<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Getting started with EJB 3.0 persistence out-of-container</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:16:17 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Annotations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Workaround is to duplicate class definitions and to use common interface. It is not a problem if code is generated :)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:26:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:26:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:26:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 31, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Annotations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I'm not keen on annotations here too. It is not actually transparent POJO persistence like Hibernate used to be for years. You have to import all that annotations into Your source code (On the other hand it's incredibly convenient, and IMO...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:54:49 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:54:49 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:54:49 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gavin King</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Getting started with EJB 3.0 persistence out-of-container</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[With EJB 3.0 writing an Entity bean and Session bean is just more than a cake walk... Really i love the EJB 3 specifications...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:02:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:02:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:02:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Srinath V</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>adjust your though patterns</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Why is it represented in different tables in your relational model. There must be a reason for that.</blockquote><br>There might be plenty of reasons: <br><br>1. security (only authorized users can view/change personal data, but everyone can...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:59:08 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:59:08 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:59:08 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Artur Karazniewicz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>adjust your though patterns</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>How Enterprise's Address is different from Person's Address or how living address is different from official/other address when thinking about domain model? I just don't want implement two classes + interface that abstracts <b>exactly</b> the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:16:15 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:16:15 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:16:15 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Emmanuel Bernard</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>adjust your though patterns</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote> There is no way to map one class few times in different contexts, thus really reuse basic entities within application. Typical problem is for example Address class. There is no need to have OfficiallAddress, and LivingAddress...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:02:35 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:02:35 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 08:02:35 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Artur Karazniewicz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>adjust your though patterns</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> There is no way to map one class few times in different contexts, thus really reuse basic entities within application. Typical problem is for example Address class. There is no need to have OfficiallAddress, and LivingAddress  classes but...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:59:53 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:59:53 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:59:53 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Werner Punz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Annotations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Perhaps I'm in the minority, but I don't see what the benefits of using annotations are here. Consider 2 domain classes that really would be reusable - a Path class that has a list of Location classes, where each Location has a latitude,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:54:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:54:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:54:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Artur Karazniewicz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another advantage of annotations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Don't forget also all the people who were happy XDoclet users, which have used annotations way before .Net came up, and may gladly migrate to standard annotations now in EJB3. Whomever prefers XML will be able to keep using it too, so I think this is a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:54:01 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:54:01 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:54:01 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another advantage of annotations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well the poster before me pointed out that annotations help to develop apps more quickly.<br>The two most famous examples probably are<br>@Webmethod<br>and<br>@Transactional<br><br>in one case you do not get the whole wsdl-xml mess which is really lousy...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:28:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:28:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:28:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Werner Punz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Annotations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You will find divided opinion about using annotations to specify table and column names. Using annotations to specify table or column names is not very different from using embedded SQL in an application which was a common practice not so long back and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:20:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:20:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 03:20:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 30, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sahoo Sanjeeb</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Annotations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Perhaps I'm in the minority, but I don't see what the benefits of using annotations are here. Consider 2 domain classes that really would be reusable - a Path class that has a list of Location classes, where each Location has a latitude, longitude, and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:05:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:05:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:05:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Robert Smith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Getting started with EJB 3.0 persistence out-of-container</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Gavin, I don't think you understood the article initially. Just saw &quot;out-of-container&quot; and rushed to conclusion without reading the whole article. May you need some more sleep, man! :)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:16:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:16:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 19:16:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jan de Jonge</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Afterwards</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> Face it, at the time the entity beans were implemented firstto my knowledge there was no real well working object persistence layer experience on the java side.</blockquote><br>your favourite TOPLink was there for Java, way before any one...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:47:49 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:47:49 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:47:49 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rashid Jilani</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Afterwards</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=38276</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>My friend I am not here to win &quot;who is wiser&quot; contest. At least that is not my intention, specially in a community where people still can have a war on the text editors:-) I don't know how long you have been particpating on TSS...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:45:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:45:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:45:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Werner Punz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

