<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Gemini 1.0 released: bidirectional relationships for POJOs</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:11:28 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Towards a more domain focused code</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For the code saving part: how about just creating a couple of code templates (in your fav IDE/ editor) for things like this? If you are worried about lines of code, well... that's the way to go imho (or use plain old OO...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:39:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:39:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:39:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 5, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dragan Djuric</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Towards a more domain focused code</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[For the code saving part: how about just creating a couple of code templates (in your fav IDE/ editor) for things like this? If you are worried about lines of code, well... that's the way to go imho (or use plain old OO techniques).]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:05:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:05:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:05:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 5, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Towards a more domain focused code</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think a broader array of such tools will allow us to focus on more domain focused programming since the combination of aspects/annotations will reduce our development efforts one line at a time.</blockquote><br>I very much agree about more...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:44:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:44:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:44:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>does it work with Hibernate field access?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Without having looked into how Gemini does it's trick: do you see any problems with using it on fields that are managed by Hibernate using field access (as opposed to property (getter/setter) access)</blockquote>Gemini handles it! In fact,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:40:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:40:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:40:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dragan Djuric</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>does it work with Hibernate field access?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[hi!<br><br>Some time ago i've created a small helper library for exactly the same purpose because i've found myself coding the same pattern in accessors again and again. There is hardly any project now where I don't need that functionality. So i actually...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 05:42:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 05:42:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 05:42:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>GeraldLoeffler</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Not Really</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think to save two lines of code, I am not going to change all my POJOs. There is no extra benefit by using such annotation. <br>In Hibernate, the relationship is maintained in DB.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:45:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:45:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 02:45:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 3, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ranjan Baisak</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Gemini 1.0 released: bidirectional relationships for POJOs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>but if you use it in any real way you end up six months down the line with an unholy mess that you just can't trust.</blockquote>Do you have some real reasons to think that , or you just guess?<blockquote>if it were completely...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:24:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:24:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:24:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 2, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dragan Djuric</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Gemini 1.0 released: bidirectional relationships for POJOs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think this is another AOP - it looks like there might be some mileage in it with simple examples, but if you use it in any real way you end up six months down the line with an unholy mess that you just can't trust.<br><br>I wonder too about binary...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:13:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:13:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:13:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ross Bamford</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Annotations vs Classes</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>...It is better that every framework come up with its annotations, than that every framework come up with its classes that you must extend and stuck up with.</blockquote><br>While I am trying to keep an open mind about Annotations (and AOP as...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:23:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:23:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:23:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robert Hedin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I think you are missing something</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>1. What would you do with simple<br>fields?</blockquote>I dont know what you mean here. Can you please<br>explain.</blockquote>An example is Employee.company. When you set a new value of company<br>you have to remove the old value...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:16:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:16:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:16:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dragan Djuric</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Towards a more domain focused code</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[As a tool it seems to be quite limited in scope but at the price point it still seems quite useful. <br><br>However if I was to consider this to be one of the relatively early commercial offerings which offered a combination of aspects and annotations in...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:25:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:25:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:25:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>dnene</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I think you are missing something</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>1. What would you do with simple fields?</blockquote>I dont know what you mean here. Can you please explain.<br><blockquote>2. For Collections, lists. etc:a) You have to write a new DirectionalList subclass for every property that you want to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:49:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:49:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:49:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dennis Bekkering</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simple Principle - Roll Your Own</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I like the idea of using annotations to enforce the principle, but the notion of removing the 'code couplet' is easily achieved with your own code.<br><br>I wrote a paper on this quite a while back.  I have it available on my website at <br><br><a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:23:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:23:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:23:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>david bock</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Streamlined Object Modeling</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Matthew<br><br>After waiting some months, I finally received my copy and have been reading SOM book last week. It is simply amazing. <br><br>I agree Gemini could be much more interesting by supporting SOM test methods. Actually it is a brilliant idea...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:14:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:14:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:14:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rodolfo  de Paula</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Test methods?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=36825</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[@Matthew<br><br>No, Gemini does not handle test methods, because it is a framework for bidirectional relationships. Addin such thing would just overcomplicate the framework, which aims to be extremly focused and easy to use.<br><br>But, I am aware of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:09:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:09:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:09:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dragan Djuric</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

