<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Mule 1.2, ESB Messaging Framework released</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:22:51 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Some Comparison between Service Mix and Mule</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[All,<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Happened to see the following link. Thought helpful for other folks.<br><br><a href="http://www.geotools.org/display/SM/How+does+ServiceMix+compare+to+Mule"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:17:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:17:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:17:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Giri Kosuru</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Mule or ServiceMix</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm currently evaluating whether Mule or whether ServiceMix is better to use.  I've heard plenty of things in this thread alone, but also in the rest of the community, that Mule is great, works really well, etc.  On the other hand, I've heard very little...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:37:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:37:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:37:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Marques</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: OK, can someone clear this up?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I find that the main benefits of ESBs over traditional hub and spoke queueing solutions is the binding aspect.  With a true ESB, one should be able to expose these services as pure XML, a Java API, an EJB, whatever.  Then, you can plop a JVM, or a J2EE...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:33:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:33:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:33:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Marques</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>OK, can someone clear this up?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It seems to me that an ESB is a concept, a set of patterns for implementing an architecture in a particular way. As an abstract concept, there really is nothing to stop you implementing the same thing with your framework of choice, or even in pure java....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:41:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:41:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:41:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 20, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dave Hewitt</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>OK, can someone clear this up?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[As a long time java developer, someone who's bought and read David Chappell's &quot;Enterprise Service Bus,&quot; and &quot;Enterprise Integration Patterns,&quot; by Hohpe and Woolf (great books), and even played around with a couple of test Mule...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:54:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:54:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:54:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brendan Curran</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Mule 1.2, ESB Messaging Framework released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I've just used in the last project for a very big bank company. Thanks to Mule we have integrated 4 different systems together in some weeks handling several kinds of messages with very good performance.<br><br>Very great product!<br><br>bye,<br>Luca...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:10:14 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:10:14 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:10:14 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Luca Garulli</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>ESBs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[At SourceLabs we hear from large customers looking hard at ESBs (mostly open source), either as replacements for their legacy messaging implementations (e.g. TIBCO Rendezvous) or as a phase ii or phase iii project for their web services architecture....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:41:28 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:41:28 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:41:28 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>byron  sebastian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Solution looking for a problem</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>In order to avoid the &quot;solution-looking-for-a-problem&quot; pattern, it would be great to have a buzzword-less list of business-cases which are likely to be solved with an ESB and a list of ones which aren't. How's people...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:40:10 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:40:10 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:40:10 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Francisco A Lozano</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Solution looking for a problem</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In order to avoid the &quot;solution-looking-for-a-problem&quot; pattern, it would be great to have a buzzword-less list of business-cases which are likely to be solved with an ESB and a list of ones which aren't. How's people currently using...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:13:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:13:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:13:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>D K</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Mule rendering j2ee containers obsolete?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Of course it's not just Mule that is offering a more practical and flexible alternative to j2ee containers.  But also other ESB and lightweight containers.  <br><br>In new development projects - and especially in SOA environments - we're typically...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:35:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:35:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:35:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rob Bork</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Too much frameworks?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> Seems to me, open source ESB is the way to go, because this type of infrastructure begs for &#x201c;lightweight&#x201d; support and open standards. </blockquote><br>Completely agree.ESB based on open standard is the prefered way to go for...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:17:28 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:17:28 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:17:28 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>chussenet</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Too many frameworks?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I know that, but projects at codehaus had always better interoperability than frameworks from other &quot;repository&quot;. They was usually done hand by hand to achieve something bigger/better.</blockquote>Mule has full support for JBI so...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:00:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ross Mason</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>oh dear :O</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>ServiceMix is a JBI (JSR 208)implementation which can use Mule to route messages. It has a higher level API than Mule IMO.Service mix can be used as an ESB, whereas Mule does not adhere to the JBI spec. This isn't a criticism of Mule, in fact...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:13:04 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:13:04 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:13:04 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pavel Tavoda</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Too many frameworks?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>&quot;The Codehaus is an open-source project repository&quot; - not a 'Company'.</blockquote> I know that, but projects at codehaus had always better interoperability than frameworks from other &quot;repository&quot;. They was usually done...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:51:22 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:51:22 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:51:22 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pavel Tavoda</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Too many frameworks?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37606</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[</blockquote>&quot;The Codehaus is an open-source project repository&quot; - not a 'Company'.</blockquote> I know that, but projects at codehaus had always better interoperability than frameworks from other &quot;repository&quot;. They was usually done...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:51:01 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:51:01 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:51:01 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pavel Tavoda</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

