<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - From XML.com : 'Fixing AJAX: XmlHttpRequest Considered Harmful'</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:36:28 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>AJAX/DHTML in JavaScript has no fun</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Due to incompatibility among browsers and buggy implementations, it is painful to do sophisticated operations, such as AJAX and DHTML, in JavaScript.<br><br>However, many tools emerged to soften the issue. It is better to count on one of them, rather...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 01:22:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 01:22:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 01:22:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 15, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Yeh</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AJAX not mature jet</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Please read:<br><br><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/IETechCol/dnwebgen/ie_leak_patterns.asp"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 03:57:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 03:57:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 03:57:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>P s</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Couldn't a hidden IFrame be used?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[A hidden IFRAME can be used, but you are limited with what you can do with it. For example, if you use an IFRAME an duser used the back button, you will use the history of that IFRAME whereas the XmlHttpRequest will not. Also, you can post complex data...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:27:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:27:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:27:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ryan McDonough</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Hacking AJAX instead of Fixing AJAX.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Undoubtedly, it helps to write AJAX application if you generate AJAX stub from third-party WSDL directly. However, this solution is really not fixing AJAX and may not be sophisticated.<br><br>If AJAX is allowed to send XMLHttpRequest to third-party and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:37:28 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:37:28 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:37:28 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Ng</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Couldn't a hidden IFrame be used?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Before I knew about XmlHttpRequest, I used to do AJAX-like stuff in a hidden IFrame.  The hidden IFrame can invoke Javascript (and thus perform DHTML actions) on the parent page, allowing AJAX-like behavior on some browsers that don't support...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:15:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:15:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:15:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Mahemoff</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Paranoya</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The biggest showstopper is paranoya. MS IExporer historicaly has tendency to just disabling thing that is potentionally dangerous but they can't handle it in intelligent way (preventing rought aspects and allow useful). The users don't really knows that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:41:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:41:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:41:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eugene Lucash</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>From XML.com : 'Fixing AJAX: XmlHttpRequest Considered Harmful'</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This AJAX mania is amusing me lately very much.<br>AJAX is nothing more then a small hack trying to correct much bigger hack (markup and document based applications over a statless connection).<br><br>I hope this madness will stop sooner then later and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:36:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:36:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:36:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mileta Cekovic</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Couldn't a hidden IFrame be used?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I ask myself the same question.<br>What is wrong in use hidden Iframe's.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:55:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:55:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:55:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Lorenzo Gonzalez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>RE: Couldn't a hidden IFrame be used?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[No, it should not work. You can't make cross-domain js calls.<br>See <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb" target="_blank">http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb</a>;en-us;167796<br>(Of course vulnerabilities may still...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:43:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:43:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:43:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>arnaud masson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>RE: Couldn't a hidden IFrame be used?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I you probably still can.  However, this loop hole could close in the future.  I have in the passed used javascript to play sounds by writing an EMBED tag into an IFRAME.   IE no longer allows this.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:47:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:47:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:47:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reg Whitton</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Couldn't a hidden IFrame be used?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Before I knew about XmlHttpRequest, I used to do AJAX-like stuff in a hidden IFrame.  The hidden IFrame can invoke Javascript (and thus perform DHTML actions) on the parent page, allowing AJAX-like behavior on some browsers that don't support...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:25:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:25:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:25:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dan Kirkpatrick</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Ajax must stay in sandbox</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Ajax must stay in sandbox.. interactions with webservices<br>or remoting can be triggered by Ajax application but must be processed on serverside. If developers will choose to violate this principle then ajax stuff will be considered dangerous by users...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:11:28 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:11:28 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:11:28 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eugene Lucash</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>From XML.com : 'Fixing AJAX: XmlHttpRequest Considered Harmful'</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37514</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Despite the title, &quot;<a href="http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2005/11/09/fixing-ajax-xmlhttprequest-considered-harmful.html?CMP=OTC-TY3388567169" target="_blank">Fixing AJAX: XmlHttpRequest Considered Harmful</a>&quot; addresses a potential gotcha with AJAX...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:18:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:18:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:18:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>12</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

