<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Dan Zambonini: What would you put in the ultimate Base Class?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:08:24 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Dan Zambonini: What would you put in the ultimate Base Class?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I would keep the base class simple (with nothing in it). Let's get back to work guys!]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:58:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:58:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:58:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex Koyfman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Use aspects instead of &amp;quot;hard-wiring&amp;quot; specific features</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hiya Dean, <br><br>Sorry for the late reply, been very busy these last weeks...<br><blockquote>&nbsp;My point is that in an &quot;aspect nirvana&quot; (which is not where we are yet), you don't have to commit to adding these things to your object...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 04:48:35 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 04:48:35 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 04:48:35 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Dan Zambonini: What would you put in the ultimate Base Class?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I wish java.lang.Object contained the methods:<br><br>giveLandingPermissionToFlight(String flight)<br>createAppointment(String name, Date date)<br><br>Would certainly make building air traffic control software OR<br>dentist reservation systems...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:56:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:56:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:56:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 9, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jens Wyke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Use aspects instead of &amp;quot;hard-wiring&amp;quot; specific features</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Remi,<br><br>I'm not trying to question the value of &quot;toString()&quot;, etc. I love 'em too and I agree that Sun made the correct decision to include them in Object. My point is that in an &quot;aspect nirvana&quot; (which is not where we are yet),...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:42:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:42:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:42:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 9, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dean Wampler</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Use aspects instead of &amp;quot;hard-wiring&amp;quot; specific features</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[First off, I won't comment on the bullshit that PHP guy said. The idea of a &quot;toXML()&quot; method in a base class is actually quite revealing of the &quot;usual PHP way to do things&quot; : how can a software architect even think about such a crappy...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 07:36:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 07:36:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 07:36:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 9, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Use aspects instead of &amp;quot;hard-wiring&amp;quot; specific features</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[As other posters pointed out, it's easy to end up with a grab back of stuff, most of which might be useful sometimes, but almost all of which is not used most of the time. <br><br>Take for example the thread notification and &quot;toString()&quot;...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:38:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:38:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:38:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dean Wampler</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Inheritance is for whimps</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'd put nothing in my ultimate base class .... inheritance is for whimps ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:16:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:16:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:16:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jonny LeRoy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Back To Basics</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[IMHO the ultimate base class should be flexible enough to allow derived classes to choose their implementation but at the same time it can guide the steps of a processing as well. <br>eg.. The base class can have Save method which will call few abstract...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:16:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:16:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:16:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Samir Mishra</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>No such thing</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Instead of doing all this in the base class, maybe you should consider that *rendering* an object into various formats (XML, CSV, etc) is not the job of the object itself...  same with being able to load/store itself in a DB.<br><br>The idea of an...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:05:17 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:05:17 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:05:17 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nate Sammons</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Dan Zambonini: What would you put in the ultimate Base Class?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37397</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Dan Zambonini, in &quot;<a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/8276" target="_blank">What would you put in the ultimate Base Class?</a>,&quot; brings up an interesting theoretical exercise: what methods or attributes would you put into the ultimate...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:26:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:26:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 08:26:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 2, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

