database, and 2) could cheaply use a distributed cache on a bunch of cheap, ethernet-networked machines and solve their problems.</blockquote><br>I know. I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:03:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:03:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:03:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 1, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>databases are the reason why clustered caching exists!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I'm sure the NSA uses things like Infiniband, and I know banking apps that can benefit as well.  But by and large those are very specialized apps that need every little erg of power they can get out of their hardware.  But below that extreme...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:41:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:41:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:41:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guglielmo Lichtner</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Specialized hardware</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[its right here, and both Tangosol and TerraCotta are partners.<br><br><a href="http://www.azulsystems.com" target="_blank">http://www.azulsystems.com</a><br><br>--bob (working @azul, TAB member of TC)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:05:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:05:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:05:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Pasker</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>databases are the reason why clustered caching exists!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think you're missing the obvious point here.  Joe blow can buy 10 linux blades and hook 'em up via Ethernet using strictly commodity stuff.  And end up with a distributed cache that blows the doors off of standard RDBMS setups.<br><br>You could do the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:40:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:40:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:40:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Spille</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>databases are the reason why clustered caching exists!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The interesting solutions (to me) are those that get great performance and scalability on commodity hardware.</blockquote><br>Infiniband is cheap. Few people use it, but most of the people that use it buy hundreds or thousands of nodes. NSA...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:06:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:06:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:06:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guglielmo Lichtner</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>databases are the reason why clustered caching exists!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It's not just that most DBAs don't know about these things.  Factor in the cost of Infiniband and then factor in the cost of licensing Oracle and/or DB2 to do this.  Then get your network people to buy into a very custom network with servers colocated...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:51:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:51:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:51:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Spille</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>databases are the reason why clustered caching exists!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The most common issue is that by and large RDBMS systems are designed to run on a single host.  To get really good performance out of them directly people tend to either a) stick them on huge boxes, b) partition their data so they're using...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:23:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:23:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:23:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guglielmo Lichtner</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>databases are the reason why clustered caching exists!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36753</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The most common issue is that by and large RDBMS systems are designed to run on a single host.  To get really good performance out of them directly people tend to either a) stick them on huge boxes, b) partition their data so they're using several...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:22:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:22:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:22:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Spille</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

